A Look at the Uncertainty of Measuring The Fundamental Constants and the Maxwell Demon from the Perspective of the Information Approach

α
Boris Menin
Boris Menin

Send Message

To: Author

A Look at the Uncertainty of Measuring The Fundamental Constants and the Maxwell Demon from the Perspective of the Information Approach

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

9Q1H6

A Look at the Uncertainty of Measuring The Fundamental Constants and the Maxwell Demon from the Perspective of the Information Approach Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

This paper proposes a new framework for calculating the discrepancy of a model and the observed technological process or physical phenomenon. It offers powerful tools for all measurement methods applied in technology, engineering and experimental physics. Since the studies that validate and verificate the models of the phenomenon are still complex, they need to be combined into one total measure. Existing methods used in almost all literature up to the present time implicitly suggest that the use of supercomputers and the latest mathematical statistical methods allows achieving high accuracy very close to the boundaries of Heisenberg principle. To compare methodologies for improving models, we propose a new metric called comparative uncertainty. This allows us to prove that there is a limit to the achievable discrepancy between the model and the object under study.

References

56 Cites in Article
  1. Max Henrion,Baruch Fischhoff (1986). Assessing uncertainty in physical constants.
  2. M Kušnerová,J Valíček,M Harničárová,T Hryniewicz,K Rokosz,Z Palková,V Václavík,M Řepka,M Bendová (2013). A Proposal for Simplifying the Method of Evaluation of Uncertainties in Measurement Results.
  3. L Finkelstein (1975). REPRESENTATION BY SYMBOL SYSTEMS AS AN EXTENSION OF THE CONCEPT OF MEASUREMENT.
  4. R Hartley (1928). Transmission of Information<sup>1</sup>.
  5. B Van Fraassen (2008). Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective.
  6. L Mari (1999). Notes towards a qualitative analysis of information in measurement results.
  7. Boris Menin (2017). Simplest Method for Calculating the Lowest Achievable Uncertainty of Model at Measurements of Fundamental Physical Constants.
  8. Boris Menin (2017). Preferred physical-mathematical model of the cold energy storage system.
  9. B Menin (2016). Accuracy of Predictions of Ice Slurry Properties and Technical Characteristics of Machines Producing It.
  10. Boris Menin (2015). Accuracy limits of modelling predictions of multivariable heat and mass transfer processes.
  11. A Sonin (2001). The physical basis of dimensional analysis.
  12. Barry Taylor,Barry Taylor (2008). The international system of units (SI).
  13. A Jakulin,Qgbvou (2004). Symmetry and information theory.
  14. L Sedov (1993). Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics.
  15. Leon Brillouin (1964). INTRODUCTION.
  16. A Levina,I Babachenko,N Skripchenko,T Chebotareva,O Demina (2005). Therapy of chronic herpesvirus infection in frequently ill children. Possible causes of inefficiency.
  17. G Hinshaw (2009). Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Data Processing, Sky Maps, and Basic Results.
  18. Adam Riess,Lucas Macri,Stefano Casertano,Hubert Lampeitl,Henry Ferguson,Alexei Filippenko,Saurabh Jha,Weidong Li,Ryan Chornock (2011). A 3% SOLUTION: DETERMINATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT WITH THE<i>HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE</i>AND WIDE FIELD CAMERA 3.
  19. N Jarosik,C Bennett,J Dunkley,B Gold,M Greason,M Halpern,R Hill,G Hinshaw,A Kogut,E Komatsu,D Larson,M Limon,S Meyer,M Nolta,N Odegard,L Page,K Smith,D Spergel,G Tucker,J Weiland,E Wollack,E Wright (2011). SEVEN-YEAR <i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE</i> ( <i>WMAP</i> ) OBSERVATIONS: SKY MAPS, SYSTEMATIC ERRORS, AND BASIC RESULTS.
  20. C Bennett,D Larson,J Weiland,N Jarosik,G Hinshaw,N Odegard,K Smith,R Hill,B Gold,M Halpern,E Komatsu,M Nolta,L Page,D Spergel,E Wollack,J Dunkley,A Kogut,M Limon,S Meyer,G Tucker,E Wright (2012). NINE-YEAR <i>WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE</i> ( <i>WMAP</i> ) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS.
  21. G Efstathiou (2014). H0 revisited.
  22. C Bennett,D Larson,J Weiland,G Hinshaw (2014). The 1% concordance Hubble constant.
  23. Cheng Cheng,Qingguo Huang (2015). An accurate determination of the Hubble constant from baryon acoustic oscillation datasets.
  24. P Ade,N Aghanim,M Arnaud,M Ashdown,J Aumont,C Baccigalupi,A Banday,R Barreiro,J Bartlett,N Bartolo,E Battaner,R Battye,K Benabed,A Benoît,A Benoit-Lévy,J-P Bernard,M Bersanelli,P Bielewicz,J Bock,A Bonaldi,L Bonavera,J Bond,J Borrill,F Bouchet,F Boulanger,M Bucher,C Burigana,R Butler,E Calabrese,J-F Cardoso,A Catalano,A Challinor,A Chamballu,R-R Chary,H Chiang,J Chluba,P Christensen,S Church,D Clements,S Colombi,L Colombo,C Combet,A Coulais,B Crill,A Curto,F Cuttaia,L Danese,R Davies,R Davis,P De Bernardis,A De Rosa,G De Zotti,J Delabrouille,F-X Désert,E Di Valentino,C Dickinson,J Diego,K Dolag,H Dole,S Donzelli,O Doré,M Douspis,A Ducout,J Dunkley,X Dupac,G Efstathiou,F Elsner,T Enßlin,H Eriksen,M Farhang,J Fergusson,F Finelli,O Forni,M Frailis,A Fraisse,E Franceschi,A Frejsel,S Galeotta,S Galli,K Ganga,C Gauthier,M Gerbino,T Ghosh,M Giard,Y Giraud-Héraud,E Giusarma,E Gjerløw,J González-Nuevo,K Górski,S Gratton,A Gregorio,A Gruppuso,J Gudmundsson,J Hamann,F Hansen,D Hanson,D Harrison,G Helou,S Henrot-Versillé,C Hernández-Monteagudo,D Herranz,S Hildebrandt,E Hivon,M Hobson,W Holmes,A Hornstrup,W Hovest,Z Huang,K Huffenberger,G Hurier,A Jaffe,T Jaffe,W Jones,M Juvela,E Keihänen,R Keskitalo,T Kisner,R Kneissl,J Knoche,L Knox,M Kunz,H Kurki-Suonio,G Lagache,A Lähteenmäki,J-M Lamarre,A Lasenby,M Lattanzi,C Lawrence,J Leahy,R Leonardi,J Lesgourgues,F Levrier,A Lewis,M Liguori,P Lilje,M Linden-Vørnle,M López-Caniego,P Lubin,J Macías-Pérez,G Maggio,D Maino,N Mandolesi,A Mangilli,A Marchini,M Maris,P Martin,M Martinelli,E Martínez-González,S Masi,S Matarrese,P Mcgehee,P Meinhold,A Melchiorri,J-B Melin,L Mendes,A Mennella,M Migliaccio,M Millea,S Mitra,M-A Miville-Deschênes,A Moneti,L Montier,G Morgante,D Mortlock,A Moss,D Munshi,J Murphy,P Naselsky,F Nati,P Natoli,C Netterfield,H Nørgaard-Nielsen,F Noviello,D Novikov,I Novikov,C Oxborrow,F Paci,L Pagano,F Pajot,R Paladini,D Paoletti,B Partridge,F Pasian,G Patanchon,T Pearson,O Perdereau,L Perotto,F Perrotta,V Pettorino,F Piacentini,M Piat,E Pierpaoli,D Pietrobon,S Plaszczynski,E Pointecouteau,G Polenta,L Popa,G Pratt,G Prézeau,S Prunet,J-L Puget,J Rachen,W Reach,R Rebolo,M Reinecke,M Remazeilles,C Renault,A Renzi,I Ristorcelli,G Rocha,C Rosset,M Rossetti,G Roudier,B Rouillé D’orfeuil,M Rowan-Robinson,J Rubiño-Martín,B Rusholme,N Said,V Salvatelli,L Salvati,M Sandri,D Santos,M Savelainen,G Savini,D Scott,M Seiffert,P Serra,E Shellard,L Spencer,M Spinelli,V Stolyarov,R Stompor,R Sudiwala,R Sunyaev,D Sutton,A-S Suur-Uski,J-F Sygnet,J Tauber,L Terenzi,L Toffolatti,M Tomasi,M Tristram,T Trombetti,M Tucci,J Tuovinen,M Türler,G Umana,L Valenziano,J Valiviita,F Van Tent,P Vielva,F Villa,L Wade,B Wandelt,I Wehus,M White,S White,A Wilkinson,D Yvon,A Zacchei,A Zonca (2015). <i>Planck</i>2015 results.
  25. Hai Yu,Bharat Ratra,Fa-Yin Wang (2018). Hubble Parameter and Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurement Constraints on the Hubble Constant, the Deviation from the Spatially Flat ΛCDM Model, the Deceleration–Acceleration Transition Redshift, and Spatial Curvature.
  26. B Benson (2018). The Hubble Constant from the Cosmic Microwave Background.
  27. Boris Menin (2018). Simplest Method for Calculating the Lowest Achievable Uncertainty of Model at Measurements of Fundamental Physical Constants.
  28. D Newell (2017). The CODATA 2017 Values of h, e, k, and NA.
  29. B Wood,C Sanchez,R Green,J Liard (2017). A summary of the Planck constant determinations using the NRC Kibble balance.
  30. Y Azuma,P Barat,G Bartl,H Bettin,M Borys,I Busch,L Cibik,G D’agostino,K Fujii,H Fujimoto,A Hioki,M Krumrey,U Kuetgens,N Kuramoto,G Mana,E Massa,R Meeß,S Mizushima,T Narukawa,A Nicolaus,A Pramann,S Rabb,O Rienitz,C Sasso,M Stock,R Vocke,A Waseda,S Wundrack,S Zakel (2015). Improved measurement results for the Avogadro constant using a<sup>28</sup>Si-enriched crystal.
  31. G Kirakosyan (2010). Induced Circularly Polarized Luminescence and Exciton Fine Structure Splitting in Magnetic-Doped Chiral Perovskites.
  32. Peter Mohr,David Newell,Barry Taylor (2016). CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2014.
  33. T Oliver,G Terejanu,C Simmons,R Moser (2015). Validating predictions of unobserved quantities.
  34. L Szilárd (1929). On the decrease of entropy in a thermodynamic system by the intervention of intelligent beings.
  35. Charles Bennett (1982). The thermodynamics of computation—a review.
  36. Takahiro Sagawa,Masahito Ueda (2009). Minimal Energy Cost for Thermodynamic Information Processing: Measurement and Information Erasure.
  37. H Leff,A Rex (2003). Maxwell's Demon 2 Entropy, Classical and Quantum Information, Computing.
  38. Koji Maruyama,Franco Nori,Vlatko Vedral (2009). <i>Colloquium</i>: The physics of Maxwell’s demon and information.
  39. R Landauer (1961). Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process.
  40. Shoichi Toyabe,Takahiro Sagawa,Masahito Ueda,Eiro Muneyuki,Masaki Sano (2010). Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality.
  41. Jonne Koski,Ville Maisi,Jukka Pekola,Dmitri Averin (2014). Experimental realization of a Szilard engine with a single electron.
  42. B Menin (2015). Possible limits of accuracy in measurement of fundamental physical constants.
  43. M Volkenstein (2009). Designer Profile 2008/2009: Graphic + Multimedia Design.
  44. S.-L Liu (2017). Electromagnetic fields, size, and copy of a single photon.
  45. Boris Menin (2018). Bekenstein-Bound and Information-Based Approach.
  46. J Schement,B Ruben (1993). Information Theory and Communication.
  47. Jacob Bekenstein (1981). Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems.
  48. Max Pettini,Ryan Cooke (2015). Precision cosmology with the lightest elements.
  49. Jie Wang (2011). WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe): Revealing Our Universe in Its Infancy.
  50. P Davies (2007). The Implications of a Cosmological Information Bound for Complexity, Quantum Information and the Nature of Physical Law.
  51. W Zurek (1989). Algorithmic randomness and physical entropy.
  52. Seth Lloyd (2002). Computational Capacity of the Universe.
  53. A Mukhopadhyay (2008). A Theory of Wonder: Evolution, Brain and the Radical Nature of Science [PDF, E-Book].
  54. Ioannis Haranas,Ioannis Gkigkitzis (2014). BEKENSTEIN BOUND OF INFORMATION NUMBER N AND ITS RELATION TO COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN A UNIVERSE WITH AND WITHOUT COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT.
  55. T Padmanabhan,Hamsa Padmanabhan (2017). Cosmic information, the cosmological constant and the amplitude of primordial perturbations.
  56. Mark Burgin (2003). Information Theory: a Multifaceted Model of Information.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Boris Menin. 2019. \u201cA Look at the Uncertainty of Measuring The Fundamental Constants and the Maxwell Demon from the Perspective of the Information Approach\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics GJRE-A Volume 19 (GJRE Volume 19 Issue A1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords
Classification
GJRE-A Classification: FOR Code: 091399
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 17, 2019

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2922
Total Downloads: 1436
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

This paper proposes a new framework for calculating the discrepancy of a model and the observed technological process or physical phenomenon. It offers powerful tools for all measurement methods applied in technology, engineering and experimental physics. Since the studies that validate and verificate the models of the phenomenon are still complex, they need to be combined into one total measure. Existing methods used in almost all literature up to the present time implicitly suggest that the use of supercomputers and the latest mathematical statistical methods allows achieving high accuracy very close to the boundaries of Heisenberg principle. To compare methodologies for improving models, we propose a new metric called comparative uncertainty. This allows us to prove that there is a limit to the achievable discrepancy between the model and the object under study.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

A Look at the Uncertainty of Measuring The Fundamental Constants and the Maxwell Demon from the Perspective of the Information Approach

Boris Menin
Boris Menin

Research Journals