A Study of Automated Optical Inspection of Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests

1
Wen-Tung Hsu
Wen-Tung Hsu
2
Cheng-Ho Chen
Cheng-Ho Chen
1 Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital

Send Message

To: Author

GJRE Volume 20 Issue A1

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

B8142

A Study of Automated Optical Inspection of Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) is one of the most common tools for screening patients suspected of influenza infection. The principle is to detect the surface antigen of influenza virus with known antibodies, and then to interpret it with the naked eye in the form of immune chromatographic as says. It has the advantage of obtaining speedy results (10-30 minutes) and ease of operation (which can be interpreted with the naked eye).There is a variety of rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) available in the market, with different sensitivities and specificities depending on the design of the antibody location and reagent composition. Despite its advantages of speed and convenience, a high percentage of test results (20 to 50% or higher) do not correctly reflect the patient’s status. In addition to possible misses in the specimen collection process that will affect the tests; the naked eye may not be able to distinguish the unapparent results and cause false negatives. At the same time, because a healthcare worker may not accurately grasp the time of interpretation, false positives can also occur due to excessive test times. To minimize incorrect diagnoses, we propose an interpretation system using machine vision. The system replaces the function of a healthcare worker by a camera and computer. The camera captures the image of the test piece then sent it to the computer for processing and identification; the result can provide the medical staff reference.

14 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Andrea Cruz,Gail Demmler-Harrison,A Caviness,Gregory Buffone,Paula Revell (2010). Performance of a Rapid Influenza Test in Children During the H1N1 2009 Influenza A Outbreak.
  2. Scott Harper,John Bradley,Janet Englund,Thomas File,Stefan Gravenstein,Frederick Hayden,Allison Mcgeer,Kathleen Neuzil,Andrew Pavia,Michael Tapper,Timothy Uyeki,Richard Zimmerman (2009). Seasonal Influenza in Adults and Children—Diagnosis, Treatment, Chemoprophylaxis, and Institutional Outbreak Management: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
  3. C Chartrand,M Leeflang,J Minion,T Brewer,M Pai (2012). Accuracy of rapid influenza diagnostic tests: A meta-analysis.
  4. Jan Drexler,Angelika Helmer,Heike Kirberg,Ulrike Reber,Marcus Panning,Marcel Müller,Katja Höfling,Bertfried Matz,Christian Drosten,Anna Eis-Hübinger (2009). Poor Clinical Sensitivity of Rapid Antigen Test for Influenza A Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Virus.
  5. Aubree Gordon,Elsa Videa,Saira Saborío,Roger López,Guillermina Kuan,Angel Balmaseda,Eva Harris (2010). Diagnostic Accuracy of a Rapid Influenza Test for Pandemic Influenza A H1N1.
  6. Aubree Gordon,Elsa Videa,Saira Saborio,Roger López,Guillermina Kuan,Arthur Reingold,Angel Balmaseda,Eva Harris (2009). Performance of an Influenza Rapid Test in Children in a Primary Healthcare Setting in Nicaragua.
  7. Janice Louie,Hugo Guevara,Erica Boston,Melissa Dahlke,Maria Nevarez,Tong Kong,Robert Schechter,Carol Glaser,David Schnurr (2010). Rapid Influenza Antigen Test for Diagnosis of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009.
  8. Bram Diederen,Dick Veenendaal,Ruud Jansen,Bjorn Herpers,Eric Ligtvoet,Ed Ijzerman (2010). Rapid Antigen Test for Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Virus.
  9. Christine Ginocchio,Frank Zhang,Ryhana Manji,Suman Arora,Mark Bornfreund,Leon Falk,Madhavi Lotlikar,Margaret Kowerska,George Becker,Diamanto Korologos,Marcella De Geronimo,James Crawford (2009). Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak.
  10. J Crawford,R Stallone,F Zhang,M Gerolimatos,D Korologos,C Sweetapple,M De Geronimo,Y Dlugacz,D Armellino,C Ginocchio (2010). Laboratory surge response to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 outbreak.
  11. Cdc (2009). Evaluation of rapid influenza diagnostic tests for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) Virus-United States, 2009.
  12. Dennis Faix,Sterling Sherman,Steven Waterman (2009). Rapid-Test Sensitivity for Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in Humans.
  13. James Crawford,Robert Stallone,Fan Zhang,Mary Gerolimatos,Diamanto Korologos,Carolyn Sweetapple,Marcella De Geronimo,Yosef Dlugacz,Donna Armellino,Christine Ginocchio (2010). Laboratory Surge Response to Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Outbreak, New York City Metropolitan Area, USA.
  14. David Andresen,Alison Kesson (2010). High Sensitivity of a Rapid Immunochromatographic Test for Detection of Influenza A Virus 2009 H1N1 in Nasopharyngeal Aspirates from Young Children.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Wen-Tung Hsu. 2020. \u201cA Study of Automated Optical Inspection of Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - A : Mechanical & Mechanics GJRE-A Volume 20 (GJRE Volume 20 Issue A1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords
Classification
GJRE-A Classification: FOR Code: 091399
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 10, 2020

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2228
Total Downloads: 1101
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Rapid influenza diagnostic test (RIDT) is one of the most common tools for screening patients suspected of influenza infection. The principle is to detect the surface antigen of influenza virus with known antibodies, and then to interpret it with the naked eye in the form of immune chromatographic as says. It has the advantage of obtaining speedy results (10-30 minutes) and ease of operation (which can be interpreted with the naked eye).There is a variety of rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) available in the market, with different sensitivities and specificities depending on the design of the antibody location and reagent composition. Despite its advantages of speed and convenience, a high percentage of test results (20 to 50% or higher) do not correctly reflect the patient’s status. In addition to possible misses in the specimen collection process that will affect the tests; the naked eye may not be able to distinguish the unapparent results and cause false negatives. At the same time, because a healthcare worker may not accurately grasp the time of interpretation, false positives can also occur due to excessive test times. To minimize incorrect diagnoses, we propose an interpretation system using machine vision. The system replaces the function of a healthcare worker by a camera and computer. The camera captures the image of the test piece then sent it to the computer for processing and identification; the result can provide the medical staff reference.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

A Study of Automated Optical Inspection of Rapid Influenza Diagnostic Tests

Wen-Tung Hsu
Wen-Tung Hsu Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital
Cheng-Ho Chen
Cheng-Ho Chen

Research Journals