A Novel Erasure Coding Based on Reed Solomon Fault Tolerance for Cloud Based Storage

Satyanandam.N; Ramprakash Kota

A Novel Erasure Coding Based on Reed Solomon Fault Tolerance for Cloud Based Storage

Satyanandam.N * §

Contact

Ramprakash Kota

Contact

§ ANU

A Novel Erasure Coding Based on Reed Solomon Fault Tolerance for Cloud Based Storage

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTN9R89

A Novel Erasure Coding Based on Reed Solomon Fault Tolerance for Cloud Based Storage Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

In the recent years growth in usage of Erasure codes for fault tolerance is been observed. The growth in distributed storage solutions is the root cause of this growth. Multiple research is been carried out to propose the optimal fault tolerance solution for distributed storage solutions. However the recent storage solutions have shown a migration towards to the cloud based storage solutions. The growth of cloud computing and the benefits to the customer is the core of this migrations. Thus the applications managing the storage solutions have also updated with the demand. Hence the recent researches are driven by the demand of optimal fault tolerance solutions. Here in this work we propose an optimal erasure code based fault tolerance solution specific for cloud storage solutions. The work is been considered for commercial cloud based storage solution. The final outcome of this work is improvement on Bit Error Rate for the proposed Novel Erasure Coding based on Reed Solomon Fault Tolerance for Cloud based service.

References

12 Cites in Article

Reference Format

E Pinheiro,W Weber,L Barro So (2007). Failure Trends in a Large Disk Drive Population.
B Schroeder,G Gibson (2007). Disk Failures in the Real World: What Does an MTTF of 1,000,000 Hours Mean to You?.
C Huang,H Simitci,Y Xu,A Ogus,B Calder,P Gopalan,J Li,S Yekhanin (2012). Erasure coding in Windows Azure storage.
M Chowdhury,S Kandula,I Stoica (2013). Leveraging endpoint flexibility in data-intensive clusters.
Ajay Dholakia,Evangelos Eleftheriou,Xiao-Yu Hu,Ilias Iliadis,Jai Menon,K Rao (2008). A new intra-disk redundancy scheme for high-reliability RAID storage systems in the presence of unrecoverable errors.
James Plank,Adam Buchsbaum,Bradley Vander Zanden (2011). Minimum density RAID-6 codes.
O Khan,R Burns,J Plank,W Pierce,C Huang (2012). Rethinking erasure codes for cloud file systems: Minimizing I/O for recovery and degraded reads.
M Sathiamoorthy,M Asteris,D Papailiopoulos,A Dimakis,R Vadali,S Chen,D Borthakur (2013). XORing elephants: Novel erasure codes for big data.
Y Zhu,P Lee,L Xiang,Y Xu,L Gao (2012). A costbased heterogeneous recovery scheme for distributed storage systems with RAID-6 codes.
B Calder,J Wang,A Ogus,N Nilakantan,A Skjolsvold,S Mckelvie,Y Xu,S Srivastav,J Wu,H Simitci,J Hari Das,C Uddaraju,H Khatri,A Edwards,V Bedekar,S Mainali,R Abbasi,A Agarwal,M Ulhaq,M Ulhaq,D Bhardwaj,S Dayan,A Adusumilli,M Mc Nett,S Sankaran,K Manivannan,L Rigas (2011). Windows Azure storage: A highly available cloud storage service with strong consistency.
R Li,J Lin,P Lee (2013). CORE: Augmenting regenerating-coding-based recovery for single and concurrent failures in distributed storage systems.
Silei Xu,Runhui Li,Patrick Lee,Yunfeng Zhu,Liping Xiang,Yinlong Xu,John Lui (2014). Single Disk Failure Recovery for X-Code-Based Parallel Storage Systems.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Satyanandam.N, Ramprakash Kota. 2016. "A Novel Erasure Coding Based on Reed Solomon Fault Tolerance for Cloud Based Storage". Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - B: Cloud & Distributed GJCST-B Volume 16 (GJCST Volume 16 Issue B1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJCST Volume 16 Issue B1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

E.2

Submission ReceivedDecember 8, 2015
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 3, 2016
Published January 15, 2016

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

February 29, 2016

Language

English

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 147

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Authors: Ramprakash Kota, Dr. Rajasekhara Rao Kurra (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 424

Total Views (Real + Logic): 2534

Total Downloads (simulated): 184

Publish Date: 2016 01, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 48 views
Month 2: 37 views
Month 3: 39 views
Month 4: 33 views
Month 5: 41 views
Month 6: 21 views
Month 7: 34 views
Month 8: 48 views
Month 9: 22 views
Month 10: 47 views
Month 11: 38 views
Month 12: 27 views
Month 13: 37 views
Month 14: 19 views
Month 15: 15 views
Month 16: 34 views
Month 17: 45 views
Month 18: 30 views
Month 19: 22 views
Month 20: 28 views
Month 21: 35 views
Month 22: 39 views
Month 23: 40 views
Month 24: 44 views
Month 25: 25 views
Month 26: 41 views
Month 27: 33 views
Month 28: 26 views
Month 29: 26 views
Month 30: 32 views
Month 31: 46 views
Month 32: 38 views
Month 33: 17 views
Month 34: 17 views
Month 35: 20 views
Month 36: 43 views
Month 37: 11 views
Month 38: 33 views
Month 39: 18 views
Month 40: 24 views
Month 41: 26 views
Month 42: 17 views
Month 43: 28 views
Month 44: 19 views
Month 45: 36 views
Month 46: 44 views
Month 47: 31 views
Month 48: 29 views
Month 49: 40 views
Month 50: 22 views
Month 51: 25 views
Month 52: 36 views
Month 53: 34 views
Month 54: 35 views
Month 55: 30 views
Month 56: 19 views
Month 57: 23 views
Month 58: 36 views
Month 59: 36 views
Month 60: 49 views
Month 61: 31 views
Month 62: 27 views
Month 63: 22 views
Month 64: 38 views
Month 65: 25 views
Month 66: 27 views
Month 67: 42 views
Month 68: 31 views
Month 69: 16 views
Month 70: 30 views
Month 71: 31 views
Month 72: 26 views
Month 73: 26 views
Month 74: 22 views
Month 75: 37 views
Month 76: 37 views
Month 77: 33 views
Month 78: 37 views
Month 79: 39 views
Month 80: 18 views
Month 81: 21 views
Month 82: 24 views
Month 83: 23 views
Month 84: 36 views
Month 85: 14 views
Month 86: 18 views
Month 87: 14 views
Month 88: 34 views
Month 89: 41 views
Month 90: 26 views
Month 91: 40 views
Month 92: 22 views
Month 93: 32 views
Month 94: 24 views
Month 95: 14 views
Month 96: 30 views
Month 97: 28 views
Month 98: 32 views
Month 99: 22 views
Month 100: 18 views
Month 101: 27 views
Month 102: 39 views
Month 103: 45 views
Month 104: 44 views
Month 105: 16 views
Month 106: 25 views
Month 107: 24 views
Month 108: 31 views
Month 109: 23 views
Month 110: 21 views
Month 111: 30 views
Month 112: 17 views
Month 113: 18 views
Month 114: 46 views
Month 115: 43 views
Month 116: 33 views
Month 117: 35 views
Month 118: 39 views
Month 119: 46 views
Month 120: 34 views
Month 121: 41 views
Month 122: 72 views
Month 123: 69 views
Month 124: 76 views
Month 125: 32 views
Month 126: 43 views
Month 127: 34 views
Month 128: 29 views
Month 129: 43 views

Total Views: 2.5K

Total Downloads: 184

All Trends