Ayanita Banerjee
South Asian Studies and Diaspora Indian History and Philosophy Philosophy of social science South Asian Studies and Conflicts Online and Blended Learning Neuroscience and Music Perception Diaspora, migration, transnational identity Music Therapy and Health General Social Sciences Philosophy Political Science and International Relations Education Cognitive Neuroscience Demography Social Psychology

Bio

Dr. Ayanita Banerjee is a scholar affiliated with the University of Engineering and Management in India, focusing on diverse research areas including South Asian studies, philosophy, social sciences, education, cognitive neuroscience, and political science. She holds a Ph.D. in English and has contributed to academic discourse through research and peer review, emphasizing interdisciplinary approaches that span history, philosophy, and social identity studies.

Experience

University of Engineering & Management

2021 - 2022

Editors Role

Reviewer

GJCST

2024 - Present

Affiliations

Calcutta University

Fellow

Member since 2023

Grants and Awards

FELLOWSHIP

Fellowship Award

Calcutta University

2023 6800 USD

Research

(Re)-defining Chitrangada- The Queer Journey from Tagore to Rituparno Ghosh

Article January 23, 2026

The third gender identity, in India, has always been disparaged by the heterosexuals. The survival of “third gender” can be traced in the rudimentary Vedic literatures of India, where, as per prakriti or nature, gender has been clearly divided into pums-prakriti or male, stri-prakriti or female, and tritiya-prakriti or the third sex. The third sex is considered as an intrinsic union of the male and female natures so intensely that they cannot be marked as male or female in the collective sense. The interaction of “gender” and “sex” creates a problem as both are frequently considered the same. The word “sex” denotes biological sex and “gender” as psychological behaviour and identity. The term prakriti or nature conversely implies both facets in concert as one intricately entwined and cohesive unit. Hence the “heterosexual matrix” — an ideal order between sex, gender, and sexuality generated during the modern era (Butler 1990), not only categorized gender borderlines, but promoted the gender order as being implicitly heterosexual.

Nature, Freedom and Pedagogy-A Comparative Analysis of Rousseau and Tagore

Article May 22, 2021

Naturalism, the philosophy of Nature which subordinates mind and spirit to matter denies belief in the Supernatural and the Spiritual. While Idealism idolizes the ‘Mind’ or the ‘Self’, Naturalism emphasizes ‘matter’ and the physical world. Unlike the Idealists’ claim substantiating that “God alone is the true agreement of concept [Begriff] and reality [Realitát]; all finite [endlichen] things involve some untruth [Unwahrheit], they have a concept and an existence [Existenz] which are incommensurable”1, the Naturalists say that the ultimate reality is ‘matter’ which manifests itself in the form of ‘Nature’. According to this philosophy ‘the material world’ or ‘the physical world’ or ‘Nature’ is the only real world that can be comprehended through human senses and unfurled through scientific investigations. ‘Atom’, ‘Empty’ space and ‘Motion’ are the three postulates on the basis of which the entire Nature and the phenomena of the Universe can be explained. As Ernest Hocking writes