Achievement in Training: Recorded Video Compared to Face-to-Face Environments

Achievement in Training: Recorded Video Compared to Face-to-Face Environments

Kate Quigley

Contact

Achievement in Training: Recorded Video Compared to Face-to-Face Environments

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

D8FA1

Achievement in Training: Recorded Video Compared to Face-to-Face Environments Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

During the 2020-2021 years, it has been necessary for organizations to rethink how they conduct their daily operations in light of COVID-19 restrictions. One of the many activities within organizations is to provide new and recurrent training to their employees. In a similar vein, universities also had to make adaptations to instructional methods. This change provided an opportunity to compare student achievement in two different instructional modalities; one with lectures delivered in a full face-to-face format, and the other with recorded video lectures delivered in online platform. Both formats were conducted in morning and afternoon sessions. Three sets of test results were measured to compare the outcomes between two years. This study had mixed results, two of the three test results sets between the years showed no significant difference between face-to-face and recorded video lectures, while one of the three test results provided evidence that the results were different between instructional methods. The results of this study could provide applicable information to organizations and help to provide a roadmap for providing training in different formats. It is noteworthy that providing instruction in recorded video formats could be less expensive to organizations and also provide more flexibility for employees to fit recurrent t into their daily schedules.

References

11 Cites in Article

Reference Format

J Arias,J Swinton,K Anderson (2018). Online Vs. Face-to-Face: A Comparison of Student Outcomes with Random Assignment.
C Bigelow (2009). Comparing student performance in an online versus a face to face introductory turfgrass science course -A case study.
T Brockfeld,B Müller,J De Laffoli (2018). Video versus live lecture courses: A comparative evaluation of lecture types and results.
S Kinash,D Knight,M Mclean (2015). How does the use of technology in classrooms affect student learning?.
Christopher Lange,Jamie Costley (2020). Improving online video lectures: learning challenges created by media.
W Leadbeater,T Shutterworth,J Couperthwaite,K Nightingale (2013). Evaluating the use and impact of lecture recording in undergraduates: Evidence for distinct approaches by different groups of students.
Mi Lee,Hongbok An (2018). A study of antecedents influencing eWOM for online lecture website.
Frances O’callaghan,David Neumann,Liz Jones,Peter Creed (2015). The use of lecture recordings in higher education: A review of institutional, student, and lecturer issues.
B Panther,W Wright,J (2012). Providing a flexible learning environment: Are on-line lectures the answer.
D Pons,L Walker,J Hollis,H Thomas (2013). Evaluation of student engagement with a lecture capture system.
Tomoko Traphagan,John Kucsera,Kyoko Kishi (2010). Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Kate Quigley. 2021. \u201cAchievement in Training: Recorded Video Compared to Face-to-Face Environments\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 21 (GJMBR Volume 21 Issue A7).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 21 Issue A7

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-A Classification JEL Code: M19

Submission ReceivedSeptember 14, 2021
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted October 1, 2021
Published October 15, 2021

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 6, 2021

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 2173

Total Downloads: 982

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]