Loading menu…

Air Transport Policy for Mauritius a The Way Forward

Dr. Hemant B. Chittoo
Dr. Hemant B. Chittoo * § BSc (Hons.) First Class, MA (Economic and Social Studies), PhD, Associate Professor
§ University of Technology, Mauritius

Send Message

To: Author

Air Transport Policy for Mauritius a The Way Forward

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

9OCD4

Air Transport Policy for Mauritius a The Way Forward Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Reading Preferences
Font Size
Line Spacing
Background
This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

The dichotomy in policy making regarding the hotel industry and air transport, makes it imperative for the government to formulate clear policy processes in order to avoid conflicting situations among stakeholders. This paper looks at the various issues regarding policy theories and examines the various theories that have made their mark in other countries. It has often been contended that the national carrier, the hotel industry and government have often been looking in different directions instead of coming up with consistent policies common to all stakeholders where all could deploy efforts to consolidate the tourism industry and at the same time contribute to economic growth.

References

44 Cites in Article
  1. 1. S Alinsky (1989). Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals, Vintage. Rules for Radicals: A Pragmatic Primer for Realistic Radicals, Vintage, 2
  2. 2. F Baumgarten,B Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Agendas and Instability in American Politics
  3. 3. S Beder (2003). The Electricity Con Game, PR Watch, Centre for Media and Democracy. The Electricity Con Game, PR Watch, Centre for Media and Democracy
  4. 4. M Cali,C Ellis,Willem De Velde,D (2008). The Contribution of Services to Development: The Role of Regulation and Trade Liberalisation. The Contribution of Services to Development: The Role of Regulation and Trade Liberalisation
  5. 5. P Dempsey (1995). Sysfunctional Economics and the Airline Industry, handbook of Airline Economics. Sysfunctional Economics and the Airline Industry, handbook of Airline Economics, 185-200.
  6. 6. G Domhoff (1990). The Power and the State: How Policy is Made in America. The Power and the State: How Policy is Made in America
  7. 7. K Dowding (1995). Model or Metaphor? A critical Review of the Policy Network Approach. Political Studies, 43, 136-158.
  8. 8. J Eberg (1997). Waste and Policy Learning. Policy Dynamics of Waste Management and Waste Incineration in the Netherlands and Bavaria. Waste and Policy Learning. Policy Dynamics of Waste Management and Waste Incineration in the Netherlands and Bavaria
  9. 9. M Fenger,P Klok (2001). Interdependency, beliefs and coalition behavior: A contribution to the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences, 43, 157-170.
  10. 10. F Fisher (1997). Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices
  11. 11. C Friedrich (2007). Public Policy. Public Policy
  12. 12. J Grin,R Hope (1997). Towards a Theory of the Policy Process: Problems, Promises and Prospects of the AFC, paper presented at the ARIPS meeting. Stealth Democracy: Americans' Beliefs about How Governments Should work
  13. 13. H Jenkins-Smith (1990). Democratic politics and Policy Analysis. Democratic politics and Policy Analysis
  14. 14. P John (1998). Analysing Public Policy. Analysing Public Policy, 17
  15. 15. John Kingdon (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 1976, 1977, 1978, 1979 [United States]. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
  16. 16. William Leach,Paul Sabatier (2005). To Trust an Adversary: Integrating Rational and Psychological Models of Collaborative Policymaking. American Political Science Review, 99(4), 491-503.
  17. 17. E Lindquist (1990). Social scientists, policy, and the state, edited by Stephen Brooks and Alain‐G. Gagnon, New York: Praeger, 1990, 184 pp. Price: $42.95 cloth. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(2), 314-317.
  18. 18. E Lindquist (2001). Empowering Bahraini Nurses through Political Competence: A Strategic Framework for Leadership and Policy Influence. Journal of Comprehensive Nursing Research and Care, 10(2)
  19. 19. B Marin,R Mayntz (1991). Introduction: Studying Policy Networks. Policy Networks. Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations, 11-23.
  20. 20. David Marsh,R Rhodes (1992). Policy Communities and Issue Networks. Policy Networks in British Government, 249-268.
  21. 21. C Mills (2000). The Power Elite. The Power Elite
  22. 22. D Mutz (2006). Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participative Democracy. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative Versus Participative Democracy
  23. 23. W Parsons (1995). Public Policy. An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Chelterham, 26
  24. 24. P Pross (1986). Group Politics and Public Policy. Group Politics and Public Policy
  25. 25. J Reisman,A Geinapp,S Stachiowiak (2007). A Guide to Measuring Advocacy and Policy, Organisation and Research Services. A Guide to Measuring Advocacy and Policy, Organisation and Research Services
  26. 26. S Rose,T Barett (2006). The Best Transportation System in the World. The Best Transportation System in the World
  27. 27. P Sabatier (1986). Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Implementation Research: A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis. Journal of Public Policy, 6, 719-736.
  28. 28. P Sabatier,H Jenkins-Smith (1993). The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Assessment, Revisions and implications for Scholars and practitioners. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, 31.
  29. 29. Paul Sabatier (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98-130.
  30. 30. P Sabatier (1999). Theories of the Policy Process. Theories of the Policy Process
  31. 31. Paul Sabatier,Christopher Weible (1999). The Advocacy Coalition Framework. Theories of the Policy Process, 189-220.
  32. 32. P Sabatier,M Zafonte (2001). Policy Knowledge: Advocacy Organizations. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 11563-11568.
  33. 33. P Sabatier (2007). Theories of Policy Process. Theories of Policy Process
  34. 34. Edella Schlager,William Blomquist (1996). A Comparison of Three Emerging Theories of the Policy Process. Political Research Quarterly, 49(3), 651.
  35. 35. Edella Schlager (1996). Policy making and collective action: Defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Sciences, 28(3), 243-270.
  36. 36. W Schramm (1971). Notes on case studies of instructional media projects. Working paper for the Academy for Educational Development
  37. 37. Adrian Smith (2000). Policy Networks and Advocacy Coalitions: Explaining Policy Change and Stability in UK Industrial Pollution Policy?. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(1), 95-114.
  38. 38. S Stachowiak (2007). A Guide to Measuring Policy and Advocacy, Organisational Research Services. A Guide to Measuring Policy and Advocacy, Organisational Research Services, 42
  39. 39. A Thierer (1998). A Five-Point Checklist for Successful Electricity Deregulation Legislation. A Five-Point Checklist for Successful Electricity Deregulation Legislation
  40. 40. Amos Tversky,Daniel Kahneman (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.
  41. 41. Christopher Weible,Paul Sabatier,Kelly Mcqueen (2009). Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework. Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 121-140.
  42. 42. C Weiss (1977). Research for Policy's Sake: The Enlightenment Function of Social Research. Policy Analysis, 3(4), 531-545.
  43. 43. C Weiss,E Lindquist (2003). conversation: Carol Weiss and Evert Lindquist on Policymaking and Research. conversation: Carol Weiss and Evert Lindquist on Policymaking and Research
  44. 44. S Wilks,M Wright (1987). The Development of Policy Network Analyses. The Development of Policy Network Analyses

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Dr. N. P. Mootien. . "Air Transport Policy for Mauritius a The Way Forward". Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 12 (GJMBR Volume 12 Issue A2).

More Citation Formats

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-A Classification 150701 JEL Code: R42
R48
Version of record
v1.2

Language
English
Order Article Reprint
Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 7.2K
Total Downloads: 506
All Trends

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Air Transport Policy for Mauritius a The Way Forward

N. Mootien
N. Mootien University of Technology, Mauritius
N. Mootien
N. Mootien <p>University of Technology, Mauritius</p>