Usefulness and Usability of a Multilingual Electronic Meeting System

§ School of Business Administration, University of Mis...

Send Message

To: Author

Usefulness and Usability of a Multilingual Electronic Meeting System

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTGYD8B

Usefulness and Usability of a Multilingual Electronic Meeting System Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Communication in multilingual meetings is difficult, and interpersonal barriers increase with the number of languages used in the discussion. In this paper, we show how participants in pseudo-oral and electronic, multilingual meetings were able to comprehend previously prepared comments in up to five languages, but the electronic meetings took much less time. In addition, there were no significant differences between the two types of meetings in terms of ease of use or usefulness, which leads us to the conclusion that for certain sets of languages and topics, an electronic meeting with machine translation is a viable alternative to the more traditional, oral setting.

References

31 Cites in Article
  1. Milam Aiken (2008). Multilingual Collaboration in Electronic Meetings.
  2. Milam Aiken,Linwu Gu,Jianfeng Wang (2002). Electronic Meeting Topic Effects.
  3. M Aiken,K Ghosh (2009). Automatic translation in multilingual business meetings.
  4. M Aiken,C Rebman,M Vanjani,T Robbins (2002). Meetings without borders: A multilingual Web-based group support system.
  5. M Aiken,J Martin,A Shirani,T Singleton (1994). A group decision support system for multicultural and multilingual communication.
  6. M Aiken,M Park,T Lindblom (2010). Integrating machine translation with grou support systems.
  7. M Aiken,J Wang,L Gu,J Paolillo (2011). An exploratory study of how technology supports communication in multilingual groups.
  8. M Aiken,Z Wong (2003). The effect of group size on electronic idea generation.
  9. R Al-Khanji,S El-Shiyab,R Hussein (2000). On the use of compensatory strategies in simultaneous interpretation.
  10. R Briggs,J Nunamaker,R Sprague (1998). 1001 Unanswered research questions in GSS.
  11. J Chuan-Chuan,H Lu (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a web site.
  12. Collegegrad (2010). Career information: Interpreters and Translators.
  13. L Cronbach (1970). Essentials of Psychological Testing.
  14. A Dennis,M Williams (2005). A meta analysis of group size effects in electronic brainstorming: More heads are better than one.
  15. C Fügen,A Waibel,M Kolss (2007). Simultaneous translation of lectures and speeches.
  16. J House,J Rehbein (2004). Multilingual communication.
  17. (2010). Meetings in America.
  18. H Korth,A Silberschatz (1997). Database research faces the information explosion.
  19. Leighton Ku,Glenn Flores (2005). Pay Now Or Pay Later: Providing Interpreter Services In Health Care.
  20. P Legris,J Ingham,P Collerette (2003). Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model.
  21. C Mccomb (2001). About One in Four Americans Can Hold a Conversation in a Second Language.
  22. Barbara Moser-Mercer,Alexander Künzli,Marina Korac (1998). Prolonged turns in interpreting.
  23. J Nunamaker,A Dennis,J Valacich,D Vogel,J George (1991). Electronic meeting systems to support group work.
  24. J Nunnally (1978). Psychometric Theory.
  25. M O'hagan,D Ashworth (2002). Translation-mediated Communication in a Digital World -Facing the Challenges of Globalization and Localization.
  26. Albert Segars,Varun Grover (1993). Re-Examining Perceived Ease of Use and Usefulness: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
  27. O Sert,F Fırat Açıkgöz (2006). Interlingual machine translation: Prospects and setbacks.
  28. N Yamashita,T Ishida (2006). Effects of machine translation on collaborative work.
  29. J Yang,E Lange (2003). Going live on the Internet.
  30. (2010). Video Conferencing: You've Heard the Hype.
  31. B Wixom,P Todd (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

William Pepper, Milam Aiken Ph.D., Bart Garner Ph.D.. 1970. "Usefulness and Usability of a Multilingual Electronic Meeting System". Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - A: Hardware & Computation GJCST-A Volume 11 (GJCST Volume 11 Issue A10).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-A Classification JEL Code: O33
Version of record

v1.2

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 14.8K
Total Downloads: 697
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Usefulness and Usability of a Multilingual Electronic Meeting System

William Pepper
William Pepper School of Business Administration, University of Mississippi
Milam Ph.D.
Milam Ph.D.
Bart Ph.D.
Bart Ph.D.