1. M Artigue (2000). Instrumentation issues and the integration of computer technologies into secondary mathematics teaching. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the GDM
2. A Baroody,Y Feil,A Johnson (2007). Research commentary: An alternative reconceptualization of procedural and conceptual knowledge. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(2), 115-131.
3. N Balacheff (1988). Aspects of proof in pupils' practice of school mathematics. Mathematics, Teachers and Children, 216-238.
4. M Battista (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 843-908.
5. M Battista (2008). Representations and cognitive objects in modern school geometry. Research on Technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics, 2
6. John Biggs,Kevin Collis (1982). Origin and Description of the SOLO Taxonomy. Evaluating the Quality of Learning, 17-31.
7. J Biggs,K Collis (1991). Multimodal learning and the quality of intelligent behaviour. Intelligence, Reconceptualization and Measurement
8. Janet Bowers,Becky Stephens (2011). Using technology to explore mathematical relationships: a framework for orienting mathematics courses for prospective teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14(4), 285-304.
9. J Bruner (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Toward a theory of instruction
10. D Campbell,J Stanley (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. Handbook of Research on Teaching
11. L Cannizzaro,M Menghini (2003). Geometric Figures from Middle to Secondary School: Mediating Theory and Practice. CERME, 3
12. Victor Cifarelli (1998). The development of mental representations as a problem solving activity. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 239-264.
13. Bronislaw Czarnocha,Ed Dubinsky,Sergio Loch,Vrunda Prabhu,Draga Vidakovic (1999). Conceptions of Area: In Students and in History. The College Mathematics Journal, 32(2), 99-109.
14. Sang Choi-Koh,Sook (1999). A Student's Learning of Geometry Using the Computer. The Journal of Educational Research, 92(5), 301-311.
15. Douglas Clements,Julie Sarama (2004). Learning Trajectories in Mathematics Education. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 6(2), 81-89.
16. (2001). Logo and geometry. Logo and geometry
17. P Cobb,H Bauersfeld (1995). The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning. The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures, 1-16.
18. (1995). Mathematical Learning and Small-Group Interaction: Four Case Studies: Paul Cobb. The Emergence of Mathematical Meaning, 35-139.
19. Paul Cobb,Erna Yackel,Terry Wood (1989). Young Children’s Emotional Acts While Engaged in Mathematical Problem Solving. Affect and Mathematical Problem Solving, 20, 117-148.
20. P Cobb,E Yackel,T Wood (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind in mathematics education. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 2-33.
21. M De Villiers (1994). The role and function of a hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 11-18.
22. Michael De Villiers (2004). Using dynamic geometry to expand mathematics teachers’ understanding of proof. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 35(5), 703-724.
23. Rijkje Dekker,Marianne Elshout-Mohr (2004). Teacher Interventions Aimed at Mathematical Level Raising During Collaborative Learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 39-65.
24. P Drijvers,L Trouche (2008). From artifacts to instruments: A theoretical framework behind the orchestra metaphor. Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics, 2
25. Raymond Duval (2006). A Cognitive Analysis of Problems of Comprehension in a Learning of Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 61(1-2), 103-131.
26. James Fey (1989). Technology and mathematics education: A survey of recent developments and important problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(3), 237-272.
27. Freudenthal (1991). Revisiting Mathematics Education: China Lectures. Revisiting Mathematics Education: China Lectures
28. H Freudenthal (1973). Mathematics as an Educational Task. Mathematics as an Educational Task
29. T Fujita,K Jones (2007). Learners' Understanding of the Definitions and Hierarchical Classification of Quadrilaterals: towards a theoretical framing. Research in Mathematics Education, 9(1&2), 3-20.
30. F Furinghetti,D Paola (2003). Revisiting guided reinvention: icons, indexes, and symbols in the construction of mathematical objects. Revisiting guided reinvention: icons, indexes, and symbols in the construction of mathematical objects
31. Van Hiele (1984). English translation of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. Brooklyn: Brooklyn College
32. Merrilyn Goos,Peter Galbraith,Peter Renshaw (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), 193-223.
33. Gerald Goldin,Claude Janvier (1998). Representations and the psychology of mathematics education. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(1), 1-4.
34. G Goldin,N Shteingold (2001). NATIONAL COUNCIL OF TEACHERS OF MATHEMATICS. School Science and Mathematics, 71(6), 580-580.
35. Günter Graumann (2005). Investigating and ordering Quadrilaterals and their analogies in space—problem fields with various aspects. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 37(3), 190-198.
36. K Gravemeijer,J Terwel (2000). Hans Freudenthal: A mathematician on didactics and curriculum theory. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(6), 777-796.
37. G Harel (2008). DNR Perspective on Mathematics Curriculum and Instruction: Focus on Proving, Part I. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 40, 487-500.
38. Guershon Harel,Larry Sowder (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 234-283.
39. (1998). Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education. III. Research in collegiate mathematics education III, 234-283.
40. J Hasegawa (1997). Concept formation of triangles and quadrilaterals in the second grade. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32, 157-179.
41. R Hershkovitz (1990). Mathematics and Cognition.
42. N Jackiw (1991). The Geometer's Sketchpad. The Geometer's Sketchpad
43. Ana Jahn (2002). “Locus” and “Trace” in Cabrigéomètre: relationships between geometric and functional aspects in a study of transformations. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 34(3), 78-84.
44. C Janvier (1987). Problems of Representations in the Learning and Teaching of Mathematics. Problems of Representations in the Learning and Teaching of Mathematics
45. Barbara Jaworski (2003). Mathematics Teacher Research: Process, Practice and the Development of Teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1(1), 3-31.
46. Dj. Kadijevich,L Haapasalo (2001). Linking procedural and conceptual mathematical knowledge through CAL. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(2), 156-165.
47. James Kaput (1999). Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: A kaleidoscope of windows. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 265-281.
48. Stephen Kemmis,Robin Mctaggart,Rhonda Nixon (1982). The Action Research Planner. The action research planner
49. G Krummheuer (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. The emergence of mathematical meaning: Interaction in classroom cultures, 229-269.
50. C Laborde (2003). Technology used as a tool for mediating knowledge in the teaching of mathematics: the case of Cabri-geometry. Plenary speech delivered at the Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics
51. Chung Hau University,Taiwan Unknown Title.
52. C Laborde (2005). Robust and soft constructions: two sides of the use of dynamic geometry environments. Proceedings of the 10th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics, 22-35.
53. F Lopez-Real,A Leung (2004). The conceptual tools of Euclidean and dynamic geometry environments. Topic Study Group 10: Research and development in the teaching and learning of geometry
54. S Patsiomitou,A Barkatsas,A Emvalotis (2010). Journal of Mathematics and Technology. Journal of Mathematics and Technology (JMT), 43-56.
55. John Pegg (2003). Assessment in Mathematics. Mathematical Cognition, 227-259.
56. B Pedemonte (2007). How can the relationship between argumentation and proof be analysed. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 23-41.
57. J Pegg,D Tall (2005). The fundamental cycle of concept construction underlying various theoretical frameworks. International Reviews on Mathematical Education (Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik), 37(6), 468-475.
58. J Piaget,R Garcia (1983). Psychogenèse et Histoire des Sciences. Psychogenèse et Histoire des Sciences, 80
59. C Peirce (1992). Deduction, Induction, and Hypothesis (1878). The Essential Peirce, Volume 1, 1, 186-199.
60. Jean Piaget (1937). The construction of reality in the child. The construction of reality in the child
61. P Rabardel (1995). Les hommes et les technologies, approche cognitive des instruments contemporains. Les hommes et les technologies, approche cognitive des instruments contemporains
62. D Schön (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Educating the reflective practitioner
63. B Schwartz,R Herschkowitz,T Dreyfus (2001). Emerging knowledge structures in and with algebra. European Research in Mathematics Education II, Proceedings of the CERME2, 269-280.
64. Kamran Sedig,Mark Sumner (2006). Characterizing Interaction with Visual Mathematical Representations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(1), 1-55.
65. A Sfard (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 1-36.
66. Martin Simon (1995). Reconstructing Mathematics Pedagogy from a Constructivist Perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 114-145.
67. M Simon (1996). ‗Beyond inductive and deductive reasoning: the search for a sense of knowing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 197-210.
68. A Sfard (2001). Learning mathematics as developing a discourse. Proceedings of 21st Conference of PME-NA, 23-44.
69. R Skemp (1986). The psychology of learning mathematics. The psychology of learning mathematics
70. J Son (2006). Investigating preservice teachers' understanding and strategies on a students' errors of reflective symmetry.
71. C Steketee (2004). Action research as an investigative approach within a computer base community of learners. Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference, 875-880.
72. Leslie Steffe,John Olive (1996). Symbolizing as a Constructive Activity in a Computer Microworld. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(2), 113-138.
73. A Strauss,J Corbin (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques
74. Anne Teppo (1991). Van Hiele Levels of Geometric Thought Revisited. The Mathematics Teacher, 84(3), 210-221.
75. S Toulmin (1958). The uses of argument. The uses of argument
76. Luc Trouche (2004). Managing the Complexity of Human/Machine Interactions in Computerized Learning Environments: Guiding Students’ Command Process through Instrumental Orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 281-307.
77. Z Usiskin (1982). Van Hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry. Cognitive Development and Achievement in Secondary School Geometry Project), 220, 288.
78. J Van Dormolen (1977). Learning to understand what giving a proof really means. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 8(1), 27-34.
79. P Van Hiele (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education, 101.
80. P Verillon,P Rabardel (1995). Cognition and Artifacts: a contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 102.
81. G Vergnaud (1998). Comprehensive theory of representation for mathematics education. Journal of Mathematics Behavior, 17(2), 103.
82. Paul White,Michael Mitchelmore (2010). Teaching for Abstraction: A Model. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(3), 205-226.
83. Moshé Whiteley (2005). Making Sense of Transformations and Symmetry -the Heart of Geometry. Making Sense of Transformations and Symmetry -the Heart of Geometry
84. J Watson,J Moritz (2001). The role of cognitive conflict in developing student's understanding of chance measurement. Numeracy and beyond (Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conferenc of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 2, 106.
85. E Yackel,C Rasmussen (2002). Beliefs and norms in the mathematics classroom. Beliefs: A hidden variable in mathematics education?, 313-330.
86. E Yackel,P Cobb (1994). Classroom Microcultures and Reform in Mathematics Education‖. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 108.
87. E Yackel,P Cobb,T Wood,G Wheatley,G Merkel (1990). The importance of social interactions in childrens construction of mathematical knowledge. Teaching and learning mathematics in the 1990s, 109.
88. Erna Yackel,Chris Rasmussen,Karen King (2001). Social and sociomathematical norms in an advanced undergraduate mathematics course. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19(3), 275-287.
