A Randomised Controlled Study of Intramuscular Camylofin Dihydrochloride vs Intravenous Hyoscine Butylbromide in Augmentation of Labour

1
Dr Shridhar S. Dayama
Dr Shridhar S. Dayama
2
Dr Sunil S.Patil
Dr Sunil S.Patil
3
Dr Pradip W. Sambarey
Dr Pradip W. Sambarey
2 B.J.Govt.Medical College and Sassoon Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Send Message

To: Author

GJMR Volume 16 Issue E1

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

X1269

A Randomised Controlled Study of Intramuscular Camylofin Dihydrochloride vs Intravenous Hyoscine Butylbromide in Augmentation of Labour Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

The objective of our study was to evaluate, in a population of Togolese People Living With HIV(PLWHIV), the agreement between three scores derived from the general population namely the Framingham score, the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE), the evaluation of the cardiovascular risk (CVR) according to the World Health Organization.
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Aims and objectives-to study and compare the effectiveness of injection Camylofin and injection Hyoscine in accelerating active phase of the 1st stage of labour in uncomplicated pregnancies. Second was to study the effects of the two drugs on 2nd and 3rd stage of labour and to study the adverse drug reactions on the mother and fetus. Method-This was randomized controlled prospective study.150 Primigravida in the age group 18 to 30 years with gestational age 37 to 40 weeks were included. The cases were divided into 3 groups Group I consisted 50 women which was Control Group. Group II consisted of 50 women who were given injection Camylofin intramuscular. Group III consisted of 50 women who were given injection Hyoscine intravenous. Result-There was significant reduction in duration of active phase of labour and improvement in the rate of cervical dilatation with Camylofin compared to Hyoscine butylbromide. There were no maternal, fetal side effects associated to these drugs.

Article content is being processed or not available yet.

6 Cites in Articles

References

  1. G Liggins (1978). Ripening of the cervix.
  2. Phyllis Leppert (1995). Anatomy and physiology of cervical ripening.
  3. H Warke,A Chauhan,V Raut,K Ingle (2003). Efficacy of camylofin dihydrochloride in acceleration of labour: A randomised double blind trial.
  4. S Kaur,S Bajwa,P Kaur,Bhupals (2013). To compare the effect of Camylofin dihydrochloride (Anafortan) with combination of Valethamate Bromide (Epidosin) and Hyoscine Butyl bromide (Buscopan) on cervical dilatation.
  5. K Singh,P Jain,N Goel (2004). Drotaverine Hydrochloride for augmentation of labour.
  6. K Tiwari,R Jabeen,N Sabzposh,J Rabbani (2003). Comparison of Hyoscine N -butyl bromide and Valethamate bromide in shortening the duration of labour.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Dr Sunil S.Patil. 2016. \u201cA Randomised Controlled Study of Intramuscular Camylofin Dihydrochloride vs Intravenous Hyoscine Butylbromide in Augmentation of Labour\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - E: Gynecology & Obstetrics GJMR-E Volume 16 (GJMR Volume 16 Issue E1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords
Classification
GJMR-E Classification: NLMC Code: WJ 190
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 3, 2016

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3912
Total Downloads: 2068
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Article in Review

Aims and objectives-to study and compare the effectiveness of injection Camylofin and injection Hyoscine in accelerating active phase of the 1st stage of labour in uncomplicated pregnancies. Second was to study the effects of the two drugs on 2nd and 3rd stage of labour and to study the adverse drug reactions on the mother and fetus. Method-This was randomized controlled prospective study.150 Primigravida in the age group 18 to 30 years with gestational age 37 to 40 weeks were included. The cases were divided into 3 groups Group I consisted 50 women which was Control Group. Group II consisted of 50 women who were given injection Camylofin intramuscular. Group III consisted of 50 women who were given injection Hyoscine intravenous. Result-There was significant reduction in duration of active phase of labour and improvement in the rate of cervical dilatation with Camylofin compared to Hyoscine butylbromide. There were no maternal, fetal side effects associated to these drugs.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

A Randomised Controlled Study of Intramuscular Camylofin Dihydrochloride vs Intravenous Hyoscine Butylbromide in Augmentation of Labour

Dr Shridhar S. Dayama
Dr Shridhar S. Dayama
Dr Sunil S.Patil
Dr Sunil S.Patil B.J.Govt.Medical College and Sassoon Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Dr Pradip W. Sambarey
Dr Pradip W. Sambarey

Research Journals