Insights from using the Approaches to Studying as an Evaluation Tool for Educational Resource Development

Article ID

9UCSF

Insights from using the Approaches to Studying as an Evaluation Tool for Educational Resource Development

Carol A. Speth
Carol A. Speth
Donald J. Lee
Donald J. Lee
DOI

Abstract

Over the past 12 years, an awareness of student characteristics has informed the design and interpretation of a series of research and evaluation studies in the Student Approaches to Learning (SAL) tradition. Instructors and developers of on-line learning objects have used the results to encourage active learning and implement better strategies. Addition of content learning items to the survey questions (along with evaluation questions and the 18-item ASSIST short form) made the questionnaire long enough to discourage completion. On some studies, two items ask about students’ conceptions of- and motivations for learning have served as proxies for Approach scores, because they can be interpreted in the context of previous research. Non-conventional ways of analyzing the data have evolved because approaches are not evenly distributed. Significance tests based on assumptions of treatment groups, each randomly sampled from a population, are not always appropriate in real course settings.

Insights from using the Approaches to Studying as an Evaluation Tool for Educational Resource Development

Over the past 12 years, an awareness of student characteristics has informed the design and interpretation of a series of research and evaluation studies in the Student Approaches to Learning (SAL) tradition. Instructors and developers of on-line learning objects have used the results to encourage active learning and implement better strategies. Addition of content learning items to the survey questions (along with evaluation questions and the 18-item ASSIST short form) made the questionnaire long enough to discourage completion. On some studies, two items ask about students’ conceptions of- and motivations for learning have served as proxies for Approach scores, because they can be interpreted in the context of previous research. Non-conventional ways of analyzing the data have evolved because approaches are not evenly distributed. Significance tests based on assumptions of treatment groups, each randomly sampled from a population, are not always appropriate in real course settings.

Carol A. Speth
Carol A. Speth
Donald J. Lee
Donald J. Lee

No Figures found in article.

carol_speth. 2013. “. Global Journal of Human-Social Science – G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 13 (GJHSS Volume 13 Issue G9): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 13 Issue G9
Pg. 33- 40
Classification
Not Found
Article Matrices
Total Views: 5043
Total Downloads: 2376
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Insights from using the Approaches to Studying as an Evaluation Tool for Educational Resource Development

Carol A. Speth
Carol A. Speth
Donald J. Lee
Donald J. Lee

Research Journals