Limiting Auditors Defenses in Negligence Lawsuits: Recent Developments in the Audit Interference Rule

Stephen E. Blythe
Stephen E. Blythe
Abu Dhabi University Abu Dhabi University

Send Message

To: Author

Limiting Auditors Defenses in Negligence Lawsuits: Recent Developments in the Audit Interference Rule

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

NW48V

Limiting Auditors Defenses in Negligence Lawsuits: Recent Developments in the Audit Interference Rule Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

Abstract

The objectives of this article are to: (1) define the audit interference rule (hereinafter “A.I.R.”) and describe its purpose; (2) summarize the historical case law pertinent to the A.I.R.; (3) delineate the U.S. states that recognize the A.I.R. from those that do not; (4) explain how the A.I.R. is impacted by the existence of a state’s comparative negligence statute; and (5) tell how recent developments in case law are affecting the A.I.R. The purpose of the A.I.R. is to limit the scope of an auditor’s contributory negligence defense in a negligence lawsuit filed by a client. The A.I.R. provides that the client’s negligence is a defense only when it has contributed to the accountant’s failure to perform his contract and to report the truth. New York was the first state to recognize the A.I.R.

References

44 Cites in Article
  1. Stull V,Ragsdale Unknown Title.
  2. (1981). Unknown Title.
  3. (2007). Reilly, Mary Margaret, (born 22 May 1953), Partner, Deloitte (formerly Deloitte & Touche) LLP, 1987–2013.
  4. (1996). Unknown Title.
  5. Halla Nursery,V Baumann-Furrie,& Co (1990). Unknown Title.
  6. (1220). Arbitration and Award. In General. Court Determines Questions of Coverage and Liability despite Arbitration Clause in Standard Uninsured Motorist Provision. Cruger v. Allstate Ins. Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964).
  7. Hawkins (1959). Non-audit liability of accountants.
  8. Menzel (1983). CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE OF PATIENT AS DEFENSE TO CHARGE OF MALPRACTICE..
  9. Note The Peculiar Treatment of Contributory Negligence in Accountants' Liability Cases.
  10. N (1990). Legal Cases.
  11. (2003). Unknown Title.
  12. (1985). Unknown Title.
  13. Louise Hall (1956). New Threat to Washington Landmark.
  14. Mayer Hoffman,Mccann (2010). Unknown Title.
  15. Comeau Rupp (1992). U.
  16. (2015). Comerica.
  17. C (1930). Unknown Title.
  18. (1220). Arbitration and Award. In General. Court Determines Questions of Coverage and Liability despite Arbitration Clause in Standard Uninsured Motorist Provision. Cruger v. Allstate Ins. Co. (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1964).
  19. Unknown Title.
  20. E Ark (1992). Unknown Title.
  21. Fullmer V,Wohlfeiler,Beck (1990). Unknown Title.
  22. Logan Greenstein,V Co,Burgess,Marketing (1987). Quarterly progress report, April--June 1976.
  23. Trust Co (2012). Whineray, Sir Wilson (James), (10 July 1935–22 Oct. 2012), Chairman, National Bank of New Zealand Ltd, 1998–2004 (Director, 1993–2004).
  24. Hall,Co (2003). Materials index.
  25. (1989). Unknown Title.
  26. Halla Nursery,V Baumann-Furrie,& Co (1990). Unknown Title.
  27. Jack Greenberg (1999). Unknown Title.
  28. Jenia Iontcheva (2001). Sovereignty on Our Terms: In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, 120 F. Supp. 2d 45 (D. D. C. 2000).
  29. S (2009). Lectureabstracts Antwerpen 2009.
  30. (2001). IN RE: DELTA INVESTMENTS & DEVELOPMENT, LLC Case No. 12-01160-NPO (Bankr. S.D. Miss. Jan. 8, 2019).
  31. Jewelcor Jewelers,& Distrib (1988). Unknown Title.
  32. Lincoln Grain Unknown Title.
  33. (1984). Unknown Title.
  34. (1939). Unknown Title.
  35. Pnc Bank,Inc Kentucky (2011). PNC Inc - Printed Circuit Board Manufacturer.
  36. W Pa (1994). Unknown Title.
  37. Schein Ernst,Young Unknown Title.
  38. Shapiro V Unknown Title.
  39. S (1974). Unknown Title.
  40. & Stroud V. Arthur Andersen,Co (2001). Unknown Title.
  41. Stull V,Ragsdale Unknown Title.
  42. (1981). Appendix D..
  43. (2020). Erratum.
  44. Hannah Calkins (1987). State Beat: Texas Psychological Association fights to keep state psychology board independent.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Stephen E. Blythe. 2013. \u201cLimiting Auditors Defenses in Negligence Lawsuits: Recent Developments in the Audit Interference Rule\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - D: Accounting & Auditing GJMBR-D Volume 13 (GJMBR Volume 13 Issue D4).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
August 6, 2013

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4833
Total Downloads: 2554
2026 Trends
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Limiting Auditors Defenses in Negligence Lawsuits: Recent Developments in the Audit Interference Rule

Stephen E. Blythe
Stephen E. Blythe <p>Abu Dhabi University</p>

Research Journals