Research Implementation
Research implementation refers to the systematic processes, strategies and efforts by which evidence-based research findings, interventions or technologies are adopted, integrated and sustained in real-world settings. It explores how and why research outcomes move (or fail to move) from controlled settings into practical use. For example, in health research, it is defined as “the scientific study of methods to promote the integration of research findings and evidence-based interventions into policy and practice”.
From Discovery to Deployment - Making Research Work in the Real World From Discovery to Deployment - Making Research Work in the Real World
What Is Research Implementation?
Why Research Implementation Matters
- Bridging the “Know-Do” Gap
- Many research discoveries remain unused because of barriers in translation to practice; implementation addresses that gap.
- Maximising Impact
- When implementation is effective, research leads to tangible benefits: better technologies, improved systems, policies, services, or products. Conversely, poor implementation often leads to minimal or no benefit despite rigorous research.
- Enhancing Global Equity & Reach
- For a publisher operating across 130+ countries, ensuring research is implementable in diverse contexts (including low- and middle-income settings) is key to fulfilling global mission.
- Strengthening Sustainability
- Implementation looks beyond initial proof-of-concept to long-term integration, adaptation and scale-up in different settings and cultures.
What You’ll Find Here
- Implementation Cases & Success Stories
- Real-world examples of research published through Global Journals® (or collaborating partners) that have been implemented, scaled or integrated into practice/industry.
- Implementation Frameworks & Tools
- Guidance on frameworks (e.g., RE‑AIM framework, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)) and strategies for assessing context, barriers and enablers.
- Author & Researcher Guidance
- How authors can design articles with implementation in mind: considering stakeholder engagement, adaptation, metrics of adoption, fidelity, sustainability.
- Institutional & Technology Transfer Supporty
- Resources for research institutions, industry partners and funders on taking published findings through pilot, field-testing, commercialisation or policy adoption.
- Metrics & Monitoring
- Tools and indicators to assess implementation outcomes (e.g., adoption, fidelity, reach, sustainability) and track the real-world performance of research-derived interventions.
Key Components of a Strong Research Implementation Strategy
- Key Components of a Strong Research Implementation Strategy
- Context & Setting
- Converting your manuscript into eBook formats (EPUB, MOBI, PDF) with responsive layout, correct metadata, embedded images, and compatibility across devices (readers, tablets, phones).
- Implementation Strategy
- Designing an appealing, professional cover, front/back cover layout, and incorporating graphical elements or branding that match quality standards.
- Adaptation & Fidelity
- Assigning ISBNs if needed, preparing metadata (title, authors, description, keywords, subject categories), and ensuring discoverability via indexing in catalogs and online stores.
- Stakeholder Engagement & Ownership
- Publishing via major eBook retailers and platforms (Amazon Kindle, Apple Books, Kobo, Google Play) or aggregators, and managing file submissions, DRM settings, and royalty setup.
- Monitoring & Evaluation of Implementation Outcomes
- Checking for format issues (line breaks, image scaling, table rendering), hyperlink functionality, navigation (table of contents), and reading experience across devices.
- Scale-up & Sustainability
- Enabling future updates, corrections, or new editions easily, one advantage of eBooks is their flexibility to evolve
- Reporting & Feedback Loop
- Creating promotional assets (preview snippets, social media banners, author summaries), coordinating launch campaigns, and assisting with listing optimization.
Why Global Journals® Supports Research Implementation
How to Incorporate Research Implementation in Your Submission
- When drafting your manuscript, include a section (or a parallel “implementation plan”) describing how your findings could be adopted or adapted in practice, industry, policy or systems.
- Use or reference an implementation framework (for example CFIR, RE-AIM) to guide your strategy and monitoring.
- Engage key stakeholders during your research design, practitioners, implementers, end-users, policy-makers, to ensure relevance and feasibility.
- Plan and report on implementation-specific outcomes where possible (e.g., adoption rate, fidelity, sustainability) in addition to efficacy or effectiveness.
- In your article’s “Impact Summary” or “Lay Summary”, explicitly highlight how your research could be implemented, what barriers might exist and what adoption path may look like.
- Post-publication, you may submit follow-up Implementation Reports to our platform: documenting what happened after publication, what adaptations were made, lessons learned and outcomes achieved.
Making Research Work for the World
FAQs
What exactly is “Research Implementation” ?
Research Implementation focuses on how research findings, interventions or technologies move from discovery into actual use in real-world settings, including how they are adopted, integrated, scaled and sustained. For example, implementation research is defined as “the scientific study of the processes used to implement policies and interventions and the contextual factors that affect these processes.”
How does ‘implementation’ differ from simply publishing a research article?
Publishing is about disseminating findings; implementation is about applying those findings in practice. It asks: How do we make this research work in the actual world - what helps, what hinders, and how can we ensure sustained use.
Why is implementation important for technology / engineering / applied research?
Because without implementation, even the best research may not deliver real-world benefits. Implementation addresses the “know-do” gap - bridging what is known in research to what is done in practice or in industry. This is especially critical for technology, engineering, policy and cross-disciplinary work.
What are common barriers to effective implementation?
Typical obstacles include: context mis-match (what works in one place may not in another), inadequate resources or infrastructure, poor stakeholder engagement, lack of training/support, the intervention not being adapted for local settings, sustainability issues, and weak monitoring and evaluation systems.
How should authors integrate implementation thinking into their research article or project?
Authors should consider from the outset: who the end users are, what setting the intervention will be applied in, what barriers or enablers exist, how adoption/adaptation will be handled, what metrics of implementation success will be used (e.g., adoption rate, fidelity, reach, sustainability). Including a section on implementation strategy in the manuscript is helpful.
What frameworks or models help guide implementation research?
Some widely used frameworks include:
RE‑AIM framework: Reach / Effectiveness / Adoption / Implementation / Maintenance.
CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research): considering domains like outer/inner setting, characteristics of individuals, process etc.
What kind of outcomes or metrics does implementation research use?
Implementation research tends to track outcomes beyond traditional efficacy (does the intervention work?), instead focusing on: reach (how many were reached), adoption (by organisations/users), fidelity (was it delivered as intended), sustainability (does it continue over time), cost of implementation, acceptability, feasibility, penetration.
Is implementation research only for health / medicine?
No, while much of the foundational literature comes from health and public-health contexts, the principles apply to any discipline (engineering, technology, business, social sciences) where research findings must be taken up in real-world settings. Implementation concerns are universal to applied research.
What role do stakeholders (practitioners, industry, policymakers) play in implementation?
They play a critical role, effective implementation requires stakeholder engagement to understand context, needs, readiness, resources, and to adapt the intervention accordingly. Without stakeholder buy-in, excellent research may fail to be used.
Can I submit to Global Journals® a paper that emphasises implementation rather than only discovery?
Yes, we welcome papers that go beyond “we found X” and address “how X can be applied”, “how X was implemented/tested in a real-setting”, “what barriers were encountered and how they were overcome”, and “what the adoption, scalability and sustainability look like”.
What if my research is still at the “proof-of-concept” stage rather than full implementation?
That’s still valuable. It’s helpful if you clearly state the forthcoming implementation strategy, potential users and settings, and what steps or pilot work are planned. You can also outline potential challenges and next-steps toward full implementation.
Does implementation research require different methods than traditional research?
Often yes, implementation research may involve mixed methods (quantitative + qualitative), real-world settings, participatory approaches, case studies, process evaluations, context analyses. The question is less “does the intervention work under ideal conditions” and more “how does it work in this setting and why (or why not)?”
Can implementation research include technology transfer, commercialisation or policy adoption?
Yes, these are part of the spectrum of application. Implementation can involve (for example) transferring results into industry, working with technology providers, adapting products, scaling up via policy or organizational systems.
What is the timeline expectation for implementation research outcomes?
Implementation often requires longer-term thinking - sustainability, scale-up and adaptation may require months or years. However, initial pilot phases or “early adoption” metrics can often be reported sooner.
How can I demonstrate the value of implementation research in my article?
You can include sections on: the setting/context, stakeholders, implementation strategy, barriers and enablers, outcomes of implementation (e.g., adoption, reach), cost/benefit, sustainability plan, lessons learnt. Including a real-world case and measures of uptake adds strong value.