A Study on Resource use Efficiency of Agricultural Input Factors with Reference to Farm Size in Three Revenue Mandals of Nellore District : Andhra Pradesh

A Study on Resource use Efficiency of Agricultural Input Factors with Reference to Farm Size in Three Revenue Mandals of Nellore District : Andhra Pradesh

Dr. E. Lokanadha Reddy

Contact

Dr. D. Radhakrishna Reddy

Contact

Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Anantapur

A Study on Resource use Efficiency of Agricultural Input Factors with Reference to Farm Size in Three Revenue Mandals of Nellore District : Andhra Pradesh

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

4W79H

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Farm-size is of an extreme interest in agriculture. This has been much debated over what may be appropriate size of the farm because the size of the operating unit, as in the case of manufacturing industries, decisively affects the income from agriculture. Since the amount of income is dependent on the size of the farm, preponderance in small and tiny holdings is mainly responsible poor peasantry in the third world countries. Even where there is no cost advantage or disadvantage for farms of various sizes, small farms will have, under usual price relationship, lower incomes and savings than large farms. Thus, size of farms is a vital element in determining the earning capacity of the farmer as well as the efficiency of a farming unit. Hence the present study aims to analyse the resource use efficiency of input factors in different size-level farms based on entire sample of Farms in three revenue mandals of Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh. Data was collected for the variables with the help of survey method through personal interviews of the farmers selected through mixed sampling.

References

28 Cites in Article

Reference Format

P Badal,R Singh (2001). Factors Affecting Adoption of Modern Maize Cultivars In Bihar.
K Basak,B Choudhary (1954). Studies in the Economics of Farm Management in West Bengal.
R Bhatia,V Dutta (1987). Impact of Energy use on Employment in Agriculture.
T Chaudhari (1962). Optimum combination of comparative crops in the intensive cultivation scheme area Delhi.
Dehnarayan Sarker,Sudpita,De (2004). High Technical Efficiency of Farms in two Different Agricultural Lands: A Study under Determine Production Frontier Approach.
Y Eswara Prasad,C Srirama Murthy,G Satyanarayana,K Chennarayudu,Lalith Acoth (1988). An Econometric Analysis of Cotton Production in Guntur District of Andhra Pradesh.
S Goyal (2003). Supply Response and Input Demand on Paddy Farms in Haryana, India -A Panel Data Analysis.
C Hanumantha Rao (1965). Agricultural Production Functions -Costs and Returns.
W Hopper (1965). Allocation Efficiency in a Traditional Indian Agriculture.
W Jain (1985). Effects of Technological and Institutional Factors on Income Distribution in Farm Sector of Bangladesh.
P Mathur (1960). Studies in the Economics of Farm Management in Madya Pradesh.
G Mythili,K Shanmugam (2000). Technical Efficiency of Rice Growers in Tamilnadu: A Study Based on Panel Data.
A Parikh (1996). PROGRAMME OF CONFERENCE, NOTTINGHAM: APRIL 1980.
V Prasad (1973). Resource use Efficiency and level of production in Multiple cropping in Farrukhabad District in U.P. An un Published.
Pritam Singh (1970). Socio-Economic Profile of Farm Households in Cotton Belt of Rural Punjab.
D Radhakrishna (1962). Shares of Fixed Factors of Production in the Net Earnings from Agriculture in West Godavari District.
Rajkrishna (1964). Some Production Functions for Punjab.
Rajvir Singh,R Patel (1973). Returns to Scale Farm and Productivity in Meerut District.
A Reddy,C Sen (2004). Technical Inefficiency in Rice Production and its Relationship with Farm-Specific Socio-Economic Characteristics.
A Reddy,C Sen (2004). Technical Inefficiency in Wheat Production - A Socioeconomic Analysis.
M Robellow,D Desai (1966). A Study of Efficiency of Production of Wheat in Kanjhawala Block.
S Shan (1969). A Socio-Economic Study of progressive and less progressive Farms in Varanasi District.
Jasmeet Kaur,Ankit Yadav,Harbans Lal,K Sharma,Rakesh Singh (2000). ASSESSING FARM INVENTORIES AND LAND UTILIZATION FOR ORGANIC CROP CULTIVATION IN THE LOW HILL REGION OF HIMACHAL PRADESH INDIA.
L Singh,L Pandey (1971). Resource Use Efficiency in a Dry Farming Area of Banda District of Utter Pradesh.
M Srinivasa Gowda,Basavaraj Bankar,K Basvaraj,L Hugar (1988). Productivity Difference between Small and Large Farms -An Econometric Evidence.
(1990). ADT 40, A HIGE YIELDING RICE VARIETY FOR WATER-LOGGED/ FLASH FLOOD SITUATION OF TAMIL NADU.
P Venkatesam,M Naidu,V Venkateswarlu (1988). Resource Use Efficiency on Maize Farms in Karimnagar District of Andhra Pradesh.
R Yadav,A Gangwar (1986). Economics of Technological Change in Rice Production.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. E. Lokanadha Reddy. 2014. \u201cA Study on Resource use Efficiency of Agricultural Input Factors with Reference to Farm Size in Three Revenue Mandals of Nellore District : Andhra Pradesh\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - E: Marketing GJMBR-E Volume 14 (GJMBR Volume 14 Issue E5).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 14 Issue E5

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

efficiency geometric mean Keywords: resourceuse marginal cost marginal value product regression co-efficient

Submission ReceivedDecember 14, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

October 8, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 112

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Management and Business Research - E: Marketing

Authors: Dr. E. Lokanadha Reddy, Dr. D. Radhakrishna Reddy (PhD/Dr. count: 2)

View Count (all-time): 171

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4427

Total Downloads (simulated): 2195

Publish Date: 2014 10, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 23 views
Month 2: 24 views
Month 3: 39 views
Month 4: 45 views
Month 5: 33 views
Month 6: 35 views
Month 7: 42 views
Month 8: 42 views
Month 9: 59 views
Month 10: 33 views
Month 11: 40 views
Month 12: 40 views
Month 13: 12 views
Month 14: 12 views
Month 15: 29 views
Month 16: 44 views
Month 17: 36 views
Month 18: 12 views
Month 19: 37 views
Month 20: 30 views
Month 21: 32 views
Month 22: 44 views
Month 23: 42 views
Month 24: 31 views
Month 25: 16 views
Month 26: 24 views
Month 27: 24 views
Month 28: 31 views
Month 29: 46 views
Month 30: 27 views
Month 31: 11 views
Month 32: 35 views
Month 33: 31 views
Month 34: 25 views
Month 35: 37 views
Month 36: 29 views
Month 37: 30 views
Month 38: 33 views
Month 39: 27 views
Month 40: 12 views
Month 41: 28 views
Month 42: 28 views
Month 43: 37 views
Month 44: 34 views
Month 45: 29 views
Month 46: 33 views
Month 47: 26 views
Month 48: 41 views
Month 49: 31 views
Month 50: 39 views
Month 51: 32 views
Month 52: 27 views
Month 53: 27 views
Month 54: 29 views
Month 55: 48 views
Month 56: 46 views
Month 57: 21 views
Month 58: 26 views
Month 59: 32 views
Month 60: 21 views
Month 61: 19 views
Month 62: 41 views
Month 63: 35 views
Month 64: 36 views
Month 65: 43 views
Month 66: 38 views
Month 67: 30 views
Month 68: 29 views
Month 69: 30 views
Month 70: 21 views
Month 71: 39 views
Month 72: 23 views
Month 73: 14 views
Month 74: 38 views
Month 75: 26 views
Month 76: 37 views
Month 77: 23 views
Month 78: 33 views
Month 79: 23 views
Month 80: 36 views
Month 81: 27 views
Month 82: 42 views
Month 83: 23 views
Month 84: 27 views
Month 85: 28 views
Month 86: 27 views
Month 87: 39 views
Month 88: 43 views
Month 89: 43 views
Month 90: 34 views
Month 91: 40 views
Month 92: 36 views
Month 93: 23 views
Month 94: 19 views
Month 95: 25 views
Month 96: 37 views
Month 97: 42 views
Month 98: 36 views
Month 99: 20 views
Month 100: 28 views
Month 101: 35 views
Month 102: 28 views
Month 103: 17 views
Month 104: 27 views
Month 105: 28 views
Month 106: 36 views
Month 107: 20 views
Month 108: 18 views
Month 109: 22 views
Month 110: 37 views
Month 111: 15 views
Month 112: 19 views
Month 113: 38 views
Month 114: 30 views
Month 115: 17 views
Month 116: 28 views
Month 117: 27 views
Month 118: 28 views
Month 119: 44 views
Month 120: 24 views
Month 121: 36 views
Month 122: 38 views
Month 123: 42 views
Month 124: 28 views
Month 125: 27 views
Month 126: 30 views
Month 127: 39 views
Month 128: 30 views
Month 129: 32 views
Month 130: 16 views
Month 131: 23 views
Month 132: 24 views
Month 133: 40 views
Month 134: 25 views
Month 135: 33 views
Month 136: 25 views
Month 137: 46 views
Month 138: 45 views
Month 139: 42 views
Month 140: 17 views

Total Views: 4427

Total Downloads: 2195

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]