An Analysis of Reader Engagement in Linguistic Research Articles

An Analysis of Reader Engagement in Linguistic Research Articles

Junhan Luan

Contact

Yi Zhang

Contact

Northwestern Polytechnical University

An Analysis of Reader Engagement in Linguistic Research Articles

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

HMT5Z

An Analysis of Reader Engagement in Linguistic Research Articles Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

This study investigated the use of reader engagement in 60 RAs from the international linguistic journal Language Learning. Based on the Model of Stance and Engagement and IMRD Structure under Genre Analysis theory, findings suggested that there appear a total of 53.1 reader engagement markers per 10,000 words. Under IMRD Structure, reader engagement markers occur most frequently in Introduction section (76.9 words per 10,000 words), followed by Discussion, Method, and Results. There exists a significant difference of the distribution in reader engagement markers among the four sections (X2=22.747, df=3, p

References

17 Cites in Article

Reference Format

C Bazerman (1988). Shaping written knowledge.
Ken Hyland (2000). Disciplinary Discourses, Michigan Classics Ed..
K Hyland (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles.
K Hyland (2001). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles.
K Hyland (2002). Directives: Argument and Engagement in Academic Writing.
K Hyland (2002). Academic argument: Induction or interaction.
Ken Hyland (2002). What do they mean? Questions in academic writing.
Ken Hyland (2005). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse.
K Hyland (2005). Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices.
K Hyland (2005). Review: Hyland (2009) Academic Discourse: English in a Global Context. London: Continuum.
Ken Hyland (2006). English for Academic Purposes.
K Hyland,K Jiang (2016). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance.
K Hyland,K Jiang (2016). A diachronic study of academic engagement.
K Hyland,P Tse (2004). Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal.
John Swales (1990). 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, selected 45–47, 52–60.
G Thompson (2001). Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue with the reader.
G West (1980). That-nominal constructions in traditional rhetorical divisions of scientific research papers.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Junhan Luan. 2018. \u201cAn Analysis of Reader Engagement in Linguistic Research Articles\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education GJHSS-G Volume 18 (GJHSS Volume 18 Issue G13): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJHSS Volume 18 Issue G13
Pg. 41- 48

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJHSS-G Classification: FOR Code: 200499

Submission ReceivedDecember 7, 2017
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 31, 2017
Published January 15, 2018

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 29, 2018

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 132

Country: China

Subject: Global Journal of Human-Social Science - G: Linguistics & Education

Authors: Junhan Luan, Yi Zhang (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 174

Total Views (Real + Logic): 2951

Total Downloads (simulated): 1439

Publish Date: 2018 12, Sat

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 43 views
Month 2: 42 views
Month 3: 61 views
Month 4: 56 views
Month 5: 41 views
Month 6: 49 views
Month 7: 17 views
Month 8: 31 views
Month 9: 42 views
Month 10: 34 views
Month 11: 25 views
Month 12: 28 views
Month 13: 24 views
Month 14: 37 views
Month 15: 24 views
Month 16: 29 views
Month 17: 21 views
Month 18: 13 views
Month 19: 33 views
Month 20: 24 views
Month 21: 33 views
Month 22: 33 views
Month 23: 40 views
Month 24: 31 views
Month 25: 35 views
Month 26: 45 views
Month 27: 32 views
Month 28: 27 views
Month 29: 35 views
Month 30: 39 views
Month 31: 15 views
Month 32: 12 views
Month 33: 19 views
Month 34: 28 views
Month 35: 27 views
Month 36: 49 views
Month 37: 26 views
Month 38: 28 views
Month 39: 45 views
Month 40: 28 views
Month 41: 47 views
Month 42: 11 views
Month 43: 19 views
Month 44: 21 views
Month 45: 34 views
Month 46: 46 views
Month 47: 12 views
Month 48: 29 views
Month 49: 21 views
Month 50: 23 views
Month 51: 22 views
Month 52: 21 views
Month 53: 11 views
Month 54: 44 views
Month 55: 43 views
Month 56: 19 views
Month 57: 17 views
Month 58: 21 views
Month 59: 28 views
Month 60: 35 views
Month 61: 31 views
Month 62: 34 views
Month 63: 30 views
Month 64: 21 views
Month 65: 27 views
Month 66: 25 views
Month 67: 31 views
Month 68: 46 views
Month 69: 23 views
Month 70: 21 views
Month 71: 26 views
Month 72: 36 views
Month 73: 37 views
Month 74: 13 views
Month 75: 38 views
Month 76: 12 views
Month 77: 43 views
Month 78: 48 views
Month 79: 28 views
Month 80: 34 views
Month 81: 51 views
Month 82: 50 views
Month 83: 55 views
Month 84: 52 views
Month 85: 56 views
Month 86: 41 views
Month 87: 49 views
Month 88: 34 views

Total Views: 2951

Total Downloads: 1439

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]