Accuracy of Barrett Versus Third Generation Intraocular Lens Formula Across all Axial Lengths in Indian Eyes

Accuracy of Barrett Versus Third Generation Intraocular Lens Formula Across all Axial Lengths in Indian Eyes

Dr. Raline Solomon Amalakaran

Contact

Dr.Tamilarasi

Contact

Dr. Gitansha

Contact

Dr. D Ramamurthy

Contact

Accuracy of Barrett Versus Third Generation Intraocular Lens Formula Across all Axial Lengths in Indian Eyes

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

446BU

Accuracy of Barrett Versus Third Generation Intraocular Lens Formula Across all Axial Lengths in Indian Eyes Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of Barrett Versus 3 rd generation formulae for different intraocular lens (IOL) powers for Indian eyes with different axial lengths.

References

18 Cites in Article

Reference Format

J Kane,A Van Heerden,A Atik,C Petsoglou (2016). Intraocular lens power formula accuracy: comparison of 7 formulas.
P Aristodemou,Knox Cartwright,N Sparrow,J Johnston,R (2011). Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry.
John Ladas,Aazim Siddiqui,Uday Devgan,Albert Jun (2015). A 3-D “Super Surface” Combining Modern Intraocular Lens Formulas to Generate a “Super Formula” and Maximize Accuracy.
Graham Barrett (1993). An improved universal theoretical formula for intraocular lens power prediction.
(2013). 2a IBM SPSS Statistics Processes for PC.
Thomas Olsen (2007). Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review.
Alexander Lee,Mujtaba Qazi,Jay Pepose (2008). Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation.
Joseph Colin,Sohéla El Kebir,Emmanuelle Eydoux,Thanh Hoang-Xuan,Pascal Rozot,Marc Weiser (2010). Assessment of patient satisfaction with outcomes of and ophthalmic care for cataract surgery.
Anders Behndig,Per Montan,Ulf Stenevi,Maria Kugelberg,Mats Lundström (2011). One million cataract surgeries: Swedish National Cataract Register 1992–2009.
Wolfgang Haigis (2009). Intraocular lens calculation in extreme myopia.
Sheridan Lam (2013). Comparing optical low coherence reflectometry and immersion ultrasound in refractive outcome after cataract surgery.
G Carifi,F Aiello,V Zygoura,N Kopsachilis,V Maurino (2015). Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by multiple currently available intraocular lens power calculation formulas in small eyes.
Olga Reitblat,Ehud Assia,Guy Kleinmann,Adi Levy,Graham Barrett,Adi Abulafia (2015). Accuracy of predicted refraction with multifocal intraocular lenses using two biometry measurement devices and multiple intraocular lens power calculation formulas.
R Gale,M Saldana,R Johnston,B Zuberbuhler,M Mckibbin (2009). Benchmark standards for refractive outcomes after NHS cataract surgery.
S Simon,Y Chee,R Haddadin,P Veldman,S Borboli-Gerogiannis,S Brauner,K Chang,S Chen,M Gardiner,S Greenstein,C Kloek,T Chen (2014). Achieving target refraction after cataract surgery.
R Sheard (2014). Optimising biometry for best outcomes in cataract surgery.
D Zhou,Z Sun,G Deng (2019). Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by intraocular lens power calculation formulas in high myopia.
S Gökce,J Zeiter,M Weikert,D Koch,W Hill,L Wang (2017). Intraocular lens power calculations in short eyes using 7 formulas.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. Raline Solomon Amalakaran. 2020. \u201cAccuracy of Barrett Versus Third Generation Intraocular Lens Formula Across all Axial Lengths in Indian Eyes\u201d. Global Journal of Medical Research - F: Diseases GJMR-F Volume 20 (GJMR Volume 20 Issue F9): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJMR Volume 20 Issue F9
Pg. 41- 45

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjmra

Print ISSN 0975-5888

e-ISSN 2249-4618

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMR-F Classification: NLMC Code: WW 354

Submission ReceivedDecember 6, 2019
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 5, 2020
Published January 15, 2020

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

October 5, 2020

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 2234

Total Downloads: 1108

2026 Trends

Published Article

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of Barrett Versus 3 rd generation formulae for different intraocular lens (IOL) powers for Indian eyes with different axial lengths.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]