Bio
Jesus António Tomé is a distinguished professor and researcher at Universidade Agostinho Neto (Agostinho Neto University) in Luanda, Angola. Holding a PhD in Philosophy with a specialization in Ethics and Politics, his scholarly work focuses on the intricate dynamics of citizenship rights, hegemony, and democracy in contemporary Africa. His notable publications include 'Limitations of the Reconfiguration and Applicability of Citizenship Rights in the Mixed Model of Hegemony and Democracy Underway in Contemporary Africa' and 'National Appropriation of the Notions of Citizenship and Peace considering the International Agenda in the Post-Civil War Context in Angola.' With a strong commitment to academic excellence, Dr. Tomé serves as a reviewer for several international journals and has contributed to the advancement of political philosophy and social sciences. His research has garnered attention, with 3 publications and 2 citations, reflecting his impact on the field. Dr. Tomé continues to explore the complexities of governance and citizenship in post-conflict societies, making significant contributions to the understanding of African political systems.
Educational Journey
Agostinho Neto
Professor universitário
Experience
Editors Role
Reviewer
GJMBR
0 -Research
Limitations of the Reconfiguration and Applicability of Citizenship Rights in the Mixed Model of Hegemony and Democracy Underway in Contemporary Africa
This study, which has as its problematic the analysis of the dynamic developments of citizenship rights on the African continent, from the fall of authoritarian state institutions to the context of democratic openings, aims to show the limitations that exist within the scope of the reconfiguration and applicability of citizenship rights in contemporary Africa due to the adoption of ambiguous political models that are simultaneously hegemonic and democratic. This study is a qualitative, theoretical approach, developed through exploratory bibliographic research. The results indicate that the democracy achieved in Africa reveals a democratic and an authoritarian nature, as a result of the presence of non-democratic elements that have accompanied the different political systems tested on the continent, in which the degree of applicability of rights of Citizenship depends on the ruling elite and the perceived level of threat to their maintenance in power. From these results, we conclude that, even so, in this context, it is relatively early to declare the failure or success of both democracy and citizenship rights. For all intents and purposes, this is a process under definition whose contours are not yet entirely fixed, and it is naturally not possible to exclude the possibility that, as in the past, other options will be tested, perhaps less democratic and, as a consequence of this , less favorable to promoting the values and practices of citizenship.
