Understanding Cosmic Temperature, Redshift, Growth Rate and Age in Stoney Scale Black Hole Cosmology

Article ID

SFRS85NE

Understanding Cosmic Temperature, Redshift, Growth Rate and Age in Stoney Scale Black Hole Cosmology

U. V. S. Seshavatharam
U. V. S. Seshavatharam
S. Lakshminarayana
S. Lakshminarayana
DOI

Abstract

If it is true that galaxy constitutes so many stars, each star constitutes so many hydrogen atoms and light is coming from the excited electron of hydrogen atom, then considering redshift as an index of ‘whole galaxy’ receding may not be reasonable. Clearly speaking, the observed cosmic redshift can be reinterpreted as an index of ‘cosmological’ thermodynamic light emission mechanism. During cosmic evolution, at any time in the past, in hydrogen atom- emitted photon energy was always inversely proportional to the CMBR temperature. Thus past light emitted from older galaxy’s excited hydrogen atom will show redshift with reference to the current laboratory data. Note that there will be no change in the energy of the emitted photon during its journey from the distant galaxy to the observer. As there is no observational or experimental evidence to Friedmann’s second assumption and as ‘critical density’ itself represents the density of ‘growing and light speed rotating black hole’, the density classification scheme of Friedmann cosmology must be reviewed at fundamental level and possibly can be relinquished. Rate of decrease in current ‘Hubble’s constant’ can be considered as a measure of current cosmic ‘rate of expansion’. If rate of decrease in current ‘Hubble’s constant is very small and is beyond the scope of current experimental verification, then the two possible states are: a) current ‘Hubble’s constant is decreasing at a very slow rate and current universe is expanding at a very slow rate and b) at present there is no ‘observable’ cosmic expansion or acceleration. To understand the ground reality, sensitivity and accuracy of current methods of estimating the magnitude of 0Hmust be improved and alternative methods must be developed. In this new direction by combining the basics of general theory of relativity, quantum mechanics and particle physics authors proposed 5 new methods for estimating the accurate value of 0H and can

Understanding Cosmic Temperature, Redshift, Growth Rate and Age in Stoney Scale Black Hole Cosmology

If it is true that galaxy constitutes so many stars, each star constitutes so many hydrogen atoms and light is coming from the excited electron of hydrogen atom, then considering redshift as an index of ‘whole galaxy’ receding may not be reasonable. Clearly speaking, the observed cosmic redshift can be reinterpreted as an index of ‘cosmological’ thermodynamic light emission mechanism. During cosmic evolution, at any time in the past, in hydrogen atom- emitted photon energy was always inversely proportional to the CMBR temperature. Thus past light emitted from older galaxy’s excited hydrogen atom will show redshift with reference to the current laboratory data. Note that there will be no change in the energy of the emitted photon during its journey from the distant galaxy to the observer. As there is no observational or experimental evidence to Friedmann’s second assumption and as ‘critical density’ itself represents the density of ‘growing and light speed rotating black hole’, the density classification scheme of Friedmann cosmology must be reviewed at fundamental level and possibly can be relinquished. Rate of decrease in current ‘Hubble’s constant’ can be considered as a measure of current cosmic ‘rate of expansion’. If rate of decrease in current ‘Hubble’s constant is very small and is beyond the scope of current experimental verification, then the two possible states are: a) current ‘Hubble’s constant is decreasing at a very slow rate and current universe is expanding at a very slow rate and b) at present there is no ‘observable’ cosmic expansion or acceleration. To understand the ground reality, sensitivity and accuracy of current methods of estimating the magnitude of 0Hmust be improved and alternative methods must be developed. In this new direction by combining the basics of general theory of relativity, quantum mechanics and particle physics authors proposed 5 new methods for estimating the accurate value of 0H and can

U. V. S. Seshavatharam
U. V. S. Seshavatharam
S. Lakshminarayana
S. Lakshminarayana

No Figures found in article.

Dr. U. V. S. Seshavatharam. 2014. “. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research – A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 14 (GJSFR Volume 14 Issue A4): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 14 Issue A4
Pg. 27- 47
Classification
Not Found
Article Matrices
Total Views: 4484
Total Downloads: 2300
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Understanding Cosmic Temperature, Redshift, Growth Rate and Age in Stoney Scale Black Hole Cosmology

U. V. S. Seshavatharam
U. V. S. Seshavatharam
S. Lakshminarayana
S. Lakshminarayana

Research Journals