A Unified Approach for Determining Optical and Quantum Multilayer Thin Film Reflectance and Transmittance

§ San Diego State University San Diego State University

Send Message

To: Author

A Unified Approach for Determining Optical and Quantum Multilayer Thin Film Reflectance and Transmittance

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SFRE3O0G

A Unified Approach for Determining Optical and Quantum Multilayer Thin Film Reflectance and Transmittance Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

Abstract

In this paper we present a unified approach for determining the reflectance and transmittance properties of single-layer and multilayer optical and quantum thin-film structures using a unified set of equations based on the similarity of classical Maxwell and newly formulated relativistic Dirac vector field equations. A review of these field equations and the corresponding wave equations is presented. Electromagnetic plane-wave and quantum mechanical matterwave solutions that satisfy these equations and their properties are reviewed. Single-layer optical and quantum thin film analyses lead to a unified set of analytical equations that predict their reflectance and transmittance characteristics. A unified theory conversion table describes how to convert classical electrodynamic quantities into relativistic quantum mechanical quantities to use a set of unified equations. The unified approach was extended to multilayer optical and quantum mechanical thin-film structures. Numerical results are presented for single-layer and multilayer optical and quantum thin film architectures. MATLAB software was employed for computations and graphics.

I. INTRODUCTION

This study presents a unified approach for predicting the reflectance R and transmittance T properties of multilayer optical thin films and multilayer quantum well-and-barrier structures using the same unified set of equations. Replacing certain classical electrodynamic quantities in these equations with certain relativistic quantum-mechanical quantities is required in this unified approach. See Table (1). The underlying key equations necessary for deriving these unified sets of equations are the Maxwell vector field [1] and newly developed relativistic Dirac vector field equations [2] and [3].

Figure 1: Multilayer Thin Film Structure Consisting of N Thin Films

Figure 1 depicts an incident wave impinging on a multilayer thin-film structure at normal incidence. This gives rise to both a reflected wave and a transmitted wave. For the optical thin-film case, a photon and its associated electromagnetic wave serve the purpose. For the quantum thin-film case, an electron and its associated matter wave are the particle and wave of interest. R and T represent the probabilities a particle will be either reflected or transmitted. Assuming no absorption takes place within the thin film, then R + T = 1 .

The emphasis of this study was on the analysis of a single thin film with parallel planar boundaries. The results for this case can then be easily generalized to handle multilayer thin-film structures consisting of N thin films. For a single optical thin film, the permittivity ϵ , permeability μ and thickness w are important properties of interest. For a single quantum thin film, the thickness w and potential energy U of electrons moving within the thin film are important quantities of interest.

Several figures depicting thin-film structures are included in this study: Multilayer Thin Film Structure Consisting of N Thin Films (1), Single Optical Thin Film (2), Single Quantum Thin Film (3), and Multilayer Thin Film Structure (6).

Reflectance and transmittance results are presented for a number of optical and quantum-mechanical single and multilayer thin-film structures. These include a 1-Layer Dielectric Thin Film Structure (4), 1-Layer Thin Film Quantum Barrier (5), 11-Layer High-Reflectance Mirror Structure (7), 15-Layer Long-Wave Band-Pass Optical Filter (8), 15-Layer Short-Wave Band-Pass Optical Filter (9), 15-Layer Narrow Band-Pass Optical Filter (10), 11-Layer Periodic Quantum Well-and-Barrier Structure (11), 3-Layer Well-and-Barrier Structure (12), 21-Layer Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Structure (13), and 3-Layer Nuclear Potential Well-and-Barrier Structure (14).

II. REVIEW OF THE VECTOR FIELD EQUATIONS

a) Maxwell Vector Field Equations

In our investigation of an electromagnetic wave propagating through a single dielectric optical thin film, we assumed that the dielectric was Class A. Class A dielectrics are linear, homogeneous, and isotropic dielectrics. The dielectric is characterized by a scalar permittivity ϵ and a scalar permeability μ . The Maxwell vector field equations in Gaussian units [1] for a dielectric material are given by

( 1 ) E = 0
( 2 ) H = 0
( 3 ) × E + μ c t H = 0
( 4 ) × H ϵ c t E = 0

E = ( E 1 E 2 E 3 ) represents the electric field vector and H = ( H 1 H 2 H 3 ) is the magnetic field vector. The symbol c represents the speed of light in free space.

b) Dirac Vector Field Equations

In our investigation of a quantum mechanical matter wave propagating through a single quantum thin film, relativistic Dirac vector field equations played an important role. In the Gaussian units references [2] and [3], these equations are given by

( 5 ) U = 0
L = 0
( 7 ) × U + 1 c t L + i κ L = 0
( 8 ) × L 1 c t U + i κ U = 0

U = ( U 1 U 2 U 3 ) is defined as the upper field vector and L = ( L 1 L 2 L 3 ) is defined as the lower field vector. The imaginary quantity i represents the square root of minus one. The constant κ is defined as follows:

( 9 ) κ m o c = m o c 2 c = E o c .

Here m o represents the rest mass of the matter wave particle, E o its rest mass energy and is the reduced Planck's constant equal to Planck's constant h divided by 2 π . Note the similarity between the Maxwell and Dirac vector field equations.

III. REVIEW OF THE WAVE EQUATIONS

a) Electromagnetic Wave Equations

From the Maxwell vector field equations, the following pair of electromagnetic wave equations for electric field E and magnetic field H can be easily obtained:

( 10 ) 2 E 1 v 2 2 t 2 E = 0
( 11 ) 2 H 1 v 2 2 t 2 H = 0.

The quantity v = c / n represents the wave propagation speed through a dielectric medium. The refractive index n of the dielectric material is defined as follows:

( 12 ) n μ ϵ .

b) Quantum Mechanical Wave Equations

Similarly, from the Dirac vector field equations, the following pair of quantum mechanical wave equations for the upper field U and lower field L can be obtained.

( 13 ) 2 U 1 c 2 2 t 2 U = κ 2 U
( 14 ) 2 L 1 c 2 2 t 2 L = κ 2 L

These two quantum mechanical vector wave equations have the same form as the quantum mechanical Klein-Gordon equation.

IV. REVIEW OF THE PLANE WAVE SOLUTIONS

a) Electromagnetic Plane Wave Solutions

To determine the reflection and transmission characteristics of a single optical thin film as a function of the wavelength λ of the incident electromagnetic wave, monochromatic plane-wave solutions [1] satisfying the Maxwell vector field equations and corresponding wave equations were employed:

E = E o exp { i ( k r ω t ) } H = H o exp { i ( k r ω t ) } .

The quantities E o and H o represent the maximum amplitude electric and magnetic field vectors, respectively; k and ω are the wave vector and angular frequency of the electromagnetic wave, respectively; r and t represent the position vector and instantaneous time, respectively. The magnitude of the wave vector k is known as the wavenumber k . Substituting equations (15) back into the Maxwell vector field equations and corresponding wave equations yields the following set of equations:

( 16 ) k E 0 = 0 k H 0 = 0
( 17 ) k × E 0 = + μ c ω H 0 k × H 0 = ϵ c ω E 0

and

( 18 ) k 2 = ω 2 / c 2 .

b) Quantum Mechanical Plane Wave Solutions

Similarly, plane-wave solutions satisfying the Dirac vector field equations and the corresponding wave equations were employed to determine the reflection and transmission properties of a single quantum thin film as a function of the kinetic energy K of the incident matter wave particle. That is

U = U o exp { i ( p r E t ) / } L = L o exp { i ( p r E t ) / } .

The quantities U o and L o represent the maximum amplitudes of the upper and lower field vectors, respectively, and p and E correspond to the linear momentum and total energy of the matter-wave particle, respectively. Substituting Equation (19) back into the Dirac vector field equations and corresponding wave equations yields the following set of equations:

( 20 ) p c U o = 0 p c L o = 0
( 21 ) p c × U o = + E o ( γ 1 ) L o p c × L o = E o ( γ + 1 ) U o

and

( 22 ) E 2 = E o 2 + p 2 c 2 .

V. REVIEW OF THE PLANE WAVE PROPERTIES

a) Electromagnetic Plane Wave Properties

From equations (16) and (17), we find that the vectors E o , H o , and k are mutually perpendicular. That is

k E o E o H o k H o

This electromagnetic wave is transverse. We also obtained important results for wave amplitudes.

( 23 ) μ H o = ϵ E o

or equivalently

( 24 ) H o = Y E o E o = Z H o

where the quantities Y and Z are the admittance and impedance of the dielectric material, respectively, defined by

( 25 ) Y ϵ / μ Z μ / ϵ .

b) Quantum Mechanical Plane Wave Properties

From equations (20) and (21), we find that vectors U o , L o , and pc are mutually perpendicular. That is

p c U o U o L o p c L o

This quantum-mechanical matter wave is transverse in nature. We also obtained important results for the wave amplitudes.

( 26 ) γ + 1 U o = γ 1 L o .

From the special theory of relativity [4], the quantity γ in equations (21) and (26) is known as the Lorentz factor. It is related to the speed v of a relativistic moving particle by the following equation:

( 27 ) γ = 1 ( 1 β 2 ) where β = v / c .

β is known as the speed parameter.

VI. THIN FILM STRUCTURES

a) Single Optical Thin Film

Figure (2) depicts a single optical thin film surrounded by free space with parallel planar surfaces. The thin film has thickness w and is composed of a Class A dielectric material with permittivity ϵ and permeability μ . Other quantities useful for characterizing thin films are the index of refraction n , admittance Y and impedance Z , where

( 28 ) n = μ ϵ Y = ϵ / μ Z = μ / ϵ .

Notably, the permittivity and permeability of free space are both equal to unity when the Gaussian units are used.

Figure 2: Single Optical Thin Film
Figure 2: Single Optical Thin Film

An incident electromagnetic wave, with wavelength λ , strikes the optical thin film at normal incidence, giving rise to both reflected and transmitted waves. Our primary goal is to determine mathematical formulae for predicting the reflectance R and transmittance T of the optical thin film as a function of the wavelength λ and quantities w , n , Y and Z . The fundamental equations used in the mathematical analysis are the Maxwell vector field equations.

b) Single Quantum Thin Film

Figure (3) depicts a single quantum thin film surrounded by free space with parallel planar surfaces. The only two quantities of interest in describing a quantum thin film are its thickness w and the electrical potential V externally applied to the thin film. The potential energy U , of an electron in the presence of an electrical potential V , is given by U = e V , where e is the elementary charge.

Figure 3: Single Quantum Thin Film
Figure 3: Single Quantum Thin Film

An incident quantum mechanical matter wave particle, having kinetic energy K , strikes the quantum thin film at normal incidence giving rise to both a reflected and a transmitted matter wave. Our primary goal is to determine mathematical formulae for predicting the reflectance R and transmittance T of the quantum thin film as a function of the kinetic energy K and its potential energy U . The fundamental equations to be used in the mathematical analysis are the relativistic Dirac vector field equations.

VII. MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS

a) Optical Thin Film Analysis

i. Electromagnetic Waves

As shown in Figure (2), five electromagnetic waves were considered. In the left region, we have the incident ( E i , H i ) and reflected ( E r , H r ) waves. Within the optical thin film, we have forward ( E f , H f ) waves and backward ( E b , H b ) waves. In the right region, we only have the transmitted ( E t , H t ) wave. Equation (23) allows us to express the following relationship between the electromagnetic wave electric and magnetic wave amplitudes:

Left Region: Incident and Reflected Waves

( 29 ) ϵ L E i = μ L H i ϵ L E r = μ L H r

Optical Thin Film: Forward and Backward Propagating Waves

( 30 ) ϵ F E f = μ F H f ϵ F E b = μ F H b

Right Region: Transmitted Wave

( 31 ) ϵ R E t = μ R H t

The subscripts L , R and F refer to the left, right and optical thin film, respectively.

ii. Optical Thin Film Boundary Conditions

Recall that the incident electromagnetic wave impinges on the thin film at a normal incidence. The electric and magnetic vectors are perpendicular (transverse waves) to the direction of wave propagation. At each of the two planar boundaries separating the various regions, the tangential components of the electric and magnetic field vectors are continuous across the boundary [1]. Mathematically, this implies that:

( 32 ) E i + E r = E f + E b
( 33 ) H i H r = H f H b

Boundary 2 on the Right

( 34 ) E f exp { + i ϕ } + E b exp { i ϕ } = E t
( 35 ) H f exp { + i ϕ } H b exp { i ϕ } = H t

The phase angle ϕ , associated with the optical thin film [5] depends on three quantities: the index of refraction n = μ ϵ of the thin film, the thickness w of the thin film and the wavelength λ of the incident electromagnetic wave. The mathematical expression for ϕ is given by

( 36 ) ϕ = k n w where k = 2 π / λ .

Using equations (29), (30), and (31), we can express the magnitude of the magnetic field amplitudes in terms of the electric field amplitudes. That is

Boundary 1 on the Left

( 37 ) E i + E r = E f + E b
( 38 ) Y L E i Y L E r = Y F E f Y F E b

Boundary 2 on the Right

( 39 ) E f exp { + i ϕ } + E b exp { i ϕ } = E t
( 40 ) Y F E f exp { + i ϕ } Y F E b exp { i ϕ } = Y R E t

From these four equations, with little algebra, we can eliminate the E f and E b fields, leaving two equations that involve the three fields E r , E t and E i . The following ratios can be determined from the remaining two equations.

( 41 ) r = E r / E i and t = E t / E i .

The quantities r and t represent the reflectivity and transmissivity of the optical thin films, respectively.

iii. Optical Thin Film Reflectivity and Transmissivity

The final mathematical formulae for the reflectivity r and transmissivity t of a single optical thin film are given by:

( 42 ) r = Y F ( Y L Y R ) cos ϕ + ( Y F 2 Y L Y R ) i sin ϕ Y F ( Y L + Y R ) cos ϕ ( Y F 2 + Y L Y R ) i sin ϕ
( 43 ) t = 2 Y F Y L Y F ( Y L + Y R ) cos ϕ ( Y F 2 + Y L Y R ) i sin ϕ .

To compute the reflectance R and transmittance T of the optical thin films, the following equations were used.

( 44 ) R = r r and T = t t .

The superscript symbol ( ) implies the complex conjugate operation.

b) Quantum Thin Film Analysis

Recall that the traditional Maxwell vector field equations (1) through (4) are similar in structure to the newly formulated relativistic Dirac vector field equations (5) through (8). Using the same mathematical analysis procedure for the single-quantum thin-film case leads to equations (42), (43), and (44) to describe the reflection and transmission characteristics of the single-quantum thin film.

Several physical quantities for the optical thin-film case must be replaced by certain physical quantities for the quantum thin-film case. A conversion table summarizing the details of changing certain classical electrodynamic quantities to relativistic quantum-mechanical quantities, is presented in Table 1.

Table 8607: Table 1: Unified Approach Conversion Table
Dielectric Material PropertiesClassical Electromagnetic TheoryRelativistic Quantum Theory
Electric FieldEU
Magnetic FieldHL
Permittivity1 ≤ ε(γ + 1)
Permeability1 ≤ μ(γ - 1)
Refractive Indexn = √με√γ2 - 1
AdmittanceY = √ε/μ√(γ + 1)/(γ - 1)
ImpedanceZ = √μ/ε√(γ - 1)/(γ + 1)
Thickness0 < w0 < w
Wavenumberk = 2π/λk = Eo/ħc
Phase Factorφ = knwφ = knw

Notice the wavenumber k , in the relativistic quantum theory column, is the same constant κ defined in equation (9) and appearing in the Dirac vector field equations (7) and (8). Two examples of reflectance and transmittance graphs for a single optical thin film and a single quantum barrier thin film are presented in Figures (4) and (5), respectively.

Single Dielectric Optical Thin Film Example
Figure 4: 1-Layer Dielectric Thin Film Structure
Figure 4: 1-Layer Dielectric Thin Film Structure

Referring to Figure (2), the left and right free space (vacuum) region's permittivity ϵ L = ϵ R = 1 and permeability μ L = μ R = 1 . According to Table 1, the refractive index n L = n R = 1 , the admittance Y L = Y R = 1 and the impedance Z L = Z R = 1 for both of these free space regions as well. The optical thin film has a permittivity ϵ F = 4 and a permeability μ F = 1 . This implies the refractive index n F = 2 , the admittance Y F = 2 and the impedance Z F = 1 / 2 . The optical thin-film thickness w = 200   nm . The wavelength λ of the incident electromagnetic wave was varied between 400   nm to 800   nm . Equations (42), (43) and (44) were used to evaluate the reflectance R and transmittance T as a function of the wavelength λ using MATLAB computer software, reference [6]. The left hand side of Figure (4) depicts the optical thin-film structure.

Single Thin Film Quantum Barrier Example
Figure 5: 1-Layer Thin Film Quantum Barrier
Figure 5: 1-Layer Thin Film Quantum Barrier

Referring to Figure (3), an electron, whose kinetic energy K L varies between 0 eV and 300 eV, impinges upon a single quantum barrier at normal incidence. The left and right free space region's potential energy U L = U R = 0 . The potential energy of the quantum barrier U F = 40 eV and its thickness w = 0.120   nm . With the help of Table 1 and equations (42) through (43), the reflectance R and transmittance T plots are shown in Figure(5). The Lorentz factor for each region is determined using the equation γ x = ( E U x ) / E o where the total energy of the electron is given by E = E o + K x + U x . Here x = L , R or F for the left, right or quantum thin-film regions. Once the Lorentz factors are determined, then the various quantities listed in the relativistic quantum theory column of Table 1, may be computed. The results presented in Figure(5) are in agreement with those presented in reference [7].

VIII. MULTILAYER THIN FILM STRUCTURES

a) Multilayer Thin Film Diagram

Figure (6) depicts a multilayer thin-film structure consisting of N thin films with parallel planar boundaries. An incident electromagnetic wave or a quantum mechanical matter wave strikes a multilayer thin-film structure at normal incidence, resulting in reflected and transmitted waves. Equations for predicting the reflectance R and transmittance T of the multilayer thin-film structure are presented.

Figure 6: Multilayer Thin Film Structure
Figure 6: Multilayer Thin Film Structure

b) Matrix Representation

The key matrix equation for this section is given by

( 45 ) Y R | Ψ R = M Y L | Ψ L
| Ψ R = 1 2 Z R M Y L | Ψ L .

The 2-by-2 matrix M contains all information about the thin-film structure, where

( 47 ) M = M N M 3 M 2 M 1 .

Each 2-by-2 matrix M n , for n = 1 , 2 , 3 N , is defined by

( 48 ) M n [ cos ϕ n Z n i sin ϕ n Y n i sin ϕ n cos ϕ n ] .

This equation indicates properties of the n th thin film must be known, namely ϕ n , Y n and Z n , the phase angle, admittance, and impedance of the n th thin film, respectively. From Table 1, the admittance Y n and the impedance Z n are related by Z n = 1 / Y n .

The electric-field magnitudes E i , E r and E t for the incident, reflected, and transmitted waves, respectively, are the elements of the wave vectors

( 49 ) | Ψ R [ E t 0 ] and | Ψ L [ E i E r ] .

The remaining three matrices Y R , Z R and Y L are defined by

Y R [ + 1 + 1 + Y R Y R ] Z R [ + 1 + Z R + 1 Z R ] Y L [ + 1 + 1 + Y L Y L ] . ( 5 0 )

Once the matrices Y R , Z R , Y L and M n for all n values have been determined, as listed in Table 1, the reflectivity r and transmissivity t can be determined. Finally, the reflectance R and transmittance T are given by

( 51 ) R = r r and T = t t .

In the following two sections, reflectance R and transmittance T graphs, based on numerical computer computations, are presented for a number of different optical thin-film structures as well as quantum thin-film structures. MATLAB computer software was employed for both computations and graphics.

IX. OPTICAL THIN FILM GRAPHICAL RESULTS

The reflectance and transmittance characteristics of four different multilayer optical thin-film structures are presented in this section based on the formalism of Maxwell vector field equations. Each thin film in the multilayer structure is characterized by having a constant index of refraction n and thickness w . For these four examples, the permeability constant μ = 1 and the permittivity constant ϵ = n 2 .

a) 11-Layer High-Reflectance Mirror Structure Figure 7: 11-Layer High-Reflectance Mirror Structure

The results shown in Figure (7), correspond to light whose wavelength varies between 400 nm and 800 nm , incident upon an 11-layer high-reflectance mirror structure. The left portion of this figure depicts the multilayer structure physical properties. The results are in excellent agreement with those published in reference [5].

b) 15-Layer Long-Wave Band-Pass Optical Filter

Reference [5] provides an excellent discussion of band-pass optical filters. The next two examples represent long- and short-wave band-pass optical filters, respectively.

15 Thin-Film Layers

Optical Thin-Film Analysis Software 15-Layer Long-Wave Band-Pass Optical Filter Vacuum Wavelength: 400 to 800 nm Angle of Incidence: 0 deg
Figure 8: 15-Layer Long-Wave Band-Pass Optical Filter
Figure 8: 15-Layer Long-Wave Band-Pass Optical Filter

This example is that of a 15-layer long-wave band-pass optical filter as shown in Figure (8). The wavelength of the incident light was varied between 400 nm and 800 nm . Again, the results are in excellent agreement with those presented in [5].

c) 15-Layer Short-Wave Band-Pass Optical Filter

15 Thin-Film Layers

Optical Thin-Film Analysis Software 15-Layer Short-Wave Band-Pass Optical Filter Vacuum Wavelength: 400 to 800 nm Angle of Incidence: 0 deg

Figure 9: 15-Layer Short-Wave Band-Pass Optical Filter In Figure (9) is shown a 15-layer short-wave band pass optical filter. The wavelength of the incident light was varied between 400 nm and 800 nm . The results are in excellent agreement with those presented in [5].

d) 15-Layer Narrow Band-Pass Optical Filter

Figure 10: 15-Layer Narrow Band-Pass Optical Filter
Figure 10: 15-Layer Narrow Band-Pass Optical Filter

This example is that of a 15-layer narrow band-pass optical filter centered at approximately 600 nm . The wavelength of the incident light was varied between 400 nm and 800 nm . The results shown in Figure (10) are in excellent agreement with those presented in reference [5].

X. QUANTUM THIN FILM GRAPHICAL RESULTS

The reflectance and transmittance characteristics of four different multilayer quantum wells and barrier structures are presented in this section, based on the relativistic Dirac vector field equation formalism. Each thin film in the multilayer structure was characterized by the potential energy U and thickness w .

a) 11-Layer Periodic Well-and-Barrier Structure

11 Thin-Film Layers Quantum Thin-Film Analysis Software 11-Layer Periodic Quantum Well-and-Angle of Incidence:0 deg

Relativistic Kinetic Energy: K = E - Eo (eV) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Kinetic Energy K (eV) Figure 11: 11-Layer Periodic Quantum Well-and-Barrier Structure In this example we consider a non-relativistic electron whose kinetic energy K was varied between 0 eV and 3 eV impinging upon an 11-layer periodic quantum well-and-barrier structure. Each thin film in the structure has a thickness of 0.300 nm. The electron has a rest-mass energy equal to 0.511 MeV. The results of our numerical computations are presented in the Figure (11). These results are in excellent agreement with results published in the literature [8] based on non-relativistic quantum theory.

b) 3-Layer Quantum Well-and-Barrier Structure

In this example, the energy levels of a rectangular potential well are determined by casting the problem into one involving a potential well surrounded by two identical quantum barriers. Electron tunneling through the 3-layer quantum well-and-barrier structure occurs at kinetic energies corresponding to or near the energies of the quantum well.

Figure 12: 3-Layer Quantum Well-and-Barrier Structure For this case, a non-relativistic electron whose kinetic energy varied between 0 eV and 50 eV impinges upon the quantum well-and-barrier structure as shown in Figure (12). The well has a width of 0.300 nm . Each barrier has a width of 0.150 nm and a height of 34.6 eV . If the barrier thicknesses are increased, this narrows the sharpness of the reflection and transmission spikes but not their location. In this case, the quantum well has 3-energy levels: 2.76 eV , 10.9 eV and 23.6 eV . The results obtained are in excellent agreement with the material presented in reference [9] on a finite potential well.

c) 21-Layer Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Structure

In this example, the quantum harmonic oscillator problem is converted into a multilayer quantum well-and-barrier problem. The goal was to determine the energy levels of a quantum harmonic oscillator characterized by a potential energy 1 2 k x 2 where k is the spring constant and m is the mass of the attached particle.

Figure 13: 21-Layer Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Structure In particular, the spring constant k = 2000   N / m and the mass m = 2 × 10 26   kg . The corresponding angular frequency ω is given by ω = k / m = 3.16 × 10 14 rad / s . The energy levels of the harmonic oscillator are given by
( 52 ) E n = ω ( n + 1 / 2 )

where is reduced Planck's constant. The truncated multilayer quantum well-and-barrier total width w = 3.88 nm . The structure is depicted in Figure (13). The kinetic energy K of the incident particle was varied between 0 eV and 2.65 eV. The eight energy levels associated with this truncated quantum well-and-barrier structure were correctly predicted, as shown in the graphs above and in agreement with the theory presented in reference [10].

d) 3-Layer Nuclear Potential Well-and-Barrier Structure

Again, the Dirac vector field equations are a set of relativistic field equations, whereas the Schrödinger wave equation is a non-relativistic equation. The next example concerns the predicted energy levels of a 3-layer nuclear potential well structure [11].

3 Thin-Film Layers

Quantum Thin-Film Analysis Software 3-Layer Nuclear Potential Well-and-Barrier Angle of Incidence: 0 deg
Figure 14: 3-Layer Nuclear Potential Well-and-Barrier Structure
Figure 14: 3-Layer Nuclear Potential Well-and-Barrier Structure

Here again the problem was converted into quantum well-and-barrier problem. This time a neutron, whose rest mass energy is 939.6 MeV, was used as the incident particle. Its kinetic energy K was varied between 1 MeV and 80 MeV. At 80 MeV the neutron has a speed v = 0.39 c and a Lorentz factor of γ = 1.085 , certainly considered relativistic. The nuclear potential well has a width w = 8.00 fm. Each of the two identical surrounding quantum barriers have a width of 2.00 fm and potential energy levels U = 50 MeV. The four energy levels of the nuclear potential well were correctly predicted: 2.4 MeV, 9.6 MeV, 21.5 MeV and 36.6 MeV as shown in Figure (14). These predictions are in excellent agreement with reference [11].

XI. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

  1. The traditional Maxwell vector field equations in Gaussian units [1] and the newly formulated relativistic Dirac vector field equations in Gaussian units [2] and [3] serve as the underlying equations for the formulation of a unified approach for determining the transmission and reflection properties of multilayer optical and quantum thin-film structures. Based on the similarity between these two sets of field equations, the formulation of a unified approach is straightforward.

  2. In particular, using the Maxwell vector field equations describing a dielectric material, a pair of analytical equations is used to predict the reflectance R and transmittance T of a single thin-film layer, for the case of normal incidence of an electromagnetic wave. The reflectance R and transmittance T represent the probabilities that a single photon, associated with the electromagnetic wave, is either reflected or transmitted through the thin-film layer.

  3. Similarly, using the Dirac vector field equations, a pair of analytical equations can be used to predict the reflectance R and transmittance T properties of a single quantum barrier in the case of the normal incidence of a quantum mechanical matter wave. Reflectance R and transmittance T represent the probabilities that a single particle (electron or neutron) associated with the matter wave will be either reflected or transmitted through the quantum barrier.

  4. Upon comparing the classical electromagnetic and relativistic quantum mechanical equations for predicting reflectance R and transmittance T , it is clear that these equations are identical. The only difference is that certain classical electromagnetic quantities can be replaced by suitable relativistic quantum mechanical quantities. Table 1: Unified Approach Conversion Table.

  5. The single thin-film approach has been generalized to handle multilayer thin-film structures. Using the information in Table 1, a computer program using MATLAB computational and graphics software was developed to determine the reflection and transmission characteristics of either multilayer optical thin-film structures or multilayer quantum well-and-barrier structures. Predictions based on this unified approach and computer software development were tested thoroughly. The results were compared with those published in the literature and showed excellent agreement.

  6. Several figures depicting thin-film structures were included in this study: Multilayer Thin Film Structure Consisting of N Thin Films (1), Single Optical Thin Film (2), Single Quantum Thin Film (3), and Multilayer Thin Film Structure (6).

  7. Reflectance and transmittance results were presented for a number of optical and quantum-mechanical single and multilayer thin-film structures. These include: 1-Layer Dielectric Thin Film Structure (4), 1-Layer Thin Film Quantum Barrier (5), 11-Layer High-Reflectance Mirror Structure (7), 15-Layer Long-Wave Band-Pass Optical Filter (8), 15-Layer Short-Wave Band-Pass Optical Filter (9), 15-Layer Narrow Band-Pass Optical Filter (10), 11-Layer Periodic Quantum Well-and-Barrier Structure (11), 3-Layer Well-and-Barrier Structure (12), 21-Layer Quantum Harmonic Oscillator Structure (13), and 3-Layer Nuclear Potential Well-and-Barrier Structure (14).

  8. Because of the similarity between the classical Maxwell vector field and relativistic Dirac vector field equations, researchers now have an alternative method for analyzing the nature of similar physical phenomena in the optical and quantum regimes.

Declarations

Author Contribution Statement: The author conceived and designed the analysis; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed analysis tools and data; Wrote the paper.

Funding Statement: This study did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data Access Statement: Research data supporting this publication are generated in this document. All relevant data are within this paper.

No additional information is available for this study.

References

11 Cites in Article
  1. John Jackson (1962). Unknown Title.
  2. Richard Bocker,B Roy Frieden (2018). A New Matrix Formulation of the Maxwell and Dirac Equations.
  3. Richard Bocker,B Roy Frieden (2019). Eight-by-Eight Spacetime Matrix Operator and Its Applications.
  4. David Halliday,Robert Resnick,Jearl Walker (2005). Halliday, David. Introductory nuclear physics. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1950. 558 p. $6.50.
  5. H Angus,Macleod (2017). Thin-Film Optical Filters, Fifth Edition.
  6. Amos Gilat (2015). MATLAB -An Introduction with Applications.
  7. (2024). Wikipedia A -The Free Encyclopedia -Rectangular Potential Barrier -Wikipedia Foundations Inc.
  8. D Sprung,Hua Wu,J Martorell (1993). Scattering by a finite periodic potential.
  9. (2024). Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopedia.
  10. A Wikipedi (2024). The Free Encyclopedia -Quantum Harmonic Oscillator -Wikipedia Foundations Inc.
  11. Wim Vegt (2009). Unification Theory for Classical Mechanics, Electrodynamics, Quantum Physics, General Relativity, and the Interaction between Gravity and Light.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Richard Bocker. 2026. "A Unified Approach for Determining Optical and Quantum Multilayer Thin Film Reflectance and Transmittance". Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - A: Physics & Space Science GJSFR-A Volume 25 (GJSFR Volume 25 Issue A1).

Download Citation

Enhanced quantum imaging for optical and multivariable thermal film transmittance. Advances in optical and quantum physics studies.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-A Classification LCC: QC176.8.T5
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
March 22, 2025

Language
English
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 455
Total Downloads: 27
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

A Unified Approach for Determining Optical and Quantum Multilayer Thin Film Reflectance and Transmittance

Richard Bocker
Richard Bocker San Diego State University