The Causes and Minimization of Maritime Disasters on Passenger Vessels

The Causes and Minimization of Maritime Disasters on Passenger Vessels

Julius O. Anyanwu

Contact

Julius Okechukwu Anyanwu

Contact

Lazarus Okoroji

Contact

Federal University of Technology

The Causes and Minimization of Maritime Disasters on Passenger Vessels

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

O89CX

The Causes and Minimization of Maritime Disasters on Passenger Vessels Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The issue of maritime disaster has become very worrisome to all stakeholders of the maritime industry, particularly the main actors in the industry. The causes and the consequent effects of maritime disasters are so numerous hence justifies this research work. Research and statistics show that human error is to blame in over 70% of marine accidents. As a matter of need and concern to the researcher and the maritime industry, the researcher was angered to carry out this work on minimization of maritime disasters with the view of contributing to the way of minimizing this menace. Research problems were stated while research questions were also formulated in order to help address the problem statements of this subject. Statistical data were extracted from Mikael E and Oscar E. on Maritime disasters from 1852 to 2011. The data collected were analysed and findings were also made. The finding shows the causes and the effect of maritime disasters such as poor education and training, inadequate policies and procedures, external factors like bad weather, Technical factors like unavailability of advanced equipments like GMDSS, human factor and its effects such as financial loss to both, the ship owner and the nearby local communities is huge, loss of job, collision with an offshore structure or a port leads to infrastructure damage and thus cause a heavy blow to human efforts among others. Recommendations such as proper implementation of the latest STCW requirements, master took the proper measures (such as reduce speed, change course, go to a safe place, send distress signal, putting in place advanced technology systems that would reduce the risk of accidents were made at the end of the research to help curb this ugly menace.

References

27 Cites in Article

Reference Format

L Pendrill,A Allard,N Fischer,P Harris,J Nguyen,I Smith (2014). Full Issue Download Vol. 13 No. 1 2021 The Importance of the Measurement Infrastructure in Economic Recovery from the COVID-19 Pandemic Richard J. C. Brown , Fiona Auty, Eugenio Renedo, Mike King NCSLI Measure | Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021) | doi.org/10.51843/measure.13.1.1 Publisher NCSL International | Published February 2021 | Pages 18-21 Abstract: This paper describes the many, evidenced-based benefits to the economy of a well-developed measurement infrastructure. In particular, it explains how assuring confidence in measurement may be used to accelerate economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic including in emerging sectors such as the digital economy. Recommendations are made for providing near term support for national economic recovery whilst also demonstrating the advantages of sustained development of the measurement infrastructure in the medium-term to maximize the potential of future innovative and disruptive technologies. These recommendations, whilst focused on consideration of the UK, should apply globally. References: [1] G. Tassey, "Underinvestment in public good technologies," J Technol. Transfer, Vol. 30, pp. 89-113, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-004-4360-0 [2] M. King, and E. Renedo, "Achieving the 2.4% GDP target: The role of measurement in increasing investment in R&D and innovation," NPL Report IEA 3, NPL, Teddington, UK, March 2020. [3] M. King and G. Tellett, "The National Measurement System: A Customer Survey for Three of the Core Labs in the National Measurement System," NMS Customer Survey Report 2018, NPL Teddington, UK, April 2020 [4] H. Kunzmann, T. Pfeifer, R. Schmitt, H. Schwenke, and A.Weckenmann, "Productive metrology-adding value to manufacture," CIRP Annals, vol. 54, pp. 155-168, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60024-9 [5] N. G. Orji, R. G. Dixson, A. Cordes, B. D. Bunday, and J. A. Allgair, "Measurement traceability and quality assurance in a nanomanufacturing environment," Instrumentation, Metrology, and Standards for Nanomanufacturing III, Proceedings Vol. 7405, 740505, August 2009. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.826606 [6] Belmana, Analysis for Policy "Public Support for Innovation and Business Outcomes," Belmana: London, UK, 2020. [7] R. Hawkins, Standards, systems of innovation and policy in Handbook of Innovation and Standards. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2019. [8] N. Nwaigbo, and M. King, "Evaluating the Impact of the NMS Consultancy Projects on Supported Firms (Working Paper)" NPL, Teddington, UK, 2020. [9] M. King, R. Lambert, and P. Temple, Measurement, standards and productivity spillovers in Handbook of Innovation and Standards. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2017, p. 162. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783470082.00016 [10] A. Font, K. de Hoogh, M. Leal-Sanchez, D. C. Ashworth, R. J. C. Brown, A. L. Hansell, and G. W. Fuller, "Using metal ratios to detect emissions from municipal waste incinerators in ambient air pollution data," Atmos. Environ., vol. 113, pp. 177-186, July 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.05.002 [11] S. Giannis, M. R. L. Gower, G. D. Sims, G. Pask, and G. Edwards, "Increasing UK competitiveness by enhancing the composite materials regulatory infrastructure," NPL Report MAT 90, NPL, Teddington, UK, October 2019. [12] HM Government, UK Research and Development Roadmap, BEIS, London, July 2020. [13] M. R. Mehra, S. S. Desai, F. Ruschitzka, and A. N. Patel, "Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis," Lancet, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31180-6 (Print: ISSN 1931-5775) (Online: ISSN 2381-0580) ©2021 NCSL International Smart Power Supply Calibration System Iraj Vasaeli , Brandon Umansky NCSLI Measure | Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021) | doi.org/10.51843/measure.13.1.2 Publisher: NCSL International | Published February 2021 | Pages 22-27 Abstract: This paper details the development of an automated procedure to conduct calibrations of power supplies at Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (JPL). The fundamentals of power supply calibrations are given, and discussion on the method by which this custom software handles that calibration. Additionally, this technique provides real time uncertainty quantification of the calibrations. This automated system has demonstrated a time savings over existing automated techniques in use today. References: [1] Keysight, "Low-Profile Modular Power System Series N6700 Service Guide", Part Number: 5969 2938, Edition 7, January 2015. [2] B. N. Taylor and C. E. Kuyatt, "Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results", NIST Technical Note 1297, 1994. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.TN.1297 [3] JCGM, "Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement," first edition (GUM 1995 with minor corrections)," JCGM 100, 2008. (Print: ISSN 1931-5775) (Online: ISSN 2381-0580) © 2021 NCSL International Computer Aided Verification of Voltage Dips and Short Interruption Generators for Electromagnetic Compatibility Immunity Test in Accordance with IEC 61000-4-11: 2004 + AMD: 2017 Hau Wah Lai , Cho Man Tsui , Hing Wah Li NCSLI Measure | Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021) | doi.org/10.51843/measure.13.1.3 Publisher: NCSL International | Published February 2021 | Pages 28-39 Abstract: This paper describes a procedure and a computer-aided system developed by the Standards and Calibration Laboratory (SCL) for verification of voltage dip and short interruption generators in accordance with the international standard IEC 61000-4-11:2004+AMD1:2017. The verification is done by calibrating the specified parameters and comparing with the requirements stated in the standard. The parameters that should be calibrated are the ratios of the residual voltages to the rated voltage, the accuracy of the phase angle at switching, and the rise time, fall time, overshoot and undershoot of the switching waveform. A specially built adapter is used to convert the high voltage output waveforms of the generators to lower level signals to be acquired by a digital oscilloscope. The other circuits required for the testing are also provided. In addition, the paper discusses the uncertainty evaluations for the measured parameters. References: [1] T. Williams, and K. Armstrong, "EMC for Systems and Installations Part 6 - Low-Frequency Magnetics Fields (Emissions and Immunity) Mains Dips, Dropouts, Interruptions, Sags, Brownouts and Swells," EMC Compliance Journal, August 2000. [2] M.I. Montrose, and E. M. Nakauchi, Testing for EMC Compliance: Approaches and Techniques, Wiley Interscience, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/047164465X [3] International Standard IEC 61000-4-11:2004+AMD1:2017:Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Part 4-11: Testing and measurement techniques - Voltage dips, short interruptions and voltage variations immunity tests. [4] Evaluation of measurement data - Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, First Edition JCGM 100:2008. (Print: ISSN 1931-5775) (Online: ISSN 2381-0580) © 2021 NCSL International Validation of the Photometric Method Used for Micropipette Calibration Elsa Batista , Isabel Godinho, George Rodrigues, Doreen Rumery NCSLI Measure | Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021) | doi.org/10.51843/measure.13.1.4 Publisher: NCSL International | Published February 2021 | Pages 40-45 Abstract: There are two methods generally used for calibration of micropipettes: the gravimetric method described in ISO 8655-6:2002 and the photometric method described in ISO 8655-7:2005. In order to validate the photometric method, several micropipettes of different capacities from 0.1 µL to 1000 µL were calibrated using both methods (gravimetric and photometric) in two different laboratories, IPQ (Portuguese Institute for Quality) and Artel. These tests were performed by six different operators. The uncertainty for both methods was determined and it was verified that the uncertainty component that has a higher contribution to the final uncertainty budget depends on the volume delivered. In the photometric method for small volumes, the repeatability of the pipette is the largest uncertainty component, but for volumes, larger than 100 µL, the photometric instrument is the most significant source of uncertainty. Based on all the results obtained with this study, one may consider the photometric method validated. References: [1] ISO 8655-1/2/6/7, Piston-operated volumetric apparatus, 2002. [2] BIPM, International Vocabulary of Metrology, 3rd edition, JCGM 200:2012. [3] George Rodrigues, Bias and transferability in standards methods of pipette calibration, Artel, June 2003. [4] Taylor, et.al. The definition of primary method of measurement (PMM) of the 'highest metrological quality': a challenge in understanding and communication, Accred. Qual.Assur (2001) 6:103-106. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00010444 [5] EURAMET project 1353, Volume comparison on Calibration of micropipettes - Gravimetric and photometric methods. [6] ASTM E542: Standard Practice for Calibration of laboratory Volumetric Apparatus, 2000. [7] ISO 4787; Laboratory glassware - Volumetric glassware - Methods for use and testing of capacity, 2010 . [8] ISO 13528:2005 - Statistical methods used in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons. [9] BIPM et al, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM), 2nd ed., International Organization for Standardization, Genève, 1995. [10] EURAMET guide, cg 19, - Guidelines on the determination of uncertainty in gravimetric volume calibration, version 3.0, 2012. [11] E. Batista et all, A Study of Factors that Influence Micropipette Calibrations, Measure Vol. 10 No. 1, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1080/19315775.2015.11721717 [12] www.BIPM.org. (Print: ISSN 1931-5775) (Online: ISSN 2381-0580) © 2021 NCSL International Material Flow Rate Estimation in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing G. P. Greeff NCSLI Measure | Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021) | doi.org/10.51843/measure.13.1.5 Publisher: NCSL International | Published February 2021 | Pages 46-56 Abstract: The additive manufacturing of products promises exciting possibilities. Measurement methodologies, which measure an in-process dataset of these products and interpret the results, are essential. However, before developing such a level of quality assurance several in-process measurands must be realized. One of these is the material flow rate, or rate of adding material during the additive manufacturing process. Yet, measuring this rate directly in material extrusion additive manufacturing presents challenges. This work presents two indirect methods to estimate the volumetric flow rate at the liquefier exit in material extrusion, specifically in Fused Deposition Modeling or Fused Filament Fabrication. The methods are cost effective and may be applied in future sensor integration. The first method is an optical filament feed rate and width measurement and the second is based on the liquefier pressure. Both are used to indirectly estimate the volumetric flow rate. The work also includes a description of linking the G-code command to the final print result, which may be used to create a per extrusion command model of the part. References: [1] T. Wohlers, I. Campbell, O. Diegel, J. Kowen, I. Fidan, and D.L. Bourell, "Wohlers Report 2017: 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing State of the Industry Annual Worldwide Progress Report," 2017. [2] Additive manufacturing -- General principles -- Terminology. Geneva, CH: International Organization for Standardization, 2015. [3] R. Jones et al., "Reprap - The replicating rapid prototyper," Robotica, vol. 29, no. 1 SPEC. ISSUE, pp. 177-191, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1017/S026357471000069X [4] T. Wohlers and T. Gornet, "History of Additive Manufacturing 2017," 2017. [5] S. A. M. Tofail, E. P. Koumoulos, A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Bose, L. O'Donoghue, and C. Charitidis, "Additive manufacturing: scientific and technological challenges, market uptake and opportunities, "Materials Today, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 22-37, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.07.001 [6] G. Moroni and S. Petrò, "Managing uncertainty in the new manufacturing era," Procedia CIRP, vol. 75, pp. 1-2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.07.001 [7] R. Leach et al., "Information-rich manufacturing metrology,"in Eighth International Precision Assembly Seminar (IPAS), 2018, no. January. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05931-6_14 [8] S. Moylan, J. Slotwinski, A. Cooke, K. Jurrens, M. A. Donmez, and A. Donmez, "Proposal for a Standardized Test Artifact for Additive Manufacturing Machines and Processes," Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Proceedings, pp. 902-920, 2012. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.7858 [9] ASME Y14.46-2017 Product Definition for Additive Manufacturing. New York:The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2017. [10] H. Li, T. Wang, J. Sun, and Z. Yu, "The effect of process parameters in fused deposition modelling on bonding degree and mechanical properties," Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 80-92, Jan. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-06-2016-0090 [11] A. W. Gebisa and H. G. Lemu, "Investigating effects of Fused-deposition modeling (FDM) processing parameters on flexural properties of ULTEM 9085 using designed experiment, "Materials, vol.11, no. 4, pp. 1-23, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11040500 PMid:29584674 PMCid:PMC5951346 [12] B. Wittbrodt and J. M. Pearce, "The effects of PLA color on material properties of 3-D printed components," Additive Manufacturing, vol. 8, pp. 110-116, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2015.09.006 [13] O. A. Mohamed, S. H. Masood, and J. L. Bhowmik, "Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters: a review of current research and future prospects," Advances in Manufacturing, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 42-53, Mar. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-014-0097-7 [14] S. K. Everton, M. Hirsch, P. Stravroulakis, R. K. Leach and A. T. Clare, "Review of in-situ process monitoring and in-situ metrology for metal additive manufacturing," Materials and Design, vol. 95, pp. 431-445, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.099 [15] P. K. Rao, J. P. Liu, D. Roberson, Z. J. Kong, and C. Williams,"Online Real-Time Quality Monitoring in Additive Manufacturing Processes Using Heterogeneous Sensors," Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 137, no. 6, p.061007, Sep. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029823 [16] J. Pellegrino, T. Makila, S. McQueen, and E. Taylor, "Measurement science roadmap for polymer-based additive manufacturing," Gaithersburg, MD, Dec. 2016. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-5 [17] T. R. Kramer, F. M. Proctor, and E. Messina, "The NIST RS274NGC Interpreter -Version 3," Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2000. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.6556 [18] B. N. Turner, R. Strong, and S. A. Gold, "A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling," Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp.192-204, Apr. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-01-2013-0012 [19] Conrad Electronic, "Renkforce RF1000 3D Drucker," 2016. https://www.conrad.de/de/renkforce-rf1000-3d-drucker-single-extruder-inkl-software-franzis-designcad-v24-3d-printrenkforce-edition-1007508.html (accessed Sep. 20, 2016). [20] G. Hodgson, A. Ranellucci, and J. Moe, "Slic3r Manual - Flow Math," 2016. http://manual.slic3r.org/advanced/flow-math (accessed Jun. 21, 2016). [21] Repetier, "Repetier-Firmware Documentation." https://www.repetier.com/documentation/repetier firmware/repetier-firmware-introduction/ (accessed Apr. 17, 2018). [22] B. Weiss, D. W. Storti, and M. A. Ganter, "Low-cost closedloop control of a 3D printer gantry," Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 482-490, Aug. 2015, https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0108 [23] R. L. Zinniel and J. S. Batchelder, "Volumetric Feed Control for Flexible Filament," US 6085957, 2000. [24] W. J. Heij, Applied Metrology in Additive Manufacturing. Delft: Delft University of Technology, 2016. [25] G. P. Greeff and M. Schilling, "Closed loop control of slippage during filament transport in molten material extrusion," Additive Manufacturing, vol. 14, pp. 31-38, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.12.005 [26] G. P. Greeff, Applied Metrology in Additive Manufacturing, vol. 60. Berlin: Mensch und Buch, 2019. [27] G. P. Greeff and M. Schilling, "Comparing Retraction Methods with Volumetric Exit Flow Measurement in Molten Material Extrusion," in Special Interest Group meeting on Dimensional Accuracy and Surface Finish in Additive Manufacturing, 2017, no. October, pp. 70-74. [28] G. P. Greeff and M. Schilling, "Single print optimisation of fused filament fabrication parameters," The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Aug. 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-2518-4 [29] A. Bellini, S. Güçeri, and M. Bertoldi, "Liquefier Dynamics in Fused Deposition," Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 126, no. 2, p. 237, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1688377 [30] P. Virtanen et al., "SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python," Nature Methods, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 261-272, Mar. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 PMid:32015543 PMCid:PMC7056644 (Print: ISSN 1931-5775) (Online: ISSN 2381-0580) © 2021 NCSL International Software to Maximize End-User Uptake of Conformity Assessment with Measurement Uncertainty, Including Bivariate Cases. The European EMPIR CASoft Project.
Mats Alvesson (2002). Understanding Organizational Culture.
P Anderson (2005). ISM Code -A practical guide to the legal and insurance implications.
Axel Ax (2006). son Johnsons institut för sjörätt och annan transporträtt.
Selwyn Becker,Alice Eagly (2004). The Heroism of Women and Men..
C Cameron (2004). Unknown Title.
B Berg (2009). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences.
E Borg,J Westerlund (2006). Statistik för beteendevetare.
Alan Branch (2007). Elements of Shipping.
Terry Logan (1990). Ocean Disposal Systems for Sewage Sludge and Effluent.
B Garrick (1999). Risk assessment methodologies applicable to marine systems.
M Grabowski,J Merrick,J Harrald,Th Mazzuchi,J Rene Van (2000). Dorp risk modeling in distributed, large-scale systems.
M Grabowski (2010). Sailing on friday: developing the link between safety culture and performance in safety-critical systems.
E Hollnagel (2002). Understanding accidents-from root causes to performance variability.
Erik Hollnagel (2008). Risk+barriers=safety?.
Ed Joyce (2007). The Facts on File World Political Almanac: From 1945 to the Present. 4th ed.
Faulks (1990). Principles of Transport 4 th Edition.
B Frey,D Savage (2010). Torgler Interaction of natural survival instincts and internalized social norms exploring the Titanic and Lusitania disasters.
B Frey,D Savage,B Torgler (2011). Behavior under Extreme Conditions: The Titanic Disaster.
Wayne Hall (1986). Social class and survival on the S.S. Titanic.
(1996). Safety Investigation into Marine Casualties and Marine Incidents.
A Mawson (2005). Understanding mass panic and other collective responses to threat and disaster.
E Mickel,Oscar Gender, Social Norms and Survival in Maritime Disasters.
A Mullai (2004). A risk analysis framework for maritime transport of packaged dangerous goods.
Oscar Plogmark, Md,Carl Hjelte, Md,Max Olsson Bsph, Phd,Magnus Ekström, Md, Phd,Oskar Frånberg, Phd (2007). Decompression at 1.3 versus 1.6 bar and Nitrogen Elimination and Venous Gas Emboli: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
N Palmgren (1999). Foreword of managing risk in shipping.
P Trivedi (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Julius O. Anyanwu. 2014. \u201cThe Causes and Minimization of Maritime Disasters on Passenger Vessels\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - G: Industrial Engineering GJRE-G Volume 14 (GJRE Volume 14 Issue G2).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 14 Issue G2

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

disaster maritime minimization

Submission ReceivedDecember 6, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 20, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 102

Country: Nigeria

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - G: Industrial Engineering

Authors: Julius Okechukwu Anyanwu, Lazarus Okoroji (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 251

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4691

Total Downloads (simulated): 2415

Publish Date: 2014 06, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 31 views
Month 2: 54 views
Month 3: 30 views
Month 4: 61 views
Month 5: 61 views
Month 6: 51 views
Month 7: 47 views
Month 8: 36 views
Month 9: 26 views
Month 10: 28 views
Month 11: 41 views
Month 12: 29 views
Month 13: 31 views
Month 14: 25 views
Month 15: 27 views
Month 16: 47 views
Month 17: 29 views
Month 18: 34 views
Month 19: 40 views
Month 20: 32 views
Month 21: 35 views
Month 22: 35 views
Month 23: 29 views
Month 24: 29 views
Month 25: 37 views
Month 26: 40 views
Month 27: 29 views
Month 28: 33 views
Month 29: 34 views
Month 30: 24 views
Month 31: 34 views
Month 32: 11 views
Month 33: 18 views
Month 34: 28 views
Month 35: 34 views
Month 36: 39 views
Month 37: 32 views
Month 38: 27 views
Month 39: 28 views
Month 40: 32 views
Month 41: 24 views
Month 42: 17 views
Month 43: 21 views
Month 44: 21 views
Month 45: 48 views
Month 46: 38 views
Month 47: 24 views
Month 48: 30 views
Month 49: 18 views
Month 50: 17 views
Month 51: 18 views
Month 52: 33 views
Month 53: 29 views
Month 54: 11 views
Month 55: 33 views
Month 56: 24 views
Month 57: 23 views
Month 58: 24 views
Month 59: 45 views
Month 60: 20 views
Month 61: 29 views
Month 62: 26 views
Month 63: 37 views
Month 64: 39 views
Month 65: 36 views
Month 66: 23 views
Month 67: 30 views
Month 68: 32 views
Month 69: 25 views
Month 70: 15 views
Month 71: 43 views
Month 72: 24 views
Month 73: 44 views
Month 74: 35 views
Month 75: 21 views
Month 76: 26 views
Month 77: 25 views
Month 78: 30 views
Month 79: 26 views
Month 80: 35 views
Month 81: 47 views
Month 82: 21 views
Month 83: 29 views
Month 84: 27 views
Month 85: 30 views
Month 86: 17 views
Month 87: 24 views
Month 88: 19 views
Month 89: 30 views
Month 90: 22 views
Month 91: 29 views
Month 92: 33 views
Month 93: 26 views
Month 94: 20 views
Month 95: 41 views
Month 96: 36 views
Month 97: 10 views
Month 98: 28 views
Month 99: 32 views
Month 100: 29 views
Month 101: 33 views
Month 102: 23 views
Month 103: 15 views
Month 104: 27 views
Month 105: 37 views
Month 106: 24 views
Month 107: 25 views
Month 108: 29 views
Month 109: 28 views
Month 110: 44 views
Month 111: 44 views
Month 112: 41 views
Month 113: 35 views
Month 114: 34 views
Month 115: 36 views
Month 116: 37 views
Month 117: 22 views
Month 118: 32 views
Month 119: 33 views
Month 120: 30 views
Month 121: 22 views
Month 122: 33 views
Month 123: 27 views
Month 124: 28 views
Month 125: 21 views
Month 126: 33 views
Month 127: 32 views
Month 128: 40 views
Month 129: 26 views
Month 130: 29 views
Month 131: 28 views
Month 132: 37 views
Month 133: 34 views
Month 134: 18 views
Month 135: 46 views
Month 136: 32 views
Month 137: 53 views
Month 138: 15 views
Month 139: 46 views
Month 140: 24 views
Month 141: 83 views
Month 142: 70 views
Month 143: 54 views
Month 144: 17 views

Total Views: 4691

Total Downloads: 2415

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]