Toward a Theoretical Model of Inclusive Teaching Strategies a An Action Research in an Inclusive Elementary Class

α
Dr. Suvi Lakkala
Dr. Suvi Lakkala
σ
Kaarina MAAttA
Kaarina MAAttA
α University of Lapland University of Lapland

Send Message

To: Author

Toward a Theoretical Model of Inclusive Teaching Strategies  a An Action Research in an Inclusive Elementary Class

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

DB308

Toward a Theoretical Model of Inclusive Teaching Strategies  a An Action Research in an Inclusive Elementary Class Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Inclusion at school can be seen constituting of small but significant issues, such as the participation in the learning community, the experiences of success, and studying and playing together with classmates. An instruction strategy which takes into consideration pupils’ different learning phases and aims to their participation was constructed in this research. As a theoretical framework, the Universal Design for Instruction (UDI) and Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development was applied. The study method was collaborative action research. The teacherresearcher collected the data during mathematics and mother tongue lessons in an inclusive elementary class and the study was a part of a large empiric development project that aimed at combining the knowledge and know-how from the fields of special education and general education into participatory basic education. Co-operative teaching was a crucial, underlying support for the strategy and the whole inclusive approach. The findings were explicated and drafted through examples of teaching and learning situations carried out during the research. In this study, a three-level framework for inclusive pedagogies was constructed.

References

54 Cites in Article
  1. H Aebli (1983). Zwölf Grundformen des Lehrens [Twelve basic forms of teaching.
  2. M Ainscow (2007). From special education to effective schools for all: a review of progress so far.
  3. M Ainscow (2007). Taking an inclusive turn.
  4. T Booth (2000). Progress in inclusive education.
  5. T Booth,M Ainscow (2002). Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools.
  6. H Bradbury,P Reason (2001). Conclusion: Broadening the bandwidth of validity: issues and choice-points for improving the quality of action research.
  7. J Bruner (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective.
  8. Mary Brydon-Miller,Davydd Greenwood,Patricia Maguire (2003). Why Action Research?.
  9. S Chaiklin (2003). The zone of proximal development in Vygotsky's analysis of learning and instruction.
  10. Y Chen,T Kao,J Sheu (2003). A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning.
  11. Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi,Jeremy Hunter (1992). Happiness in Everyday Life: The Uses of Experience Sampling.
  12. J Das (1998). PREP. PASS-teoriaan perustuva lukemisvalmiuksien harjaannuttamisohjelma.
  13. J Eskola,J Suoranta (2008). Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen [Introduction to qualitative research.
  14. Refael Feuerstein,S Feuerstein (1991). Introduction to the Theory of Mediated Learning Experience.
  15. H Haywood,Penelope Brooks,Susan Burns (1992). Stimulating Cognitive Development at Developmental Level: A Tested, Non-Remedial Preschool Curriculum for Preschoolers and Older Retarded Children.
  16. J Heron,P Reason (2001). The practise of cooperative inquiry: research with rather than on people.
  17. K Herr,G Anderson (2005). The action research dissertation. A guide for students and faculty.
  18. Anne Jordan,Paula Stanovich (2001). Patterns of Teacher‐Student Interaction in Inclusive Elementary Classrooms and Correlates with Student Self-Concept.
  19. I Järventie (2005). Millaisia lapsia tällaisina aikoina? [What kind of children we have these days?.
  20. J Kivirauma (2007). Timo Saloviidan rotuoppi [Timo Saloviita's theory of race.
  21. P Kluth,D Straut,D Biklen (2003). Access to academics for all students.
  22. J Kugelmass (2007). Constructivist views of learning: implications for inclusive education.
  23. Kristiina Kumpulainen,Mika Mutanen (1999). The situated dynamics of peer group interaction: an introduction to an analytic framework.
  24. M Kuorelahti,P Savolainen,E Puro (2004). Erityistä tukea ja erityisopetusta tarvitsevien peruskoululaisten opetuksen toimivuus Jyväsky REFERENCES RÉFÉRENCES REFERENCIAS.
  25. Martha Larkin (2001). Providing Support for Student Independence through Scaffolded Instruction.
  26. D Layder (1998). Sociological practise. Linking theory and social research.
  27. C Lidz (1987). Dynamic assessment.
  28. Bob Lingard (2007). Pedagogies of indifference.
  29. B Lingard,M Mills (2007). Pedagogies making a difference: issues of social justice and inclusion.
  30. J Mcguire,S Scott,S Shaw (2006). Universal Design and its applications in educational environments.
  31. N Mercer (2000). Conclusions.
  32. S Ohna (2005). Researching classroom processes of inclusion and exclusion.
  33. A Palinscar (1986). The Role of Dialogue in Providing Scaffolded Instruction.
  34. Susan Peters (2007). “Education for All?”.
  35. J Peterson,M Hittie (2003). Inclusive teaching. Creating effective schools for all learners.
  36. A Pollard (2005). Reflective teaching. Evidenceinformed professional practice.
  37. T Rantala (2005). Oppimisen iloa etsimässäkokemuksen etnografiaa alkuopetuksessa [Seeking the Joy of Learning -the Ethnography of Experience in Elementary Instruction.
  38. Helena Rasku-Puttonen,Anneli Eteläpelto,Maarit Arvaja,Päivi Häkkinen (2003). Is successful scaffolding an illusion? – Shifting patterns of responsibility and control in teacher-student interaction during a long-term learning project.
  39. S Ronkainen (2004). Kvantitatiivisuus, tulkinnallisuus ja feministinen tutkimus [Quantitativity, interpretativity, and feminist research.
  40. Feministinen tietäminen. Keskustelua metodologiasta [Feminist knowledge.
  41. Timo Saloviita,Simone Consegnati (2006). Teacher attitudes in Italy after 40 years of inclusion.
  42. T Saloviita,U Lehtinen,R Pirttimaa (1997). Sportinstitut der Universität Jyväskylä in Jyväskylä/ Etablissement sportif de l'université de Jyväskylä á Jyväskylä/ Athletics Department of the University of Jyväskylä in Jyväskylä.
  43. S Scott,J Mcguire,P Embry (2002). Universal design for instruction fact sheet.
  44. T Scruggs,M Mastropieri,K Mcduffie (2007). Co-teaching in inclusive classrooms: a metasynthesis of qualitative research.
  45. D Silverman (2006). Interpreting qualitative data.
  46. Roger Slee (2001). Social justice and the changing directions in educational research: the case of inclusive education.
  47. K Skårbrevik (2005). The quality of special education for students with special needs in ordinary classes.
  48. J Thousand,A Nevin,R Villa (2007). Collaborative teaching: critique of the scientific evidence.
  49. C Tomlinson (2005). The differentiated classroom. Responding to the needs of all learners.
  50. L Vygotsky (1979). Biographical Note on.
  51. S Väyrynen (2006). Kuka kuuluu mukaan ja ketä arvostetaan? Esimerkki osallistavien ja eiosallistavien käytänteiden suhteesta suomalaisessa ja eteläafrikkalaisessa koulussa [Who can paricipate and who is appreciated? An example of the relation between participatory and non-participatory practices at Finnish and southern African school.
  52. J Whitehead,J Mcniff (2006). Action research. Living theory.
  53. R Yin (1989). Case study research. design and methods. applied social research methods series.
  54. K Zeichner (1995). Educational action research.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Suvi Lakkala. 1970. \u201cToward a Theoretical Model of Inclusive Teaching Strategies a An Action Research in an Inclusive Elementary Class\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - B: Geography, Environmental Science & Disaster Management N/A (GJHSS Volume 11 Issue B8): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 11 Issue B8
Pg. 31- 40
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 20934
Total Downloads: 10961
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Inclusion at school can be seen constituting of small but significant issues, such as the participation in the learning community, the experiences of success, and studying and playing together with classmates. An instruction strategy which takes into consideration pupils’ different learning phases and aims to their participation was constructed in this research. As a theoretical framework, the Universal Design for Instruction (UDI) and Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development was applied. The study method was collaborative action research. The teacherresearcher collected the data during mathematics and mother tongue lessons in an inclusive elementary class and the study was a part of a large empiric development project that aimed at combining the knowledge and know-how from the fields of special education and general education into participatory basic education. Co-operative teaching was a crucial, underlying support for the strategy and the whole inclusive approach. The findings were explicated and drafted through examples of teaching and learning situations carried out during the research. In this study, a three-level framework for inclusive pedagogies was constructed.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Toward a Theoretical Model of Inclusive Teaching Strategies a An Action Research in an Inclusive Elementary Class

Dr. Suvi Lakkala
Dr. Suvi Lakkala University of Lapland
Kaarina MAAttA
Kaarina MAAttA

Research Journals