A Flaw in Hubble Law

1
Salah A. Mabkhout
Salah A. Mabkhout
1 Thamar University

Send Message

To: Author

GJSFR Volume 23 Issue A2

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFR42L67

A Flaw in Hubble Law Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

There is an approximately linear relationship between redshift and distance at small scales for all the FLRW models, and departures from linearity at larger scales can be used to measure spatial curvature. Hubble’s law describes a uniformly expanding flat universe. Hubble’s law says: the furthest object recedes faster than the nearest one. Hubble’s law doesn`t explain why distant objects were receding fastest. We show this is not true. Unless there is a convincing reason confirms that the furthest object speeds faster than the nearest one, the two objects recede from the observer by the same velocity. The analogy of the surface of the balloon: that the furthest point recedes fastest is misleading, since the balloon is inflated from a preferred point, violates the isotropic principle. The problem relies on the similarity of the cosmological redshift to the Doppler redshift that both of them cause recession speed. This happened because the only cause of redshift that Hubble was aware was the common Doppler redshift. If cosmological redshift has nothing to do with the Doppler Effect, how do we know that galaxies that are very far away are also receding faster from us?

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Salah A. Mabkhout. 2026. \u201cA Flaw in Hubble Law\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 23 (GJSFR Volume 23 Issue A2): .

Download Citation

Hubble Law, cosmic expansion, astrophysics, space science, research study.
Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 23 Issue A2
Pg. 81- 91
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-A Classification: DDC Code: 720 LCC Code: NA2790GJSFR-A Classification:
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 12, 2023

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1122
Total Downloads: 18
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

There is an approximately linear relationship between redshift and distance at small scales for all the FLRW models, and departures from linearity at larger scales can be used to measure spatial curvature. Hubble’s law describes a uniformly expanding flat universe. Hubble’s law says: the furthest object recedes faster than the nearest one. Hubble’s law doesn`t explain why distant objects were receding fastest. We show this is not true. Unless there is a convincing reason confirms that the furthest object speeds faster than the nearest one, the two objects recede from the observer by the same velocity. The analogy of the surface of the balloon: that the furthest point recedes fastest is misleading, since the balloon is inflated from a preferred point, violates the isotropic principle. The problem relies on the similarity of the cosmological redshift to the Doppler redshift that both of them cause recession speed. This happened because the only cause of redshift that Hubble was aware was the common Doppler redshift. If cosmological redshift has nothing to do with the Doppler Effect, how do we know that galaxies that are very far away are also receding faster from us?

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

A Flaw in Hubble Law

Salah A. Mabkhout
Salah A. Mabkhout Thamar University

Research Journals