A Pardigm for Economic Growth in the 21st Century

1
Ordean Olson
Ordean Olson

Send Message

To: Author

GJHSS Volume 17 Issue E3

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

FRTF8

A Pardigm for Economic Growth in the 21st Century Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

This study presents a paradigm for determining economic equilibrium in economic systems. The economic disequilibria curve is introduced and shows the robust correlation between productivity and exchange rates and plots the optimal rate of economic growth and interest rates along the economic disequilibria curve. This study examines the evidence for a productivity based model of the dollar/euro real exchange rate. Cointegrating relationships between the real exchange rate and productivity, real price of oil and government spending are estimated using the Johansen and Stock-Watson procedures. The findings show that for each percentage point in the US-Euro productivity differential there is a three point change in the real dollar/euro valuation. These findings are robust to the estimation methodology, the variables included in the regression, and the sample period.

24 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Ron Alquist,Menzie Chinn (2002). Productivity and the Euro-Dollar Exchange Rate Puzzle.
  2. R Amano,S Van Norden (1998). Oil prices and the rise and fall of the US real exchange rate.
  3. A Bailey,S Wells (2001). Capital Flows and Exchange Rates.
  4. Bela Balassa (1964). The Purchasing Power Parity Doctrice: A Reappraisal.
  5. M Bartless (1950). Tests of Significance in Factor Analysis.
  6. Bertrand Candelon,Helmut Lütkepohl (2001). On the reliability of Chow-type tests for parameter constancy in multivariate dynamic models.
  7. Jörg Clostermann,Bernd Schnatz (2000). The Determinants of the Euro-Dollar Exchange Rate - Synthetic Fundamentals and a Non-Existing Currency.
  8. J De Gregorio,H Giovannini,Wolf (1994). International Evidence on Tradables and Nontradables Inflation.
  9. Practical Issues in Cointegration Analysis.
  10. J Doornik,H Hansen (1994). An Omnibus Test for Univariate and Multivariate Normality.
  11. E Engel (1999). Accounting for US Real Exchange Rate Changes.
  12. C Fisher (2002). Real Currency Appreciation in EU Accession Countries: Balassa-[] Samuelson and Investment Demand.
  13. J Frenkel,M Mussa (1995). Asset Markets, Exchange Rates and the Balance of Payments.
  14. Wayne Fuller (1976). Introduction to Statistical Time Series.
  15. Roy Harrod (1933). International Economics.
  16. L Godfrey (1988). Misspecification Tests in Econometrics.
  17. C Grnager (1969). Investigating Casual Relations by Econometric models and Cross-Spectral Methods.
  18. Henrik Hansen,Søren Johansen (1999). Some tests for parameter constancy in cointegrated VAR‐models.
  19. C Jarque,A Bera (1987). A Test for Normality of Observations and Regression Residuals.
  20. S Johansen (1995). Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Auto-Regresssive Models.
  21. R King,C Plosser,M Watson (1991). Stochastic Trends and Economic Fluctuations.
  22. Dale Jorgenson,Kevin Stiroh (2000). Raising the Speed Limit: U.S. Economic Growth in the Information Age.
  23. Z Lominski (1961). Tests for Departure from Normality in the Case of Linear Stochastic Processes.
  24. Helmut Lutkepohl (1991). Introduction to Multiple Time Series.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Ordean Olson. 2017. \u201cA Pardigm for Economic Growth in the 21st Century\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - E: Economics GJHSS-E Volume 17 (GJHSS Volume 17 Issue E3): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJHSS Volume 17 Issue E3
Pg. 29- 44
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-E Classification: FOR Code: 910103
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 14, 2017

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3418
Total Downloads: 1667
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

This study presents a paradigm for determining economic equilibrium in economic systems. The economic disequilibria curve is introduced and shows the robust correlation between productivity and exchange rates and plots the optimal rate of economic growth and interest rates along the economic disequilibria curve. This study examines the evidence for a productivity based model of the dollar/euro real exchange rate. Cointegrating relationships between the real exchange rate and productivity, real price of oil and government spending are estimated using the Johansen and Stock-Watson procedures. The findings show that for each percentage point in the US-Euro productivity differential there is a three point change in the real dollar/euro valuation. These findings are robust to the estimation methodology, the variables included in the regression, and the sample period.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

A Pardigm for Economic Growth in the 21st Century

Ordean Olson
Ordean Olson

Research Journals