A Short Satisfaction Questionnaire for an Independent Medical Examination: A pilot study.

Article ID

8AF82

High-quality ALT text: Medical satisfaction survey for independent medical examiners, emphasizing patient feedback and reliability.

A Short Satisfaction Questionnaire for an Independent Medical Examination: A pilot study.

Ian Bruce McPhee
Ian Bruce McPhee
DOI

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess client satisfaction with an Independent Medical Examination (IME). Design: The questionnaire (IMESQ) was developed as a short assessment of six items covering six domains relevant to an IME. The sample was tested for internal consistency reliability. Construct validity of the questionnaire was via a parallel measurement analysis. Participants: Data were collected from 76 adult respondents (male = 44.7 %); mean age (42.9 ± 13.3 years). Results: The questionnaire had good correlation of paired items (range r= 0.55 to 0.80, M = 0.65). The Cronbach’s α value of the questionnaire was •91and the spit-halves reliability was .90 suggesting good internal consistency. There was strong correlation (rs =.82) with a numerical satisfaction scale (NSS). Compared with a Surrogate score calculated from the NSS, the intrarater reliability was high (ICC .75). A Bland-Altman analysis identified 14 Outliers who underrated or overrated the responses to the questionnaire.

A Short Satisfaction Questionnaire for an Independent Medical Examination: A pilot study.

Objective: This study was conducted to develop and validate a questionnaire to assess client satisfaction with an Independent Medical Examination (IME). Design: The questionnaire (IMESQ) was developed as a short assessment of six items covering six domains relevant to an IME. The sample was tested for internal consistency reliability. Construct validity of the questionnaire was via a parallel measurement analysis. Participants: Data were collected from 76 adult respondents (male = 44.7 %); mean age (42.9 ± 13.3 years). Results: The questionnaire had good correlation of paired items (range r= 0.55 to 0.80, M = 0.65). The Cronbach’s α value of the questionnaire was •91and the spit-halves reliability was .90 suggesting good internal consistency. There was strong correlation (rs =.82) with a numerical satisfaction scale (NSS). Compared with a Surrogate score calculated from the NSS, the intrarater reliability was high (ICC .75). A Bland-Altman analysis identified 14 Outliers who underrated or overrated the responses to the questionnaire.

Ian Bruce McPhee
Ian Bruce McPhee

No Figures found in article.

Ian Bruce McPhee. 2026. “. Global Journal of Medical Research – K: Interdisciplinary GJMR-K Volume 23 (GJMR Volume 23 Issue K4): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Classification
GJMR-K Classification: NLMC: W 84.1
Keywords
Article Matrices
Total Views: 1159
Total Downloads: 22
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

A Short Satisfaction Questionnaire for an Independent Medical Examination: A pilot study.

Ian Bruce McPhee
Ian Bruce McPhee

Research Journals