A Randomised Controlled Study of Intramuscular Camylofin Dihydrochloride vs Intravenous Hyoscine Butylbromide in Augmentation of Labour

α
Dr Sunil S.Patil
Dr Sunil S.Patil
σ
Dr Shridhar S. Dayama
Dr Shridhar S. Dayama
ρ
Dr Pradip W. Sambarey
Dr Pradip W. Sambarey
α B.J.Govt.Medical College and Sassoon Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India B.J.Govt.Medical College and Sassoon Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Send Message

To: Author

A Randomised Controlled Study of Intramuscular Camylofin Dihydrochloride vs Intravenous Hyoscine Butylbromide in Augmentation of Labour

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

X1269

A Randomised Controlled Study of Intramuscular Camylofin Dihydrochloride vs Intravenous Hyoscine Butylbromide in Augmentation of Labour Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

Aims and objectives-to study and compare the effectiveness of injection Camylofin and injection Hyoscine in accelerating active phase of the 1st stage of labour in uncomplicated pregnancies. Second was to study the effects of the two drugs on 2nd and 3rd stage of labour and to study the adverse drug reactions on the mother and fetus. Method-This was randomized controlled prospective study.150 Primigravida in the age group 18 to 30 years with gestational age 37 to 40 weeks were included. The cases were divided into 3 groups Group I consisted 50 women which was Control Group. Group II consisted of 50 women who were given injection Camylofin intramuscular. Group III consisted of 50 women who were given injection Hyoscine intravenous. Result-There was significant reduction in duration of active phase of labour and improvement in the rate of cervical dilatation with Camylofin compared to Hyoscine butylbromide. There were no maternal, fetal side effects associated to these drugs.

References

6 Cites in Article
  1. G Liggins (1978). Ripening of the cervix.
  2. Phyllis Leppert (1995). Anatomy and physiology of cervical ripening.
  3. H Warke,A Chauhan,V Raut,K Ingle (2003). Efficacy of camylofin dihydrochloride in acceleration of labour: A randomised double blind trial.
  4. S Kaur,S Bajwa,P Kaur,Bhupals (2013). To compare the effect of Camylofin dihydrochloride (Anafortan) with combination of Valethamate Bromide (Epidosin) and Hyoscine Butyl bromide (Buscopan) on cervical dilatation.
  5. K Singh,P Jain,N Goel (2004). Drotaverine Hydrochloride for augmentation of labour.
  6. K Tiwari,R Jabeen,N Sabzposh,J Rabbani (2003). Comparison of Hyoscine N -butyl bromide and Valethamate bromide in shortening the duration of labour.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr Sunil S.Patil. 2016. \u201cA Randomised Controlled Study of Intramuscular Camylofin Dihydrochloride vs Intravenous Hyoscine Butylbromide in Augmentation of Labour\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - E: Gynecology & Obstetrics GJMR-E Volume 16 (GJMR Volume 16 Issue E1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords
Classification
GJMR-E Classification: NLMC Code: WJ 190
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

May 3, 2016

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3967
Total Downloads: 2032
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

Aims and objectives-to study and compare the effectiveness of injection Camylofin and injection Hyoscine in accelerating active phase of the 1st stage of labour in uncomplicated pregnancies. Second was to study the effects of the two drugs on 2nd and 3rd stage of labour and to study the adverse drug reactions on the mother and fetus. Method-This was randomized controlled prospective study.150 Primigravida in the age group 18 to 30 years with gestational age 37 to 40 weeks were included. The cases were divided into 3 groups Group I consisted 50 women which was Control Group. Group II consisted of 50 women who were given injection Camylofin intramuscular. Group III consisted of 50 women who were given injection Hyoscine intravenous. Result-There was significant reduction in duration of active phase of labour and improvement in the rate of cervical dilatation with Camylofin compared to Hyoscine butylbromide. There were no maternal, fetal side effects associated to these drugs.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

A Randomised Controlled Study of Intramuscular Camylofin Dihydrochloride vs Intravenous Hyoscine Butylbromide in Augmentation of Labour

Dr Shridhar S. Dayama
Dr Shridhar S. Dayama
Dr Sunil S.Patil
Dr Sunil S.Patil B.J.Govt.Medical College and Sassoon Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Dr Pradip W. Sambarey
Dr Pradip W. Sambarey

Research Journals