A Generic Curriculum Model for Computing Degree Programs

A Generic Curriculum Model for Computing Degree Programs

Dr. Muhammad Anwar-ur-Rehman Pasha

Contact

Dr. Shaheen Pasha

Contact

1 Imperial College of Business Studies, Lahore, Pakistan.

GJCST Volume 12 Issue B11

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTBYC33R

A Generic Curriculum Model for Computing Degree Programs Banner

The current literature shows the existing curriculum models are unable to meet the needs of the today’s dynamic & complex education as the society is more open, diverse, multidimensional, fluid and more problematical. A generic curriculum model is proposed for all types of computer degree programs. The proposed model defines five meta-processes, a flexible structure for hidden and formal curriculum, and innovative ideas for branding and capstone project. Taking a futuristic approach and keeping an eye on the emerging needs of today’s knowledge driven society, the proposed model aims to transform students into valuable plug-n-play knowledge workers equipped with up-to-date knowledge, marketable skills, valuable competencies, unique expertise, globally compatible dispositions and culturally and professionally acceptable values. Through introducing competencies, expertise and dispositions among threshold standards we have given a new starting point for curriculum experts to extend the virtual boundaries of teaching-learning environment from classrooms to work-place environments. The proposed model not only meets the existing needs of the core computing disciplines but also accommodate the implications of newly emerging disciplines. Its flexible structure allows both institutions and faculty to decorate it according to their requirements.

69 Cites in Articles

References

S Conte,John Hamblen,William Kehl,Silvio Navarro,Werner Rheinboldt,David Young,William Atchinson (1965). An undergraduate program in computer science—preliminary recommendations.
(2001). IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer Aided Design. ICCAD 2001. IEEE/ACM Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.01CH37281).
(2002). Model Curriculum and Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems.
(2004). Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Software Engineering.
(2004). Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Engineering.
(2005). Computing Curricula 2005: The Overview Report.
Eric Roberts,Russ Shackelford,Rich Leblanc,Peter Denning (2008). Curriculum 2001.
John Werth,John Gorgone,Gordon Davis,David Feinstein,Bart Longenecker,George Kasper (2010). Proposed joint ACM/DPMA/AIS undergraduate information systems degree curriculum model (abstract).
(2012). Computer Science Curricula 2013: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Computer Science.
M Bell,G Lefoe (1998). Curriculum design for flexible delivery -massaging the model.
J Biggs (1996). Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment.
J Biggs (2002). Aligning the Curriculum to Promote Good Learning, Constructive Alignment in Action, Imaginative Curriculum Symposium.
(1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals.
J Bruner,J Goodnow,A Austin (1956). A Study of Thinking.
J Bruner (1996). The Process of Education.
D Brunzel (2007). Universities sell their brands.
C Choo,N Bontis (2002). The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge.
E Cohen (2002). Challenges of Information Technology in the 21st Century.
Alonzo Church,A Turing (1936). A. M. Turing. On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungs problcm. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 2 s. vol. 42 (1936–1937), pp. 230–265..
S Cohen (1987). Instructional Alignment: Searching for a Magic Bullet.
T Davenport (2005). Thinking for Living.
M Davis (1958). Computability & unsolvability.
K H Dennis (2002). Quality Education through a Post-modern Curriculum.
Peter Denning (2001). The profession of IT: The IT schools movement.
W Doll (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum.
P Drucker (2006). Classic Drucker: essential wisdom of Peter Drucker from the pages of Harvard Business Review.
Elliot Eisner (1991). Invitational Conference on the Hidden Consequences of a National Curriculum.
D Fink (2003). Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses.
Kurt Gödel (1931). Über formal unentscheidbare Sätze der Principia Mathematica und verwandter Systeme I.
Dina Goldin,Peter Wegner (2008). The Interactive Nature of Computing: Refuting the Strong Church–Turing Thesis.
(2012). Higher Education Curriculum -National Reports on the Undergraduate Curriculum, Traditional and Contemporary Perspectives -Innovations in the Undergraduate Curriculum.
J Hopcroft,J Ullman (1969). Formal Languages and Their Relation yo Automata.
T Hussey,P Smith (2008). Learning Outcomes: A Conceptual Analysis.
Sonja Irlbeck,Elena Kays,Deborah Jones,Rod Sims (2006). The Phoenix Rising: Emergent models of instructional design.
H Jacobs (1997). Book Reviews : MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCES IN THE CLASSROOM Thomas Armstrong Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1994. Pp. xi, 185.
P Jackson (1968). Life in Classrooms.
Richard Karp (2011). Understanding Science Through the Computational Lens.
Peter Knight (2001). Complexity and Curriculum: a process approach to curriculum-making.
D Kerr,S Blenkinsop (2005). How to engage young people -the issues and challenges Disengagement, Disaffection or Engagement? National Foundation for Education Research for the British Council.
B Kogut,U Zander (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology.
J Kotkin (2000). The new geography: how the digital revolution is reshaping the American landscape.
G Li (2010). Information Science & Technology in China: A Roadmap to 2050.
D Li,H Zhang (2009). Cloud Computing Beyond Turing Machine.
B Lunt,J Ekstrom,S Gorka,R Kamali,E Lawson,J Miller,H Reichgelt (2005). Defining the IT curriculum: The results of the past 3 years.
Eric Margolis (2001). The Hidden Curriculum in Higher Education.
B Mccombs,J &whisler (1997). The learnercentered classroom and school.
J Mitchell,R Bluer (1997). A Planning Model for Innovation: New Learning Technologies.
Ikujiro Nonaka,Hirotaka Takeuchi (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company.
A Ornstein,F Hunkins (2009). Curriculum foundations, principles and issues.
G O'neill (2010). Initiating Curriculum Revision: Exploring the Practices of Educational Developers.
Jan Parker (2003). Reconceptualising the curriculum: from commodification to transformation.
J Rice,J Rice (1969). Introduction to Computer Science: Problems, Algorithms, Languages, Information and Computers.
P Samuelson (1999). Five Challenges for Regulating the Global Information Society.
B Seels,Z Glasgow (1990). Exercises in Instructional Design.
P Smith,T Ragan (2005). Foundations of Instructional Design.
H Taba (1962). Curriculum Development: Theory and Practice.
Martin Talbot (2004). Monkey see, monkey do: a critique of the competency model in graduate medical education.
Paul Temple (2006). Branding higher education: illusion or reality?.
J Toma,G Dubrow,M Hartley (2005). The Uses of Institutional Culture Strengthening Identification and Building Brand Equity in Higher Education.
Alistair Thomson (2007). Four Paradigm Transformations in Oral History.
D Tinkler,B Lepani,J Mitchell (1996). Education and Technology Convergence.
R Tyler (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction.
(2012). A Complex formula: girls and women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics in Asia.
A Utz (2006). Fostering Innovation for Productivity and Competitiveness.
Decker Walker (1971). A Naturalistic Model for Curriculum Development.
D Wheeler (1967). Curriculum Process.
G Wiggins,J Mctighe (2010). Understanding by Design: A brief introduction.
J Wing (2008). Computational Thinking and Thinking About Computing.
V Zítek,V Klímová (2011). Knowledge Economy and Knowledge Infrastructure.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Dr. Muhammad Anwar-ur-Rehman Pasha. 2012. \u201cA Generic Curriculum Model for Computing Degree Programs\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - B: Cloud & Distributed GJCST-B Volume 12 (GJCST Volume 12 Issue B11): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJCST Volume 12 Issue B11
Pg. 17- 24

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Computing Curriculum Computing Model Curriculum Dispositions in Computing Flexible C Global Education in Computing Hidden Curriculum in Computing

Classification

Not Found

Submission ReceivedApril 8, 2012
RevisedApril 8, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted May 3, 2012
Published May 15, 2012

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 26, 2012

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices

Total Score: 112

Country: Pakistan

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - B: Cloud & Distributed

Authors: Dr. Muhammad Anwar-ur-Rehman Pasha, Dr. Shaheen Pasha (PhD/Dr. count: 2)

View Count (all-time): 255

Total Views (Real + Logic): 10277

Total Downloads (simulated): 2750

Publish Date: 2012 09, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 57 views
Month 2: 54 views
Month 3: 47 views
Month 4: 34 views
Month 5: 34 views
Month 6: 18 views
Month 7: 47 views
Month 8: 46 views
Month 9: 47 views
Month 10: 35 views
Month 11: 19 views
Month 12: 31 views
Month 13: 42 views
Month 14: 23 views
Month 15: 49 views
Month 16: 20 views
Month 17: 31 views
Month 18: 45 views
Month 19: 30 views
Month 20: 27 views
Month 21: 34 views
Month 22: 37 views
Month 23: 42 views
Month 24: 33 views
Month 25: 38 views
Month 26: 24 views
Month 27: 28 views
Month 28: 42 views
Month 29: 30 views
Month 30: 32 views
Month 31: 23 views
Month 32: 41 views
Month 33: 27 views
Month 34: 45 views
Month 35: 29 views
Month 36: 18 views
Month 37: 43 views
Month 38: 43 views
Month 39: 25 views
Month 40: 33 views
Month 41: 36 views
Month 42: 39 views
Month 43: 25 views
Month 44: 28 views
Month 45: 32 views
Month 46: 32 views
Month 47: 20 views
Month 48: 35 views
Month 49: 41 views
Month 50: 37 views
Month 51: 13 views
Month 52: 22 views
Month 53: 33 views
Month 54: 30 views
Month 55: 32 views
Month 56: 30 views
Month 57: 24 views
Month 58: 18 views
Month 59: 26 views
Month 60: 24 views
Month 61: 25 views
Month 62: 29 views
Month 63: 42 views
Month 64: 25 views
Month 65: 35 views
Month 66: 29 views
Month 67: 24 views
Month 68: 22 views
Month 69: 46 views
Month 70: 32 views
Month 71: 37 views
Month 72: 29 views
Month 73: 16 views
Month 74: 18 views
Month 75: 22 views
Month 76: 31 views
Month 77: 18 views
Month 78: 35 views
Month 79: 23 views
Month 80: 21 views
Month 81: 36 views
Month 82: 43 views
Month 83: 35 views
Month 84: 41 views
Month 85: 28 views
Month 86: 35 views
Month 87: 29 views
Month 88: 20 views
Month 89: 28 views
Month 90: 24 views
Month 91: 36 views
Month 92: 44 views
Month 93: 42 views
Month 94: 26 views
Month 95: 28 views
Month 96: 16 views
Month 97: 37 views
Month 98: 31 views
Month 99: 31 views
Month 100: 32 views
Month 101: 47 views
Month 102: 33 views
Month 103: 32 views
Month 104: 26 views
Month 105: 17 views
Month 106: 25 views
Month 107: 35 views
Month 108: 18 views
Month 109: 28 views
Month 110: 18 views
Month 111: 32 views
Month 112: 20 views
Month 113: 27 views
Month 114: 12 views
Month 115: 42 views
Month 116: 20 views
Month 117: 16 views
Month 118: 41 views
Month 119: 40 views
Month 120: 37 views
Month 121: 33 views
Month 122: 43 views
Month 123: 32 views
Month 124: 29 views
Month 125: 25 views
Month 126: 47 views
Month 127: 48 views
Month 128: 32 views
Month 129: 10 views
Month 130: 13 views
Month 131: 24 views
Month 132: 17 views
Month 133: 36 views
Month 134: 27 views
Month 135: 42 views
Month 136: 21 views
Month 137: 42 views
Month 138: 23 views
Month 139: 33 views
Month 140: 12 views
Month 141: 40 views
Month 142: 30 views
Month 143: 36 views
Month 144: 36 views
Month 145: 37 views
Month 146: 25 views
Month 147: 31 views
Month 148: 42 views
Month 149: 37 views
Month 150: 33 views
Month 151: 26 views
Month 152: 39 views
Month 153: 30 views
Month 154: 31 views
Month 155: 43 views
Month 156: 35 views
Month 157: 18 views
Month 158: 50 views
Month 159: 51 views
Month 160: 24 views
Month 161: 35 views
Month 162: 82 views
Month 163: 39 views

Total Views: 10277

Total Downloads: 2750

2026 Trends

Research Identity (RIN)

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.