Femicide and Rational Evaluation of the Evidence

Article ID

D683H

Female homicide research and forensic analysis for gender-based violence.

Femicide and Rational Evaluation of the Evidence

Jose L. Cusi Alanoca
Jose L. Cusi Alanoca
DOI

Abstract

In this article, the author presents the characteristics and conceptual criteria that should identify a femicide according to the original conception of Femicide -or Feminicide- of the English term Femicide, first developed by the feminist Diana Russell. First, the author contrasts the original conceptualization of femicide and the technical definition proposed by the legislator in the Bolivian Penal Code on the classification of the crime of femicide and then makes a critical analysis of it. Second, he states that the concept of femicide -or feminicide- alludes to specific criteria, for example, the misogynist murder of a woman because of her gender, simply because she is a woman. Third, the author analyzes the mental state test and its conceptualization. Fourthly, he analyzes the systems of valuation of evidence. Likewise, he analyzes the system of sound criticism as a corrective criterion of justification of the judicial decision. Finally, he analyzes the evaluation of evidence and the evidential reasoning to which the independent and impartial judge or court must adjust.

In this article, the author presents the characteristics and conceptual criteria that should identify a femicide according to the original conception of Femicide -or Feminicide- of the English term Femicide, first developed by the feminist Diana Russell. First, the author contrasts the original conceptualization of femicide and the technical definition proposed by the legislator in the Bolivian Penal Code on the classification of the crime of femicide and then makes a critical analysis of it. Second, he states that the concept of femicide -or feminicide- alludes to specific criteria, for example, the misogynist murder of a woman because of her gender, simply because she is a woman. Third, the author analyzes the mental state test and its conceptualization. Fourthly, he analyzes the systems of valuation of evidence. Likewise, he analyzes the system of sound criticism as a corrective criterion of justification of the judicial decision. Finally, he analyzes the evaluation of evidence and the evidential reasoning to which the independent and impartial judge or court must adjust.

Jose L. Cusi Alanoca
Jose L. Cusi Alanoca

No Figures found in article.

Jose L. Cusi Alanoca. 2026. “. Global Journal of Human-Social Science – H: Interdisciplinary GJHSS-H Volume 24 (GJHSS Volume 24 Issue H5): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Classification
Not Found
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 970
Total Downloads: 22
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Femicide and Rational Evaluation of the Evidence

Jose L. Cusi Alanoca
Jose L. Cusi Alanoca

Research Journals