Computer-Aided Implant Surgery: A Literature Review

Lauren Bohner

Computer-Aided Implant Surgery: A Literature Review

Lauren Bohner *

Contact

Rafael Prestes

Contact

Eduardo Mukai

Contact

Sueli Mukai

Contact

Rogério de Lima Romeiro

Contact

Computer-Aided Implant Surgery: A Literature Review

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

ACJTP

Computer-Aided Implant Surgery: A Literature Review Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Purpose: To update the literature regarding the computer-aided implant surgery. Material and Methods: A literature search was applied in electronic database using the key-words: “Guided surgery”, “dental implants”, “computer-aided surgery”, “stereolito- graphic guides”. Results: The procedure involves the use of diagnostic imaging and CAD – CAM technology with the purpose of obtaining a surgical guide, which transfers the virtual implant planning to the surgical field. The technique allows to couple the desired prosthesis into the anatomical structures in order to determine the implant positioning. Thus, the method provides greater safety during surgery, accurate knowledge about position of anatomical structures and their relationship to the future prosthesis. Besides, it allows a flapless surgery, providing a shorter surgical time and reducing the post-surgical discomfort. Conclusion: Guided surgery requires specialized knowledge and high standards of care. However, when performed in accordance with patient´s specific needs, it may represent a faster and safety procedure.

References

21 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. P. Tortamano,CamargoLO,M. Bello-Silva,L. Kanashiro (2010). Immediate implant placement and restoration in the esthetic zone: a prospective study with 18 months of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 25, 345-350.
2. N. Carvalho,Slmb Gonçalves,Cmf Guerra,Afp Carreiro (2006). Treatment Planning in Implantology: A Contemporary View. Traumatol Buco-Maxilo-Fac, 22(3), 17-22.
CrossRef DOI
3. Minkle Gulati,Vishal Anand,Sanjeevkumar Salaria,Nikil Jain,Shilpi Gupta (2015). Computerized implant dentistry: advances toward automation J Indian Soc Periodontol. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 19(1), 5.
CrossRef DOI
4. N. Assche,M. Vercruyssen,W. Coucke,W. Teughels,R. Jacobs,M. Quyrnien (2012). Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement Clin Oral Implants Res. Clin Oral Implants Res, 23, 122-123.
5. Alex Greenberg (2015). Digital Technologies for Dental Implant Treatment Planning and Guided Surgery. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America, 27(2), 319-340.
CrossRef DOI
6. Michael Bornstein,Bilal Nawas,Ulrike Kuchler,Ali Tahmaseb (2014). Consensus Statements and Recommended Clinical Procedures Regarding Contemporary Surgical and Radiographic Techniques in Implant Dentistry. The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 29(Supplement), 78-82.
CrossRef DOI
7. B. Yilmas (2015). Incorporating digital scans of diagnostic casts into computed tomography for virtual implant treatment planning.
8. Scott Ganz (2015). Three-Dimensional Imaging and Guided Surgery for Dental Implants. Dental Clinics of North America, 59(2), 265-290.
CrossRef DOI
9. Patel N (2010). Integrating Three-Dimensional Digital Technologies for Comprehensive Implant Dentistry. JADA, 141, 20-24.
10. Reyes A,Turkylmaz I,Prihoda TJ (2015). Accuracy of surgical guides made from conventional and a combination of digital scanning and rapid prototyping techniques J Prosthet Dent. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 113(4), 295-303.
CrossRef DOI
11. Raico Gallardo,Y.,Rodrigues Teixeirada da Silva- Olivio,I. Mukai,E. Morimoto,S. Sesma,N. Cordaro,L. (2016). Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res
CrossRef DOI
12. Katsoulis J,Panzera P,Mericske-Stern R (2009). Prosthetically Driven, Computer‐Guided Implant Planning for the Edentulous Maxilla: A Model Study. Clin ImpDent Rel Res, 11, 238-244.
13. Margareta Hultin,Krister Svensson,Mats Trulsson (2012). Clinical advantages of computer‐guided implant placement: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(s6), 124-135.
CrossRef DOI
14. David Schneider,Pascal Marquardt,Marcel Zwahlen,Ronald Jung (2009). A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer‐guided template‐based implant dentistry. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20(s4), 73-86.
CrossRef DOI
15. Arisan V,Karabuda CZ,Ozdemir T (2010). Implant surgery using bone‐ and mucosa‐supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post‐operative outcomes of computer‐aided vs. standard techniques. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 21(9), 980-988.
CrossRef DOI
16. Arisan V,Karabuda ZC,Piskin B,Ozdemir T (2015). Conventional multi-slice computed tomography (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) for computer-aided implant placement.Part II: Reliability of mucosasupported stereolithographic guides. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 15, 907-914.
17. Pettersson A,Kero T,Gillot L,Cannas B,Faldt J,Soderberg R,Nasstrom K (2010). Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I. J Prosthet Dent, 103, 335-342.
18. Alberto Sicilia,Daniele Botticelli (2012). Computer‐guided implant therapy and soft‐ and hard‐tissue aspects. The Third EAO Consensus Conference 2012. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(s6), 157-161.
CrossRef DOI
19. Christoph Vasak,Georg Watzak,André Gahleitner,Georg Strbac,Michael Schemper,Werner Zechner (2011). Computed tomography‐based evaluation of template (Nobel Guide™)‐guided implant positions: a prospective radiological study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 22(10), 1157-1163.
CrossRef DOI
20. Di GA,Silva JV,Silva GH,Cury PR,Szarf G (2012). Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation. J Periodontol, 83(4), 410-419.
CrossRef DOI
21. Champleboux Fortin T,Coudert Lormee J (2000). Precise dental implant placement in bone using surgical guides in conjunction with medical imaging techniques. J Oral Imp, 26, 300-303.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Lauren Bohner, Rafael Prestes, Eduardo Mukai, Sueli Mukai, Rogério de Lima Romeiro. 2016. "Computer-Aided Implant Surgery: A Literature Review". Global Journal of Medical Research - J: Dentistry & Otolaryngology GJMR-J Volume 16 (GJMR Volume 16 Issue 35 (J3)).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMR Volume 16 Issue 35 (J3)

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords

guided surgery surgical template virtual planning

Classification

GJMR-J Classification NLMC Code: WF 350

Submission ReceivedDecember 11, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2016
Published October 18, 2016

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

October 18, 2016

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 115

Country: Germany

Subject: Global Journal of Medical Research - J: Dentistry & Otolaryngology

Authors: Lauren Bohner, Rafael Prestes, Eduardo Mukai, Sueli Mukai, Rogrio de Lima Romeiro (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 1838

Total Views (Real + Logic): 2363

Total Downloads (simulated): 172

Publish Date: 2016 10, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 34 views
Month 2: 63 views
Month 3: 47 views
Month 4: 32 views
Month 5: 31 views
Month 6: 29 views
Month 7: 51 views
Month 8: 48 views
Month 9: 39 views
Month 10: 29 views
Month 11: 27 views
Month 12: 26 views
Month 13: 20 views
Month 14: 41 views
Month 15: 45 views
Month 16: 15 views
Month 17: 26 views
Month 18: 24 views
Month 19: 31 views
Month 20: 24 views
Month 21: 43 views
Month 22: 31 views
Month 23: 30 views
Month 24: 21 views
Month 25: 28 views
Month 26: 27 views
Month 27: 31 views
Month 28: 31 views
Month 29: 28 views
Month 30: 35 views
Month 31: 22 views
Month 32: 40 views
Month 33: 28 views
Month 34: 35 views
Month 35: 25 views
Month 36: 32 views
Month 37: 30 views
Month 38: 41 views
Month 39: 21 views
Month 40: 38 views
Month 41: 20 views
Month 42: 26 views
Month 43: 40 views
Month 44: 21 views
Month 45: 27 views
Month 46: 36 views
Month 47: 34 views
Month 48: 20 views
Month 49: 35 views
Month 50: 44 views
Month 51: 41 views
Month 52: 16 views
Month 53: 32 views
Month 54: 19 views
Month 55: 35 views
Month 56: 32 views
Month 57: 41 views
Month 58: 17 views
Month 59: 20 views
Month 60: 31 views
Month 61: 23 views
Month 62: 30 views
Month 63: 43 views
Month 64: 42 views
Month 65: 26 views
Month 66: 14 views
Month 67: 32 views
Month 68: 35 views
Month 69: 15 views
Month 70: 39 views
Month 71: 37 views
Month 72: 26 views
Month 73: 25 views
Month 74: 19 views
Month 75: 15 views
Month 76: 29 views
Month 77: 32 views
Month 78: 18 views
Month 79: 18 views
Month 80: 31 views
Month 81: 27 views
Month 82: 10 views
Month 83: 39 views
Month 84: 38 views
Month 85: 25 views
Month 86: 24 views
Month 87: 24 views
Month 88: 34 views
Month 89: 35 views
Month 90: 27 views
Month 91: 25 views
Month 92: 41 views
Month 93: 34 views
Month 94: 14 views
Month 95: 37 views
Month 96: 21 views
Month 97: 27 views
Month 98: 39 views
Month 99: 29 views
Month 100: 41 views
Month 101: 30 views
Month 102: 46 views
Month 103: 21 views
Month 104: 32 views
Month 105: 37 views
Month 106: 36 views
Month 107: 23 views
Month 108: 18 views
Month 109: 46 views
Month 110: 20 views
Month 111: 259 views
Month 112: 278 views
Month 113: 100 views
Month 114: 70 views
Month 115: 56 views
Month 116: 38 views
Month 117: 40 views
Month 118: 27 views
Month 119: 20 views
Month 120: 23 views
Month 121: 43 views

Total Views: 2.4K

Total Downloads: 172

All Trends