Radar Based Lie Detection Technique

Radar Based Lie Detection Technique

Kedar Nath Sahu

Contact

Dr. Challa Dhanunjay Naidu

Contact

Dr. K Jaya Sankar

Contact

Osmania University

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

11YQ3

Radar Based Lie Detection Technique Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The need for lie detection is to resolve disputes that arise over inheritance, forgery, impersonation as well as in forensic science which deals with application of science to law aiding to deliver justice by eliciting truth, scientific evaluation of physical evidence usually encountered in many civil, criminal regulatory and statutory cases. All the methods for lie detection including the most popular polygraph testing depend on the measurement of variation of physiological conditions like heart beat rate, respiratory rate (breath rate), etc. by establishing physical contact of some medical device with the person’s body and thus are invasive and obtrusive. But these physiological conditions vary due to the effect on the autonomic nervous system (ANS) for any reason irrespective of whether the person tells a lie or the person is innocent but feels nervous for being under test. This leads to an ambiguous and/or inaccurate decision about the person telling lies. A radar based lie detector proposed recently can be a remote, non-contact, non-invasive and unobtrusive method. This review paper summarizes the common signs of deceptive behavior, major non-radar based methods used earlier and finally, the radar based technique for lie detection that has emerged as a technical breakthrough in lie detection.

References

15 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Enrico Staderini (2003). An UWB Radar Based Stealthy ‘Lie Detector’.
E Lander (1989). DNA fingerprinting on trial.
L Simpson (1989). Fairfax, Sir James Reading, (17 Oct. 1834–29 March 1919), senior proprietor of the Sydney Morning Herald and the Sydney Mail.
Gtc Lambourne (1979). The Use of Fingerprints in Idntification.
Jerzy Kasprzak (1990). Possibilities of cheiloscopy.
A Parry,E Matthews P M ; Donchin,G Miller,L Farwell (1986). The Endogenous Components of the Event Related Potential-A diagnostic Tool.
Lawrence Farwell,Emanuel Donchin (1991). The Truth Will Out: Interrogative Polygraphy (“Lie Detection”) With Event‐Related Brain Potentials.
L Farwell,S Smith (2001). Using Brain MERMER Testing to Detect Knowledge Despite Efforts to Conceal.
E M Staderini (2002). UWB Radars in Medicine.
Ernest Haggard,Kenneth Isaacs (1966). Micromomentary facial expressions as indicators of ego mechanisms in psychotherapy.
How Lying Works by Tom Scheve.
Susan Adams (1996). FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, October 2009.
Paul Clikeman (2012). Signs of Deception.
Pav Lidis,T Loannis (2004). Lie detection using thermal imaging.
Skolnik Merrill,I (2007). Introduction to Radar Systems.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Kedar Nath Sahu. 2014. \u201cRadar Based Lie Detection Technique\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - F: Electrical & Electronic GJRE-F Volume 14 (GJRE Volume 14 Issue F5).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 14 Issue F5

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

brain fingerprinting ECG EEG f-MRI lie detection polygraph testing stealthy etc ultra-wideband (UWB) radar

Submission ReceivedDecember 7, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 4, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 113

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - F: Electrical & Electronic

Authors: Kedar Nath Sahu, Dr. Challa Dhanunjay Naidu, Dr. K Jaya Sankar (PhD/Dr. count: 2)

View Count (all-time): 287

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4882

Total Downloads (simulated): 2265

Publish Date: 2014 08, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 33 views
Month 2: 37 views
Month 3: 50 views
Month 4: 65 views
Month 5: 34 views
Month 6: 37 views
Month 7: 28 views
Month 8: 51 views
Month 9: 31 views
Month 10: 24 views
Month 11: 41 views
Month 12: 44 views
Month 13: 16 views
Month 14: 46 views
Month 15: 28 views
Month 16: 20 views
Month 17: 49 views
Month 18: 29 views
Month 19: 27 views
Month 20: 34 views
Month 21: 25 views
Month 22: 33 views
Month 23: 27 views
Month 24: 22 views
Month 25: 43 views
Month 26: 13 views
Month 27: 28 views
Month 28: 34 views
Month 29: 31 views
Month 30: 21 views
Month 31: 43 views
Month 32: 23 views
Month 33: 33 views
Month 34: 35 views
Month 35: 40 views
Month 36: 33 views
Month 37: 27 views
Month 38: 48 views
Month 39: 16 views
Month 40: 39 views
Month 41: 21 views
Month 42: 25 views
Month 43: 29 views
Month 44: 35 views
Month 45: 26 views
Month 46: 32 views
Month 47: 39 views
Month 48: 33 views
Month 49: 21 views
Month 50: 20 views
Month 51: 33 views
Month 52: 24 views
Month 53: 33 views
Month 54: 23 views
Month 55: 30 views
Month 56: 32 views
Month 57: 29 views
Month 58: 37 views
Month 59: 44 views
Month 60: 39 views
Month 61: 18 views
Month 62: 33 views
Month 63: 33 views
Month 64: 24 views
Month 65: 18 views
Month 66: 32 views
Month 67: 33 views
Month 68: 31 views
Month 69: 43 views
Month 70: 24 views
Month 71: 33 views
Month 72: 18 views
Month 73: 46 views
Month 74: 28 views
Month 75: 36 views
Month 76: 38 views
Month 77: 42 views
Month 78: 41 views
Month 79: 36 views
Month 80: 35 views
Month 81: 22 views
Month 82: 33 views
Month 83: 38 views
Month 84: 34 views
Month 85: 31 views
Month 86: 40 views
Month 87: 26 views
Month 88: 27 views
Month 89: 34 views
Month 90: 17 views
Month 91: 40 views
Month 92: 31 views
Month 93: 36 views
Month 94: 17 views
Month 95: 47 views
Month 96: 16 views
Month 97: 46 views
Month 98: 24 views
Month 99: 19 views
Month 100: 23 views
Month 101: 34 views
Month 102: 38 views
Month 103: 30 views
Month 104: 33 views
Month 105: 41 views
Month 106: 43 views
Month 107: 40 views
Month 108: 28 views
Month 109: 36 views
Month 110: 29 views
Month 111: 29 views
Month 112: 49 views
Month 113: 36 views
Month 114: 16 views
Month 115: 33 views
Month 116: 12 views
Month 117: 35 views
Month 118: 35 views
Month 119: 29 views
Month 120: 37 views
Month 121: 27 views
Month 122: 40 views
Month 123: 31 views
Month 124: 17 views
Month 125: 42 views
Month 126: 42 views
Month 127: 42 views
Month 128: 26 views
Month 129: 43 views
Month 130: 42 views
Month 131: 30 views
Month 132: 37 views
Month 133: 50 views
Month 134: 30 views
Month 135: 27 views
Month 136: 37 views
Month 137: 62 views
Month 138: 34 views
Month 139: 34 views
Month 140: 50 views
Month 141: 38 views
Month 142: 51 views

Total Views: 4882

Total Downloads: 2265

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]