Loading menu…

A Time Series Analysis of Forieng Aid and Income Inequality in Pakistan

Sharafat Ali
Sharafat Ali § M. Phil. PhD
Najid Ahmad
Najid Ahmad ‡ M.Sc Economics
§ Allama Iqbal Open University Islamabad
‡ Bahaudin Zakariya University Multan, Bahadur Campus ...

Send Message

To: Author

A Time Series Analysis of Forieng Aid and Income Inequality in Pakistan

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

J865O

A Time Series Analysis of Forieng Aid and Income Inequality in Pakistan Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Pakistan economy is one those economies that has received a huge amount of foreign aid. Foreign aid has been considered to help capital-deficient economies to fulfill the desired levels of finances to generate growth, increase employment and income, and furthermore, it helps to alleviate poverty levels in the recipient economies. Present study focuses on the analysis of impact of foreign aid on income inequality in Pakistan. Since time series data is used for the analysis so the ADF and Phillip-Perron unit root test are applied to find out each of the time series to be stationary at its first difference. Johansen contegration test and vector error correction models are employed to examine the long run and short run impacts of growth, foreign aid, foreign direct investment, and labor force participation rate on income inequality, respectively. The cointegration test results confirm negative impact of economic growth on income inequality whereas foreign aid, foreign direct investment and labor force participation rate are concluded to have inequality increasing impacts. The results are statistically significant. Vector error correction model results showed long run causality as the coefficient of error correction term has the negative and significant coefficient. The Engle-Granger causality test showed bidirectional causality between aid and growth. The study also draws some conclusions and policy recommendations.

References

48 Cites in Article
  1. 1. S. Ali (1993). Management of Foreign Debt and Dependency in Pakistan. Unpublished M. Phil Thesis
  2. 2. E. Alvi,A. Senbeta (2011). DOES FOREIGN AID REDUCE POVERTY?. Journal of International Development, 68-98.
  3. 3. Abhijit Banerjee,Esther Duflo (2003). Inequality and Growth: What Can the Data Say?. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(3), 267-299.
  4. 4. P. Boone (1994). The Impact of Foreign Aid on Savings and Growth. Center for Economic Performance, Working Paper No. 1265: London
  5. 5. Craig Burnside,David Dollar (2000). Aid, Policies, and Growth. American Economic Review, 90(4), 847-868.
  6. 6. H. Chenery,A. Strout (1966). Foreign Assistance and Economic Development. American Economic Review, 56, 679-733.
  7. 7. Salim Chishti,M. Hasan (1992). Foreign Aid, Defence Expenditure and Public Investment in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 31(4), 895-908.
  8. 8. Paul Collier,David Dollar (2002). Aid allocation and poverty reduction. European Economic Review, 46(8), 1475-1500.
  9. 9. David Dickey,Wayne Fuller (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427-431.
  10. 10. A. Dreher,P. Nunnenkamp,R. Theile (2006). Does Aid for Education Educate Children? Evidence from Panel Data.
  11. 11. William Easterly (1999). The ghost of financing gap: testing the growth model used in the international financial institutions. Journal of Development Economics, 60(2), 423-438.
  12. 12. Robert Engle,C. Granger (1987). Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251.
  13. 13. Karuna Gomanee,Oliver Morrissey,Paul Mosley,Arjan Verschoor (2005). Aid, Government Expenditure, and Aggregate Welfare. World Development, 33(3), 355-370.
  14. 14. Rukmani Gounder (2001). Aid-growth nexus: empirical evidence from Fiji. Applied Economics, 33(8), 1009-1019.
  15. 15. C. Granger (1986). DEVELOPMENTS IN THE STUDY OF COINTEGRATED ECONOMIC VARIABLES. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 48(3), 213-228.
  16. 16. K. Griffin,J. Enos (1970). Foreign Assistance: Objectives and Consequences. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 18(3), 313-327.
  17. 17. Kanhaya Gupta (1975). FOREIGN CAPITAL INFLOWS, DEPENDENCY BURDEN, AND SAVING RATES IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A SIMULTANEOUS EQUATION MODEL. Kyklos, 28(2), 358-374.
  18. 18. K. Gyimah-Brempong,E. Asiedu (2008). Aid and Human Capital Formation: Some Evidence. Paper presented at African Developing Bank/United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Conference on Globalization, Institutions and Economic Development in Africa
  19. 19. Henrik Hansen,Finn Tarp (2001). Aid effectiveness disputed. Journal of International Development, 12(3), 375-398.
  20. 20. A. Hatemi-J,M. Irandoust (2005). Foreign Aid and Economic Growth: New Evidence from Panel Cointegration. Journal of Economic Development, 30, 71-80.
  21. 21. I. Hussain (1999). Pakistan the Economy of an Elitist State.
  22. 22. M. Ishfaq,E. Ahmed (2005). Aid Effectiveness: The Case of Pakistan. The Middle East Business and Economic Review, 17(2
  23. 23. Muhammad Javed,Abdul Qayyum (2011). Foreign Aid and Growth Nexus in Pakistan: The Role of Macroeconomic Policies. PIDE Working Paper No
  24. 24. Søren Johansen (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254.
  25. 25. S. Johansen,K. Juselius (1990). MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE ON COINTEGRATION — WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE DEMAND FOR MONEY. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, 170-20.
  26. 26. Simon Kuznets (1955). Economic Growth and Income Inequality. American Economic Review, 45, 1-28.
  27. 27. Ugo Panizza (2002). Income Inequality and Economic Growth: Evidence from American Data. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(1), 25-41.
  28. 28. Robert Lensink,Oliver Morrissey (2000). Aid instability as a measure of uncertainty and the positive impact of aid on growth. Journal of Development Studies, 36(3), 31-49.
  29. 29. V. Levy (1984). The Saving Gap and the Productivity of Foreign Aid to a Developing Economy: Egypt. Journal of Development Areas, 78, 21-43.
  30. 30. T. Lloyd,O. Morrissey,R. Osei (2001). Aid, Exports and Growth in Ghana.
  31. 31. G. Mavrotas (2002). Aid and Growth in India: Some Evidence from Disaggregated Aid Data. South Asia Economic Journal, 3(1), 19-49.
  32. 32. Katharina Michaelowa,A. Weber (2006). Aid Effectiveness Reconsidered: Panel Data Evidence for the Education Sector.
  33. 33. P. Mishra,D. Newhouse (2007). Health Aid and Infant Mortality. IMF Working Paper No. WP/07/100. IMF: Washington D. C
  34. 34. P. Mo (2000). Income Inequality and Economic Growth. Kyklos, 53, 293-316.
  35. 35. Paul Mosley (1980). AID, SAVINGS AND GROWTH REVISITED. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 42(2), 79-95.
  36. 36. Stéphane Pallage,Michel Robe (2001). Foreign Aid and the Business Cycle. Review of International Economics, 9(4), 641-672.
  37. 37. Gustav Papanek (1973). Aid, Foreign Private Investment, Savings, and Growth in Less Developed Countries. Journal of Political Economy, 81(1), 120-130.
  38. 38. Torsten Persson,Guido Tabellini (1994). Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence. American Economic Review, 84, 600-621.
  39. 39. Peter Phillips,Pierre Perron (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
  40. 40. W. Rowstow (1960). The Stages of Economic Growth.
  41. 41. T. Shabbir,A. Mahmood (1992). The Effects of Foreign Private Investment on Economic Growth in Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 31(4), 831-862.
  42. 42. M. Sheikh,M. Faridi,K. Tariq (2010). Domestic Debt and Economic Growth in Pakistan: An Empirical Analysis. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 30(2), 373-387.
  43. 43. Ram Singh (1985). State Intervention, Foreign Economic Aid, Savings and Growth in LDCs: Some Recent Evidence. Kyklos, 38(2), 216-232.
  44. 44. Te Velde,W. (2003). Foreign Direct Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean 2003.
  45. 45. M. Todaro,S. Smith (2005). Economic Development. Pearson Education limited
  46. 46. A. Verschoor,A. Kalwij (2006). Aid, social policies and pro‐poor growth. Journal of International Development, 18(4), 519-531.
  47. 47. A. Waterson (1965). Developing Planning: Lessons of Experience. Baltimore
  48. 48. T. Weisskoff (1972). The impact of foreign capital inflow on domestic savings in underdeveloped countries. Journal of International Economics, 2(1), 25-38.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Sharafat Ali, Najid Ahmad. 2013. "A Time Series Analysis of Forieng Aid and Income Inequality in Pakistan". Global Journal of Management and Business Research - B: Economic & Commerce GJMBR-B Volume 13 (GJMBR Volume 13 Issue 30 (B5)).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-B Classification JEL Code: E01
Version of record
v1.2

Issue date
September 2, 2013

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1.8K
Total Downloads: 114
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

A Time Series Analysis of Forieng Aid and Income Inequality in Pakistan

Najid Ahmad
Najid Ahmad
Sharafat Ali
Sharafat Ali