Mommas Boys and Natures Girls: Explaining Differences in Risk Attitudes between Women and Men

Article ID

37P6D

Mommas Boys and Natures Girls: Explaining Differences in Risk Attitudes between Women and Men

NaRita D. Anderson
NaRita D. Anderson
MBA
MBA
Fred Fernatt
Fred Fernatt
MA
MA
MS
MS
Robert Rodermund
Robert Rodermund
MS
MS
Ronald A. Sages
Ronald A. Sages
Ph.D.
Ph.D.
John E. Grable
John E. Grable
Ph.D.
Ph.D.
DOI

Abstract

Extensive research shows that men report greater enjoyment and excitement from taking risks than do women. What remains to be answered is why women seem to exhibit risk attitudes that are less aggressive than men. In this paper, we apply aspects of power-control theory (PCT) as a theoretical foundation for explaining generalized risk-taking attitudes among women and men. We investigate the role of socialization from mothers in shaping the risk attitudes of their children. Using data from the NLSY, mothers were found to have little influence on the risk attitudes on daughters, although mothers’ SES may impart a profound influence on sons’ risk tolerances. It was also noted that children’s personality trait profiles were positively associated with their risk attitudes although the effects for boys differed from those of girls.

Mommas Boys and Natures Girls: Explaining Differences in Risk Attitudes between Women and Men

Extensive research shows that men report greater enjoyment and excitement from taking risks than do women. What remains to be answered is why women seem to exhibit risk attitudes that are less aggressive than men. In this paper, we apply aspects of power-control theory (PCT) as a theoretical foundation for explaining generalized risk-taking attitudes among women and men. We investigate the role of socialization from mothers in shaping the risk attitudes of their children. Using data from the NLSY, mothers were found to have little influence on the risk attitudes on daughters, although mothers’ SES may impart a profound influence on sons’ risk tolerances. It was also noted that children’s personality trait profiles were positively associated with their risk attitudes although the effects for boys differed from those of girls.

NaRita D. Anderson
NaRita D. Anderson
MBA
MBA
Fred Fernatt
Fred Fernatt
MA
MA
MS
MS
Robert Rodermund
Robert Rodermund
MS
MS
Ronald A. Sages
Ronald A. Sages
Ph.D.
Ph.D.
John E. Grable
John E. Grable
Ph.D.
Ph.D.

No Figures found in article.

Fred Fernatt Tax and Fin Sv. 2013. “. Global Journal of Human-Social Science – A: Arts & Humanities GJHSS-A Volume 12 (GJHSS Volume 12 Issue A15): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 12 Issue A15
Pg. 1- 10
Classification
Not Found
Article Matrices
Total Views: 5193
Total Downloads: 2718
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Mommas Boys and Natures Girls: Explaining Differences in Risk Attitudes between Women and Men

NaRita D. Anderson
NaRita D. Anderson
MBA
MBA
Fred Fernatt
Fred Fernatt
MA
MA
MS
MS
Robert Rodermund
Robert Rodermund
MS
MS
Ronald A. Sages
Ronald A. Sages
Ph.D.
Ph.D.
John E. Grable
John E. Grable
Ph.D.
Ph.D.

Research Journals