Article Fingerprint
ReserarchID
ZU206
Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS
Print ISSN 0975-587X
e-ISSN 2249-460X
Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.
Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.
This paper attempted to assess the attitudes of students in
Advances in technology have created the potential for a new
Inclusion has become a priority on the global educational agenda,
This paper examines the apparent contradiction between the international community’s advocacy on responsibility to protect and the unwillingness to take responsibility based action in Darfur. The paper examines the factors responsible for international community’s reluctance in intervening in the Darfur conflict and its implication on Darfurians and the future of humanitarian intervention. We conclude that Darfur’s case shows that there is no correlation between the West’s strategic interest and its humanitarian concerns. Strategic imperative created perceived needs to appease Sudanese government as an important actor in the war of terrorism, while humanitarian concerns suggest the need for greater level of pressure against that government. This implies that we cannot assume that the West strategic interest in preventing state failure; will improve the norm of humanitarian intervention in every case. In the case of Darfur, perceived strategic interests reduced interventionist position.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
