A Sediment Phytoattenuation Evaluation by Four Sessions of Vetiver Planting and Harvesting

A Sediment Phytoattenuation Evaluation by Four Sessions of Vetiver Planting and Harvesting

T. Y. Yeh

Contact

C L Lin

Contact

National University of Kaohsiung

A Sediment Phytoattenuation Evaluation by Four Sessions of Vetiver Planting and Harvesting

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

18069

A Sediment Phytoattenuation Evaluation by Four Sessions of Vetiver Planting and Harvesting Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Phytoattenuation is a novel green remediation approach which can be employed in both a sediment and a soil decomination. Pot experiments have been conducted to evaluation two pollution levels of a sediments consisted of high pollution from swine industries and low contamination from campus wetland. EDTA demonstrated satisfactory metal uptake and mobility enhancement has been achieved. Pb is less mobile which induced low vetiver translocation while Zn is the most mobile which possesses high bioavailability. Four sessions of planting and harvesting gradually decreasing Cu and Zn levels the constrictions decreasing to achieve local a sediment criteria which can be used for agricultural a soil conditioning. The results of this study is prominent with gradually mitigating a sediment contamination is less detriment to a sediment properties relative to commonly used a soil washing.

References

35 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Syam Andra,Rupali Datta,Dibyendu Sarkar,Sumathi Saminathan,Conor Mullens,Stephan Bach (2009). Analysis of phytochelatin complexes in the lead tolerant vetiver grass [Vetiveria zizanioides (L.)] using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry.
Yahua Chen,Zhenguo Shen,Xiangdong Li (2004). The use of vetiver grass (Vetiveria zizanioides) in the phytoremediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals.
S Doumett,L Lamperi,L Checchini,E Azzarello,S Mugnai,S Mancuso,G Petruzzelli,M Bubba (2008). Heavy metal distribution between contaminated a sediment and Paulownia tomentosa, in a pilot-scale assisted phytoremediation study: Influence of different complexing agents.
Eriberto Vagner Freitas,Clístenes Williams Nascimento,Adailson Souza (2013). Fernando Bruno SilvaCitric acid-assisted phytoextraction of lead: A field experiment.
E Meers,S Van Slycken,K Adriaensen,A Ruttens,J Vangronsveld,G Du Laing,N Witters,T Thewys,F Tack (2010). The use of bio-energy crops (Zea mays) for ‘phytoattenuation’ of heavy metals on moderately contaminated soils: A field experiment.
Mwh Evangelou,U Bauer,M Ebel,A Schaeffer (2007). The influence of EDDS and EDTA on the uptake of heavy metals of Cd and Cu from a sediment with tobacco Nicotiana tabacum.
L Epelde,J Hernández-Allica,J Becerril,F Blanco,C Garbisu (2008). Effects of chelates on plants and a sediment microbial community: Comparison of EDTA and EDDS for lead phytoextraction.
Nascimento Freitas Evds,Cwad (2009). The use of NTA for lead phytoextraction from a sediment from a battery recycling site.
Liliane Jean,François Bordas,Cécile Gautier-Moussard,Philippe Vernay,Adnane Hitmi,Jean-Claude Bollinger (2008). Effect of citric acid and EDTA on chromium and nickel uptake and translocation by Datura innoxia.
I Kim,K Kang,P Johnson-Green,L Ej (2003). Investigation of heavy metal accumulation in Polygonum thunbergii for phytoextraction.
Boštjan Kos,Domen Leštan (2004). Chelator induced phytoextraction and in situ soil washing of Cu.
Michael Komárek,Pavel Tlustoš,Jiřina Száková,Vladislav Chrastný,Vojtěch Ettler (2007). The use of maize and poplar in chelant-enhanced phytoextraction of lead from contaminated agricultural soils.
M Komárek,A Vaněk,L Mrnka,R Sudová,J Száková,V Tejnecký,V Chrastný (2010). Potential and drawbacks of EDDS-enhanced phytoextraction of copper from contaminated a sediments.
Domen Leštan,Chun-Ling Luo,Xiang-Dong Li (2008). The use of chelating agents in the remediation of metal-contaminated soils: A review.
C Lin,J Liu,L Liu,T Zhu,L Sheng,D Wang (2009). &_version=1&_urlVersi on=0&_userid=1579755&md5=c26339ea96205a4 8cfec6058563bf14c&searchtype=a" amendment application frequency contributes to phytoextraction of lead by sunflower at different nutrient levels.
M Quartacci,B Irtelli,Ajm Baker,F Navari-Izzo (2007). Theuse of NTA and EDDS for enhanced phytoextraction of metals from a multiply contaminated a sediment by Brassica carinata.
Fabiana Santos,Javier Hernández-Allica,José Becerril,Nelson Amaral-Sobrinho,Nelson Mazur,Carlos Garbisu (2006). Chelate-induced phytoextraction of metal polluted soils with Brachiaria decumbens.
Yue-Bing Sun,Qi-Xing Zhou,Jing An,Wei-Tao Liu,Rui Liu (2009). Chelator-enhanced phytoextraction of heavy metals from contaminated soil irrigated by industrial wastewater with the hyperaccumulator plant (Sedum alfredii Hance).
S Salati,G Quadri,F Tambone,F Adani (2010). Fresh organic matter of municipal solid waste enhances phytoextraction of heavy metals from contaminated a sediment.
Saifullah,Munir Zia,Erik Meers,Abdul Ghafoor,Ghulam Murtaza,Muhammad Sabir,Muhammad Zia-Ur-Rehman,Fmg Tack (2010). Chemically enhanced phytoextraction of Pb by wheat in texturally different soils.
Susan Tandy,Rainer Schulin,Bernd Nowack (2006). The influence of EDDS on the uptake of heavy metals in hydroponically grown sunflowers.
P Tanhan,M Kruatrachue,P Pokethitiyook,R Chaiyarat (2007). Uptake and accumulation of cadmium, lead and zinc by Siam weed [Chromolaena odorata (L.) King & Robinson].
A Tessier,Pgc Campbell,M Bisson (1979). Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals.
Cafer Turgut,M Katie Pepe,Teresa Cutright (2005). The effect of EDTA on Helianthus annuus uptake, selectivity, and translocation of heavy metals when grown in Ohio, New Mexico and Colombia soils.
Mohammad Valipour,S Mousavi,R Valipour,E Rezaei (2013). Analyzing precipitation predictions in Iran.
M Valipour,M Banihabib,S Behbahani (2012). Monthly Inflow Forecasting using Autoregressive Artificial Neural Network.
X Wang,Y Wang,Q Mahmood,E Islam,Jin Li,T Yang,X Liu,D (2009). The effect of EDDS addition on the phytoextraction efficiency from Pb contaminated a sediment by Sedum alfredii Hance.
Ye-Tao Tang,Teng-Hao-Bo Deng,Qi-Hang Wu,Wang Shi-Zhong,Rong- Liang,Qiu Ze-Bin,Wei,Xiao-Fang Guo,Qi-Tang Wu,Lei Mei,Chen Tong-Bin,G Echevarria,T Sterckeman,M Simonnot,J (2012). MOREL Designing Cropping Systems for Metal-Contaminated Sites: A Review Original Research Article Pedosphere.
Hanen Zaier,Tahar Ghnaya,Kilani Ben Rejeb,Abdelbasset Lakhdar,Salwa Rejeb,Fatima Jemal (2010). Effects of EDTA on phytoextraction of heavy metals (Zn, Mn and Pb) from sludge-amended soil with Brassica napus.
Nascimento (2004). Table 3: Cu accumulation in roots (mg/kg), leaves (mg/kg) and stems (mg/kg) on <i>H. cannabinus</i> seedlings grown under different levels of Cu (µmol L <sup>−1</sup> )..
Sudova (2007). Figure 3 – Pb content in the vegetation of the Severny dump, mg/kg air. dry in-va.
Lim (2004). Brassica juncea EDTA 2 mmol/kg Root part： Pb 350 mg/kg Aerial part： Pb 1.11 Pb 390mg/kg EDTA 5 mmol/kg Root part： Pb 420 mg/kg Aerial part： Pb 690mg/kg Pb 1.
Cutright Chen (2001). Figure 8: Changes of TN (g/kg), TP (g/kg), TK (g/kg), AN (mg/kg), AP (mg/kg) and AK (mg/kg) for three (0–10, 10–20 and 20–30 cm) soil depths between non-grazed and grazed alpine meadows..
Madrid (2003). Hordeum vulgare EDTA 0.5 g/kg Root part： Cu 15.0 mg/kg Zn 15.3 mg/kg Fe 1077.5 mg/kg Mn 53.1 mg/kg Aerial part： Cu 11.7 mg/kg Zn 25.0 mg/kg Fe 210 mg/kg Mn 86.3 mg/kg Cu 0.78 Fe 0.
Turgut (2004). Sunflower (Helianthus annuus) Citric acid 1 g/kg Root part： Cd0.09 mg/g Ni 0.01mg/g Cr 0.06 mg/g Aerial part： Cd 0.02 mg/g Ni 0.01 mg/g Cr 0.09 mg/g Cr 1.50 Ni 1.00 Cd 0.22 Citric acid 3 g/kg Root part： Cd 0.05 mg/g Ni 0.01 mg/g Cr 0.09 mg/g Aerial part： Cd 0.0025 mg/g Ni 0.03 mg/g Cr 0.07 mg/g Cr 0.78 Ni 3.00 Cd 0.05 EDTA 0.1 g/kg Root part： Cd 0.09 mg/g Ni 0.01 mg/g Cr 0.06 mg/g Aerial part： Cd 0.125 mg/g Ni 0.01 mg/g Cr 0.07 mg/g Cr 1.17 Ni 1.00 Cd 1.39 EDTA 0.3 g/kg Root part： Cd 0.22 mg/g Cd 0.01 mg/g Cr 0.11 mg/g Aerial part： Cd 0.015 mg/g Ni 0.17 mg/g Cr 1.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

T. Y. Yeh. 2014. \u201cA Sediment Phytoattenuation Evaluation by Four Sessions of Vetiver Planting and Harvesting\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural GJRE-E Volume 14 (GJRE Volume 14 Issue E6): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJRE Volume 14 Issue E6
Pg. 21- 31

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

Cu Heavy metal phytoattenuation vetiver Zn

Submission ReceivedDecember 6, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 8, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 142

Country: Taiwan

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - E: Civil & Structural

Authors: T. Y. Yeh, C L Lin (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 194

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4435

Total Downloads (simulated): 2271

Publish Date: 2014 12, Mon

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 66 views
Month 2: 29 views
Month 3: 22 views
Month 4: 58 views
Month 5: 37 views
Month 6: 32 views
Month 7: 36 views
Month 8: 55 views
Month 9: 28 views
Month 10: 33 views
Month 11: 36 views
Month 12: 15 views
Month 13: 41 views
Month 14: 29 views
Month 15: 34 views
Month 16: 27 views
Month 17: 21 views
Month 18: 42 views
Month 19: 28 views
Month 20: 35 views
Month 21: 23 views
Month 22: 33 views
Month 23: 45 views
Month 24: 18 views
Month 25: 20 views
Month 26: 27 views
Month 27: 16 views
Month 28: 40 views
Month 29: 27 views
Month 30: 33 views
Month 31: 39 views
Month 32: 18 views
Month 33: 27 views
Month 34: 46 views
Month 35: 29 views
Month 36: 29 views
Month 37: 32 views
Month 38: 28 views
Month 39: 38 views
Month 40: 33 views
Month 41: 19 views
Month 42: 19 views
Month 43: 26 views
Month 44: 35 views
Month 45: 43 views
Month 46: 46 views
Month 47: 41 views
Month 48: 35 views
Month 49: 25 views
Month 50: 16 views
Month 51: 26 views
Month 52: 11 views
Month 53: 36 views
Month 54: 45 views
Month 55: 23 views
Month 56: 17 views
Month 57: 39 views
Month 58: 22 views
Month 59: 42 views
Month 60: 37 views
Month 61: 35 views
Month 62: 29 views
Month 63: 23 views
Month 64: 32 views
Month 65: 24 views
Month 66: 41 views
Month 67: 41 views
Month 68: 32 views
Month 69: 37 views
Month 70: 33 views
Month 71: 15 views
Month 72: 30 views
Month 73: 24 views
Month 74: 37 views
Month 75: 32 views
Month 76: 21 views
Month 77: 23 views
Month 78: 40 views
Month 79: 23 views
Month 80: 35 views
Month 81: 18 views
Month 82: 30 views
Month 83: 23 views
Month 84: 23 views
Month 85: 43 views
Month 86: 33 views
Month 87: 43 views
Month 88: 26 views
Month 89: 31 views
Month 90: 39 views
Month 91: 45 views
Month 92: 15 views
Month 93: 43 views
Month 94: 33 views
Month 95: 36 views
Month 96: 41 views
Month 97: 37 views
Month 98: 24 views
Month 99: 23 views
Month 100: 20 views
Month 101: 21 views
Month 102: 29 views
Month 103: 48 views
Month 104: 32 views
Month 105: 16 views
Month 106: 26 views
Month 107: 21 views
Month 108: 14 views
Month 109: 32 views
Month 110: 39 views
Month 111: 45 views
Month 112: 34 views
Month 113: 28 views
Month 114: 28 views
Month 115: 33 views
Month 116: 29 views
Month 117: 19 views
Month 118: 27 views
Month 119: 32 views
Month 120: 30 views
Month 121: 38 views
Month 122: 26 views
Month 123: 36 views
Month 124: 36 views
Month 125: 35 views
Month 126: 37 views
Month 127: 42 views
Month 128: 44 views
Month 129: 25 views
Month 130: 26 views
Month 131: 17 views
Month 132: 20 views
Month 133: 30 views
Month 134: 45 views
Month 135: 30 views
Month 136: 35 views
Month 137: 41 views

Total Views: 4435

Total Downloads: 2271

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]