A Look at the Uncertainty of Measuring The Fundamental Constants and the Maxwell Demon from the Perspective of the Information Approach

Boris Menin

A Look at the Uncertainty of Measuring The Fundamental Constants and the Maxwell Demon from the Perspective of the Information Approach

Boris Menin *

Contact

A Look at the Uncertainty of Measuring The Fundamental Constants and the Maxwell Demon from the Perspective of the Information Approach

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

9Q1H6

A Look at the Uncertainty of Measuring The Fundamental Constants and the Maxwell Demon from the Perspective of the Information Approach Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

This paper proposes a new framework for calculating the discrepancy of a model and the observed technological process or physical phenomenon. It offers powerful tools for all measurement methods applied in technology, engineering and experimental physics. Since the studies that validate and verificate the models of the phenomenon are still complex, they need to be combined into one total measure. Existing methods used in almost all literature up to the present time implicitly suggest that the use of supercomputers and the latest mathematical statistical methods allows achieving high accuracy very close to the boundaries of Heisenberg principle. To compare methodologies for improving models, we propose a new metric called comparative uncertainty. This allows us to prove that there is a limit to the achievable discrepancy between the model and the object under study.

References

56 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. Max Henrion,Baruch Fischhoff (1986). Assessing uncertainty in physical constants. American Journal of Physics, 54(9), 791-798.
2. M Kušnerová,J Valíček,M Harničárová,T Hryniewicz,K Rokosz,Z Palková,V Václavík,M Řepka,M Bendová (2013). A Proposal for Simplifying the Method of Evaluation of Uncertainties in Measurement Results. Measurement Science Review, 13(1), 1-6.
3. L Finkelstein (1975). REPRESENTATION BY SYMBOL SYSTEMS AS AN EXTENSION OF THE CONCEPT OF MEASUREMENT. Kybernetes, 4(4), 215-223.
4. R Hartley (1928). Transmission of Information¹. Bell System Technical Journal, 7(3), 535-563.
5. B Van Fraassen (2008). Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective, 141-185.
6. L Mari (1999). Notes towards a qualitative analysis of information in measurement results. Measurement, 25(3), 183-192.
7. Boris Menin (2017). Simplest Method for Calculating the Lowest Achievable Uncertainty of Model at Measurements of Fundamental Physical Constants. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 05(11), 2162-2171.
8. Boris Menin (2017). Preferred physical-mathematical model of the cold energy storage system. Applied Thermal Engineering, 112, 1020-1026.
9. B Menin (2016). Accuracy of Predictions of Ice Slurry Properties and Technical Characteristics of Machines Producing It. American Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 6(2), 74-81.
10. Boris Menin (2015). Accuracy limits of modelling predictions of multivariable heat and mass transfer processes. International Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Optimisation, 6(4), 321.
11. A Sonin (2001). The physical basis of dimensional analysis. The physical basis of dimensional analysis
12. Barry Taylor,Barry Taylor (2008). The international system of units (SI). The International System of Units (SI), 330
13. A Jakulin,Qgbvou (2004). Symmetry and information theory. Symmetry and information theory, 1-20.
14. L Sedov (1993). Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics. Similarity and Dimensional Methods in Mechanics
15. Leon Brillouin (1964). INTRODUCTION. Scientific Uncertainty and Information, vii-x.
16. A Levina,I Babachenko,N Skripchenko,T Chebotareva,O Demina (2005). Therapy of chronic herpesvirus infection in frequently ill children. Possible causes of inefficiency. Russian Journal of Woman and Child Health, 5(4), 332-339.
17. G Hinshaw (2009). Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Data Processing, Sky Maps, and Basic Results. the Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 180, 225-245.
18. Adam Riess,Lucas Macri,Stefano Casertano,Hubert Lampeitl,Henry Ferguson,Alexei Filippenko,Saurabh Jha,Weidong Li,Ryan Chornock (2011). A 3% SOLUTION: DETERMINATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT WITH THEHUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPEAND WIDE FIELD CAMERA 3. The Astrophysical Journal, 730(2), 119.
19. N Jarosik,C Bennett,J Dunkley,B Gold,M Greason,M Halpern,R Hill,G Hinshaw,A Kogut,E Komatsu,D Larson,M Limon,S Meyer,M Nolta,N Odegard,L Page,K Smith,D Spergel,G Tucker,J Weiland,E Wollack,E Wright (2011). SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: SKY MAPS, SYSTEMATIC ERRORS, AND BASIC RESULTS. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 192(2), 14.
20. C Bennett,D Larson,J Weiland,N Jarosik,G Hinshaw,N Odegard,K Smith,R Hill,B Gold,M Halpern,E Komatsu,M Nolta,L Page,D Spergel,E Wollack,J Dunkley,A Kogut,M Limon,S Meyer,G Tucker,E Wright (2012). NINE-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE ( WMAP ) OBSERVATIONS: FINAL MAPS AND RESULTS. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 208(2), 20.
21. G Efstathiou (2014). H0 revisited. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 440(2), 1138-1152.
22. C Bennett,D Larson,J Weiland,G Hinshaw (2014). The 1% concordance Hubble constant. The Astrophysical Journal, 794(135), 1-8.
23. Cheng Cheng,Qingguo Huang (2015). An accurate determination of the Hubble constant from baryon acoustic oscillation datasets. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 58(9), 1-6.
24. P Ade,N Aghanim,M Arnaud,M Ashdown,J Aumont,C Baccigalupi,A Banday,R Barreiro,J Bartlett,N Bartolo,E Battaner,R Battye,K Benabed,A Benoît,A Benoit-Lévy,J-P Bernard,M Bersanelli,P Bielewicz,J Bock,A Bonaldi,L Bonavera,J Bond,J Borrill,F Bouchet,F Boulanger,M Bucher,C Burigana,R Butler,E Calabrese,J-F Cardoso,A Catalano,A Challinor,A Chamballu,R-R Chary,H Chiang,J Chluba,P Christensen,S Church,D Clements,S Colombi,L Colombo,C Combet,A Coulais,B Crill,A Curto,F Cuttaia,L Danese,R Davies,R Davis,P De Bernardis,A De Rosa,G De Zotti,J Delabrouille,F-X Désert,E Di Valentino,C Dickinson,J Diego,K Dolag,H Dole,S Donzelli,O Doré,M Douspis,A Ducout,J Dunkley,X Dupac,G Efstathiou,F Elsner,T Enßlin,H Eriksen,M Farhang,J Fergusson,F Finelli,O Forni,M Frailis,A Fraisse,E Franceschi,A Frejsel,S Galeotta,S Galli,K Ganga,C Gauthier,M Gerbino,T Ghosh,M Giard,Y Giraud-Héraud,E Giusarma,E Gjerløw,J González-Nuevo,K Górski,S Gratton,A Gregorio,A Gruppuso,J Gudmundsson,J Hamann,F Hansen,D Hanson,D Harrison,G Helou,S Henrot-Versillé,C Hernández-Monteagudo,D Herranz,S Hildebrandt,E Hivon,M Hobson,W Holmes,A Hornstrup,W Hovest,Z Huang,K Huffenberger,G Hurier,A Jaffe,T Jaffe,W Jones,M Juvela,E Keihänen,R Keskitalo,T Kisner,R Kneissl,J Knoche,L Knox,M Kunz,H Kurki-Suonio,G Lagache,A Lähteenmäki,J-M Lamarre,A Lasenby,M Lattanzi,C Lawrence,J Leahy,R Leonardi,J Lesgourgues,F Levrier,A Lewis,M Liguori,P Lilje,M Linden-Vørnle,M López-Caniego,P Lubin,J Macías-Pérez,G Maggio,D Maino,N Mandolesi,A Mangilli,A Marchini,M Maris,P Martin,M Martinelli,E Martínez-González,S Masi,S Matarrese,P Mcgehee,P Meinhold,A Melchiorri,J-B Melin,L Mendes,A Mennella,M Migliaccio,M Millea,S Mitra,M-A Miville-Deschênes,A Moneti,L Montier,G Morgante,D Mortlock,A Moss,D Munshi,J Murphy,P Naselsky,F Nati,P Natoli,C Netterfield,H Nørgaard-Nielsen,F Noviello,D Novikov,I Novikov,C Oxborrow,F Paci,L Pagano,F Pajot,R Paladini,D Paoletti,B Partridge,F Pasian,G Patanchon,T Pearson,O Perdereau,L Perotto,F Perrotta,V Pettorino,F Piacentini,M Piat,E Pierpaoli,D Pietrobon,S Plaszczynski,E Pointecouteau,G Polenta,L Popa,G Pratt,G Prézeau,S Prunet,J-L Puget,J Rachen,W Reach,R Rebolo,M Reinecke,M Remazeilles,C Renault,A Renzi,I Ristorcelli,G Rocha,C Rosset,M Rossetti,G Roudier,B Rouillé D’orfeuil,M Rowan-Robinson,J Rubiño-Martín,B Rusholme,N Said,V Salvatelli,L Salvati,M Sandri,D Santos,M Savelainen,G Savini,D Scott,M Seiffert,P Serra,E Shellard,L Spencer,M Spinelli,V Stolyarov,R Stompor,R Sudiwala,R Sunyaev,D Sutton,A-S Suur-Uski,J-F Sygnet,J Tauber,L Terenzi,L Toffolatti,M Tomasi,M Tristram,T Trombetti,M Tucci,J Tuovinen,M Türler,G Umana,L Valenziano,J Valiviita,F Van Tent,P Vielva,F Villa,L Wade,B Wandelt,I Wehus,M White,S White,A Wilkinson,D Yvon,A Zacchei,A Zonca (2015). Planck2015 results. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594(13), A13.
25. Hai Yu,Bharat Ratra,Fa-Yin Wang (2018). Hubble Parameter and Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurement Constraints on the Hubble Constant, the Deviation from the Spatially Flat ΛCDM Model, the Deceleration–Acceleration Transition Redshift, and Spatial Curvature. The Astrophysical Journal, 856(1), 3.
26. B Benson (2018). The Hubble Constant from the Cosmic Microwave Background. American Physical Society Meeting
27. Boris Menin (2018). Simplest Method for Calculating the Lowest Achievable Uncertainty of Model at Measurements of Fundamental Physical Constants. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 05(11), 2162-2171.
28. D Newell (2017). The CODATA 2017 Values of h, e, k, and NA. Metrologia, 54, 1-6.
29. B Wood,C Sanchez,R Green,J Liard (2017). A summary of the Planck constant determinations using the NRC Kibble balance. Metrologia, 54(3), 399-409.
30. Y Azuma,P Barat,G Bartl,H Bettin,M Borys,I Busch,L Cibik,G D’agostino,K Fujii,H Fujimoto,A Hioki,M Krumrey,U Kuetgens,N Kuramoto,G Mana,E Massa,R Meeß,S Mizushima,T Narukawa,A Nicolaus,A Pramann,S Rabb,O Rienitz,C Sasso,M Stock,R Vocke,A Waseda,S Wundrack,S Zakel (2015). Improved measurement results for the Avogadro constant using a²⁸Si-enriched crystal. Metrologia, 52(2), 360-375.
31. G Kirakosyan (2010). Induced Circularly Polarized Luminescence and Exciton Fine Structure Splitting in Magnetic-Doped Chiral Perovskites. Gen. Phys, 1-7.
32. Peter Mohr,David Newell,Barry Taylor (2016). CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2014. Reviews of Modern Physics, 88(3)
33. T Oliver,G Terejanu,C Simmons,R Moser (2015). Validating predictions of unobserved quantities. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 283, 1310-1335.
34. L Szilárd (1929). On the decrease of entropy in a thermodynamic system by the intervention of intelligent beings. Behavioral Science, 9(4), 301-310.
35. Charles Bennett (1982). The thermodynamics of computation—a review. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21(12), 905-940.
36. Takahiro Sagawa,Masahito Ueda (2009). Minimal Energy Cost for Thermodynamic Information Processing: Measurement and Information Erasure. Physical Review Letters, 102(25), 250602.
37. H Leff,A Rex (2003). Maxwell's Demon 2 Entropy, Classical and Quantum Information, Computing. Maxwell's Demon 2 Entropy, Classical and Quantum Information, Computing
38. Koji Maruyama,Franco Nori,Vlatko Vedral (2009). Colloquium: The physics of Maxwell’s demon and information. Reviews of Modern Physics, 81(1), 1-23.
39. R Landauer (1961). Irreversibility and Heat Generation in the Computing Process. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 5(3), 183-191.
40. Shoichi Toyabe,Takahiro Sagawa,Masahito Ueda,Eiro Muneyuki,Masaki Sano (2010). Experimental demonstration of information-to-energy conversion and validation of the generalized Jarzynski equality. Nature Physics, 6(12), 988-992.
41. Jonne Koski,Ville Maisi,Jukka Pekola,Dmitri Averin (2014). Experimental realization of a Szilard engine with a single electron. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(38), 13786-13789.
42. B Menin (2015). Possible limits of accuracy in measurement of fundamental physical constants. International Referred Journal of Engineering and Science, 4(8), 8-14.
43. M Volkenstein (2009). Designer Profile 2008/2009: Graphic + Multimedia Design. Designer Profile 2008/2009: Graphic + Multimedia Design
44. S.-L Liu (2017). Electromagnetic fields, size, and copy of a single photon. Electromagnetic fields, size, and copy of a single photon, 1-4.
45. Boris Menin (2018). Bekenstein-Bound and Information-Based Approach. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 06(08), 1675-1685.
46. J Schement,B Ruben (1993). Information Theory and Communication. Transaction Publishers, 4, 43-53.
47. Jacob Bekenstein (1981). Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems. Physical Review D, 23(2), 287-298.
48. Max Pettini,Ryan Cooke (2015). Precision cosmology with the lightest elements. Astrophysics and Space Science, 371(2), 1-11.
49. Jie Wang (2011). WMAP (Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe): Revealing Our Universe in Its Infancy. Astronomers' Universe, 347-358.
50. P Davies (2007). The Implications of a Cosmological Information Bound for Complexity, Quantum Information and the Nature of Physical Law. Randomness and Complexity, From Leibniz to Chaitin, 69-87.
51. W Zurek (1989). Algorithmic randomness and physical entropy. Physical Review A, 40(8), 4731-4751.
52. Seth Lloyd (2002). Computational Capacity of the Universe. Physical Review Letters, 88(23), 1-4.
53. A Mukhopadhyay (2008). A Theory of Wonder: Evolution, Brain and the Radical Nature of Science [PDF, E-Book]. Frontier Perspectives, 16(2), 19-29.
54. Ioannis Haranas,Ioannis Gkigkitzis (2014). BEKENSTEIN BOUND OF INFORMATION NUMBER N AND ITS RELATION TO COSMOLOGICAL PARAMETERS IN A UNIVERSE WITH AND WITHOUT COSMOLOGICAL CONSTANT. Modern Physics Letters A, 28(19), 1350077.
55. T Padmanabhan,Hamsa Padmanabhan (2017). Cosmic information, the cosmological constant and the amplitude of primordial perturbations. Physics Letters B, 773, 81-85.
56. Mark Burgin (2003). Information Theory: a Multifaceted Model of Information. Entropy, 5(2), 146-160.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Boris Menin. 2019. "A Look at the Uncertainty of Measuring The Fundamental Constants and the Maxwell Demon from the Perspective of the Information Approach". Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics GJRE-A Volume 19 (GJRE Volume 19 Issue A1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 19 Issue A1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJRE-A Classification FOR Code: 091399

Submission ReceivedDecember 10, 2018
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 31, 2018
Published January 15, 2019

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 17, 2019

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 101

Country: Israel

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics

Authors: Boris Menin (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 397

Total Views (Real + Logic): 840

Total Downloads (simulated): 68

Publish Date: 2019 01, Tue

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 54 views
Month 2: 30 views
Month 3: 37 views
Month 4: 25 views
Month 5: 50 views
Month 6: 27 views
Month 7: 39 views
Month 8: 39 views
Month 9: 21 views
Month 10: 19 views
Month 11: 43 views
Month 12: 30 views
Month 13: 41 views
Month 14: 38 views
Month 15: 19 views
Month 16: 24 views
Month 17: 40 views
Month 18: 31 views
Month 19: 30 views
Month 20: 28 views
Month 21: 37 views
Month 22: 12 views
Month 23: 19 views
Month 24: 19 views
Month 25: 36 views
Month 26: 23 views
Month 27: 29 views
Month 28: 29 views
Month 29: 29 views
Month 30: 30 views
Month 31: 22 views
Month 32: 27 views
Month 33: 16 views
Month 34: 29 views
Month 35: 32 views
Month 36: 31 views
Month 37: 27 views
Month 38: 26 views
Month 39: 37 views
Month 40: 28 views
Month 41: 38 views
Month 42: 23 views
Month 43: 47 views
Month 44: 21 views
Month 45: 35 views
Month 46: 10 views
Month 47: 33 views
Month 48: 27 views
Month 49: 21 views
Month 50: 31 views
Month 51: 41 views
Month 52: 24 views
Month 53: 16 views
Month 54: 46 views
Month 55: 39 views
Month 56: 25 views
Month 57: 36 views
Month 58: 23 views
Month 59: 43 views
Month 60: 23 views
Month 61: 34 views
Month 62: 36 views
Month 63: 22 views
Month 64: 18 views
Month 65: 24 views
Month 66: 33 views
Month 67: 25 views
Month 68: 44 views
Month 69: 17 views
Month 70: 36 views
Month 71: 42 views
Month 72: 36 views
Month 73: 25 views
Month 74: 37 views
Month 75: 33 views
Month 76: 39 views
Month 77: 18 views
Month 78: 49 views
Month 79: 27 views
Month 80: 29 views
Month 81: 27 views
Month 82: 32 views
Month 83: 36 views
Month 84: 39 views
Month 85: 50 views
Month 86: 56 views
Month 87: 58 views
Month 88: 24 views
Month 89: 30 views
Month 90: 35 views
Month 91: 29 views
Month 92: 54 views
Month 93: 51 views
Month 94: 40 views

Total Views: 840

Total Downloads: 68

All Trends