Criticism of the Average Allocation Mechanism and The Criticism of aoThe Criticism

Article ID

49OR5

Criticism of the Average Allocation Mechanism and The Criticism of aoThe Criticism

Dr. He Xiang Zhou
Dr. He Xiang Zhou Zhejiang University School of Business
DOI

Abstract

At the beginning of reform and opening up, Chinese society, for the accounting unit of the average distribution of the internal criticism of the theory and in practice, reflects the very good results, due to the existence of this concept to be sure the field is not correct, combined with the average distribution of the old barrier development of productive forces, in the “angrily denounced “the average allocation process, people seem to be intentionally or unintentionally, this criticism of the excessive expansion of the range, resulting in practice at the macro level, the distribution of income redistribution and, ultimately, was “efficiency first” cover look after the contrast between the different levels is too large, the amount of public interest from the material strength of the different evolved into distinct groups or classes. In the final analysis is due to a general criticism of the average distribution of the reasons, it must be evenly distributed in the critical resources through the definition of the property of the recource scientifically, for “equal distribution” under the cover of the income gap is too poor, or in the relevant areas of the distribution range of the average distribution of the concept of recovery to achieved through the scientific development goal of building a harmonious society.

Criticism of the Average Allocation Mechanism and The Criticism of aoThe Criticism

At the beginning of reform and opening up, Chinese society, for the accounting unit of the average distribution of the internal criticism of the theory and in practice, reflects the very good results, due to the existence of this concept to be sure the field is not correct, combined with the average distribution of the old barrier development of productive forces, in the “angrily denounced “the average allocation process, people seem to be intentionally or unintentionally, this criticism of the excessive expansion of the range, resulting in practice at the macro level, the distribution of income redistribution and, ultimately, was “efficiency first” cover look after the contrast between the different levels is too large, the amount of public interest from the material strength of the different evolved into distinct groups or classes. In the final analysis is due to a general criticism of the average distribution of the reasons, it must be evenly distributed in the critical resources through the definition of the property of the recource scientifically, for “equal distribution” under the cover of the income gap is too poor, or in the relevant areas of the distribution range of the average distribution of the concept of recovery to achieved through the scientific development goal of building a harmonious society.

Dr. He Xiang Zhou
Dr. He Xiang Zhou Zhejiang University School of Business

No Figures found in article.

Dr. He Xiang Zhou. 2012. “. Global Journal of Human-Social Science – A: Arts & Humanities GJHSS-A Volume 12 (GJHSS Volume 12 Issue A11): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 12 Issue A11
Pg. 15- 27
Classification
Not Found
Article Matrices
Total Views: 5228
Total Downloads: 2754
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Criticism of the Average Allocation Mechanism and The Criticism of aoThe Criticism

Dr. He Xiang Zhou
Dr. He Xiang Zhou Zhejiang University School of Business

Research Journals