A Parallel Computational Approach for String Matching- A Novel Structure with Omega Model

A Parallel Computational Approach for String Matching- A Novel Structure with Omega Model

K Butchi Raju

Contact

Dr. S. Viswanadha Raju

Contact

Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Hyderabad

A Parallel Computational Approach for String Matching- A Novel Structure with Omega Model

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTSDE529J0

A Parallel Computational Approach for String Matching- A Novel Structure with Omega Model Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

In recent day’s parallel string matching problem catch the attention of so many researchers because of the importance in different applications like IRS, Genome sequence, data cleaning etc.,. While it is very easily stated and many of the simple algorithms perform very well in practice, numerous works have been published on the subject and research is still very active. In this paper we propose a omega parallel computing model for parallel string matching. The algorithm is designed to work on omega model parallel architecture where text is divided for parallel processing and special searching at division point is required for consistent and complete searching. This algorithm reduces the number of comparisons and parallelization improves the time efficiency. Experimental results show that, on a multi-processor system, the omega model implementation of the proposed parallel string matching algorithm can reduce string matching time.

References

56 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Chinta Someswararao,S Butchiraju,Viswanadharaju (2011). Recent Advancement is Parallel Algorithms for String matching on computing models -A survey and experimental results.
Chinta Someswararao,S Butchiraju,Viswanadharaju (2011). PDM data classification from STEP-an object oriented String matching approach.
Chinta Someswararao,K Raju,S Appaji,S Raju,K Reddy (2012). Recent Advancements in Parallel Algorithms for String Matching on Computing Models – A Survey and Experimental Results.
Y Simon,M Inayatullah (2004). Improving Approximate Matching Capabilities for Meta Map Transfer Applications.
Chinta Someswararao,S Butchiraju,Viswanadharaju (2012). Parallel Algorithms for String Matching Problem based on Butterfly Model.
Chinta Someswararao,S Butchiraju,Viswanadharaju (2013). Recent Advancement is String matching algorithms-A survey and experimental results.
S Raju (2012). parallel string matching algorithm using grid.
Leslie Valiant (1990). A bridging model for parallel computation.
I Foster (1996). Designing and Building Paral lel Programs.
(1991). Argonne National Laboratory annual report of laboratory directed research and development program activities for FY 1995..
J Darlington,M Ghanem,H To (1993). Structured parallel programming.
N Tuck,T Sherwood,B Calder,G Varghese (2004). Deterministic Memory-Efficient String Matching Algorithms for Intrusion Detection.
S Dharmapurikar,P Krishnamurthy,T Sproull,J Lockwood (2004). Deep packet inspection using parallel bloom filters.
J Nandhini,Dr Nithya,Dr Prabhakaran (2019). ADVANCE VIRUS DETECTION USING COMBINED TECHNIQUES OF PATTERN MATCHING AND DYNAMIC INSTRUCTION SEQUENCES.
O Safaa,Al-Mamory String Matching Enhancement for Snort IDS.
S Dharmapurikar,J Lockwood (2006). Fast and Scalable Pattern Matching for Network Intrusion Detection Systems.
N Hua,H Song,T Lakshman (2009). Variablestride multipattern matching for scalable deep packet inspection.
H Lu,K Zheng,B Liu,X Zhang,Y Liu (2006). A Memory-Efficient Parallel String Matching Architecture for High-Speed Intrusion Detection.
B Brodie,D Taylor,R Cytron (2006). A Scalable Architecture For High-Throughput Regular-Expression Pattern Matching.
D Ficara,G Antichi,A Di Pietro,S Giordano,G Procissi,F Vitucci (2010). Sampling Techniques to Accelerate Pattern Matching in Network Intrusion Detection Systems.
Wang Xiaofei,Hu Chengchen,Yi,Ting,Liu Wu Chunming,Bin,Wang Xiaojun (2012). Parallel Length-based Matching Architecture for High Throughput Multi-Pattern Matching.
Hyunjin Kim,Seung-Woo Lee (2013). A Hardware-Based String Matching Using State Transition Compression for Deep Packet Inspection.
Akhtar Rasool,Nilay Khare (2012). Parallelization of KMP String Matching Algorithm on Different SIMD Architectures: Multi-Core and GPGPU's.
Cheng Zhong,Guo-Liang Chen (2007). A Fast Determinate String Matching Algorithm for the Network Intrusion Detection Systems.
Panwei Cao,Suping Wu (2011). Parallel Research on KMP Algorithm.
Wei Lin,Bin Liu (2008). Pipelined Parallel AC-Based Approach for Multi-String Matching.
Chuanpeng Chen,Zhongping Qin (2009). A bit-split byte-parallel string matching architecture.
Hyunjin Kim,Hyejeong Hong,Hong-Sik Kim,Sungho Kang (2009). A Memory-Efficient Parallel String Matching for Intrusion Detection Systems.
Mansoor Alicherry,M Muthuprasanna,Vijay Kumar (2006). High Speed Pattern Matching for Network IDS/IPS.
D Pao,W Lin,B Liu (2010). A memory-efficient pipelined implementation of the Aho-Corasick string-matching algorithm.
Wei Lin,Bin Liu (2008). Pipelined Parallel AC-Based Approach for Multi-String Matching.
N Hua,H Song,T Lakshman (2009). Variable-Stride Multi-Pattern Matching For Scalable Deep Packet Inspection.
D Scarpazza,O Villa,F Petrini (2008). Exact multipattern string matching on the cell/b.e. processor.
Yutaka Sugawara,Mary Inaba,Kei Hiraki (2004). Over 10Gbps String Matching Mechanism for Multi-stream Packet Scanning Systems.
Hyunjin Kim (2010). A Memory-Efficient Bit-Split Parallel String Matching using Pattern Dividing for Intrusion Detection Systems.
E Yi-Hua,Yang,K Viktor,Prasanna (2012). Robust and Scalable String Pattern Matching for Deep Packet Inspection on Multi-core Processors.
Yi Tang,Junchen Jiang,Xiaofei Wang,Bin Liu,Yang Xu (2010). Independent Parallel Compact Finite Automatons for Accelerating Multi-String Matching.
S Ksmv Kumar,A Viswanadha Raju,Govardhan (2013). Overlapped Text Partition Algorithm for Pattern Matching on Hypercube Networked Model.
Benben Yao Xin,Liu,Willx Biao Min,Li,C Ray,Anthony Cheung,Ting Fong,Chan Fung (2013). Parallel architecture for DNA sequence inexact matching with Burrows-Wheeler Transform.
Hoang Le,Viktor Prasanna (2013). A Memory-Efficient and Modular Approach for Large-Scale String Pattern Matching.
Tan Jianlong (2011). Speeding up Pattern Matching by Optimal Partial String Extraction.
Rajesh Prasad,Suneeta Agarwal,Ishadutta Yadav,Bharat Singh (2011). Efficient bit-parallel multi-patterns string matching algorithms for limited expression.
M Mosleh,Abu-Alhaj (2010). An Innovative Platform To Improve The Performance Of Exact-String Matching ALGORITHMS.
Benedikt Forchhammer,Thorsten Papenbrock,Thomas Stening,Sven Viehmeier,Uwe Draisbach,Felix Naumann (2013). Duplicate Detection on GPUs.
Antonino Tumeo,Oreste Villa,Daniel Chavarria-Miranda (2011). Aho-Corasick String Matching on Shared and Distributed-Memory Parallel Architectures.
Antonino Tumeo,Oreste Villa,Daniel Chavarria-Miranda (2012). Aho-Corasick String Matching on Shared and Distributed-Memory Parallel Architectures.
B Vinod,Sagar (2013). Hash-Based String Matching Algorithm For Network Intrusion Prevention systems (NIPS).
Oren Ben-Kiki,Philip Bille,Dany Breslauer,Leszek Gasieniec,Roberto Grossi,Oren Weimann (2013). Towards Optimal Packed String Matching.
H Cheng,K Fu (1987). VLSI architectures for string matching and pattern matching.
P Daniel,Lopresti (1987). P-NAC : A Systolic Array for Comparing Nucleic Acid Sequences.
Amar Mukhopadhyay (1979). Hardware Algorithms for Nonnumeric Computation.
Bradly Fawcett (1995). Emms, Peter Fawcett, (born 25 April 1935), public administration consultant in former communist countries, 1995.
Foster,Kung (1980). The Design of Special-Purpose VLSI Chips.
Carla Correa Tavares Dos Reis,Oswaldo Cruz (2005). Approximate String Matching Algorithm Using Parallel Methods for Molecular Sequence Camparisons.
Muhammad Zubair,Fazal Wahab,Iftikhar Hussain,Muhammad Ikram (2010). Text scanning approach for exact string matching.
I Tomohiro,Shunsuke Inenaga,Masayuki Takeda (2013). Palindrome pattern matching.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

K Butchi Raju. 2013. \u201cA Parallel Computational Approach for String Matching- A Novel Structure with Omega Model\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering GJCST-C Volume 13 (GJCST Volume 13 Issue C12).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJCST Volume 13 Issue C12

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

computing model omega mode l parallel string matching string matching

Submission ReceivedDecember 7, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 31, 2012
Published January 15, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 28, 2013

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 107

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering

Authors: K Butchi Raju, Dr. S. Viswanadha Raju (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 247

Total Views (Real + Logic): 9403

Total Downloads (simulated): 2468

Publish Date: 2013 12, Sat

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 52 views
Month 2: 41 views
Month 3: 61 views
Month 4: 33 views
Month 5: 44 views
Month 6: 26 views
Month 7: 28 views
Month 8: 36 views
Month 9: 32 views
Month 10: 42 views
Month 11: 32 views
Month 12: 42 views
Month 13: 24 views
Month 14: 32 views
Month 15: 39 views
Month 16: 32 views
Month 17: 47 views
Month 18: 29 views
Month 19: 44 views
Month 20: 34 views
Month 21: 20 views
Month 22: 20 views
Month 23: 19 views
Month 24: 19 views
Month 25: 23 views
Month 26: 38 views
Month 27: 28 views
Month 28: 27 views
Month 29: 40 views
Month 30: 33 views
Month 31: 20 views
Month 32: 23 views
Month 33: 12 views
Month 34: 24 views
Month 35: 18 views
Month 36: 14 views
Month 37: 39 views
Month 38: 40 views
Month 39: 25 views
Month 40: 20 views
Month 41: 12 views
Month 42: 25 views
Month 43: 42 views
Month 44: 40 views
Month 45: 37 views
Month 46: 33 views
Month 47: 25 views
Month 48: 36 views
Month 49: 33 views
Month 50: 31 views
Month 51: 18 views
Month 52: 40 views
Month 53: 27 views
Month 54: 22 views
Month 55: 43 views
Month 56: 43 views
Month 57: 35 views
Month 58: 15 views
Month 59: 29 views
Month 60: 39 views
Month 61: 43 views
Month 62: 47 views
Month 63: 29 views
Month 64: 30 views
Month 65: 23 views
Month 66: 32 views
Month 67: 36 views
Month 68: 46 views
Month 69: 29 views
Month 70: 17 views
Month 71: 28 views
Month 72: 38 views
Month 73: 27 views
Month 74: 33 views
Month 75: 24 views
Month 76: 46 views
Month 77: 22 views
Month 78: 26 views
Month 79: 19 views
Month 80: 29 views
Month 81: 44 views
Month 82: 32 views
Month 83: 29 views
Month 84: 19 views
Month 85: 34 views
Month 86: 39 views
Month 87: 32 views
Month 88: 33 views
Month 89: 31 views
Month 90: 31 views
Month 91: 43 views
Month 92: 38 views
Month 93: 19 views
Month 94: 17 views
Month 95: 36 views
Month 96: 15 views
Month 97: 41 views
Month 98: 37 views
Month 99: 35 views
Month 100: 40 views
Month 101: 24 views
Month 102: 23 views
Month 103: 33 views
Month 104: 13 views
Month 105: 42 views
Month 106: 26 views
Month 107: 20 views
Month 108: 17 views
Month 109: 33 views
Month 110: 32 views
Month 111: 30 views
Month 112: 28 views
Month 113: 35 views
Month 114: 30 views
Month 115: 24 views
Month 116: 44 views
Month 117: 32 views
Month 118: 28 views
Month 119: 30 views
Month 120: 32 views
Month 121: 36 views
Month 122: 19 views
Month 123: 24 views
Month 124: 34 views
Month 125: 25 views
Month 126: 26 views
Month 127: 21 views
Month 128: 40 views
Month 129: 40 views
Month 130: 43 views
Month 131: 32 views
Month 132: 34 views
Month 133: 16 views
Month 134: 39 views
Month 135: 29 views
Month 136: 19 views
Month 137: 33 views
Month 138: 33 views
Month 139: 44 views
Month 140: 34 views
Month 141: 41 views
Month 142: 34 views
Month 143: 28 views
Month 144: 39 views
Month 145: 30 views
Month 146: 19 views
Month 147: 68 views
Month 148: 50 views
Month 149: 50 views

Total Views: 9403

Total Downloads: 2468

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]