An Approach to Manage and Evaluate Engineering Asset Performance

An Approach to Manage and Evaluate Engineering Asset Performance

Mohammed Saif AL Saidi

Contact

John P. T Mo

Contact

RMIT University

An Approach to Manage and Evaluate Engineering Asset Performance

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

64YN4

An Approach to Manage and Evaluate Engineering Asset Performance Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Modern engineering assets are complex and very high in value. They are expected to function for years to come, with ability to handle the change in technology and ageing modification. The aging of an engineering asset and continues increase of vendors and contractors numbers forces the asset operation management (or Owner) to design an asset management system which can capture these changes. Furthermore, an accurate performance measurement and risk evaluation processes are highly needed. Therefore, this paper propose an asset management system performance evaluation for an engineering asset based on the System Support Engineering (SSE) principles. The research work explores the asset management system from a range of perspectives, interviewing managers from across an industrial organization. The factors contributing to complexity of an asset management system are described in context which clusters them into several key areas. It is proposed that SSE framework may then be used as a tool for analysis and management of asset with given an industrial example. The paper will conclude with discussion of potential application of theframework and opportunities for future research.

References

62 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Mohammed Alsaidi,Saif,Mo,P John (2013). An Empirical Approach to Model Formulation for System Support Engineering.
T Baines,H Lightfoot,O Benedettini,J Kay (2009). The servitization of manufacturing.
Stefano Biazzo,Patrizia Garengo (2012). Models for Measuring Performances.
Maura Borrego,Elliot Douglas,Catherine Amelink (2009). Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Research Methods in Engineering Education.
T Brady,H Rush,M Hobday,A Davies,D Probert,S Banerjee (1997). Tools for technology management: An academic perspective.
O Bustinza,D Arias-Aranda,L Gutierrez-Gutierrez (2010). Outsourcing, competitive capabilities and performance: an empirical study in service firms.
Sanfa Cai,Kai Ci,Bin Zou (2011). Producer Services Outsourcing Risk Control Based on Outsourcing Contract Design: Industrial Engineering Perspective.
Dilek Cetindamar,Phaal,Robert,David Probert (2009). Understanding technology management as a dynamic capability: A framework for technology management activities.
Y Correa,C Keating (2003). An approach to model formulation for systems of systems.
Felipe Csaszar (2012). Organizational structure as a determinant of performance: Evidence from mutual funds.
Gao Dandan,Chen Rongqiu (2010). New Research on New Service Development Based on Unified Services Theory.
Antonio Davila (2012). New Trends in Performance Measurement and Management Control.
Anders Drejer (1997). The discipline of management of technology, based on considerations related to technology.
Cynthia Eldridge,Natasha Palmer (2009). Performance-based payment: some reflections on the discourse, evidence and unanswered questions.
Bo Feng,Fan Zhi-Ping,Yanzhi Li (2011). A decision method for supplier selection in multiservice outsourcing.
Holger Görg,Aoife Hanley (2011). SERVICES OUTSOURCING AND INNOVATION: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION.
T Harris,F Boudreau,J Macgregor (1996). Performance assessment of multivariable feedback controllers.
T Harris,C Seppala,L Desborough (1999). A review of performance monitoring and assessment techniques for univariate and multivariate control systems.
P Herder,Ype Wijnia (2012). A Systems View on Infrastructure Asset Management.
Phillipp Hypko,Meike Tilebein,Ronald Gleich (2010). Benefits and uncertainties of performance‐based contracting in manufacturing industries.
Phillipp Hypko,Tilebein,Meike,Ronald Gleich (2010). Clarifying the concept of performancebased contracting in manufacturing industries: A research synthesis.
Mohieddine Jelali (2006). An overview of control performance assessment technology and industrial applications.
S Joe Qin (1998). Control performance monitoring — a review and assessment.
Rhonda Julien,Michael Foley,William Cluett (2004). Performance assessment using a model predictive control benchmark.
Gi-Du Kang (2006). The hierarchical structure of service quality: integration of technical and functional quality.
Cao Lan,B Ramesh (2008). Agile Requirements Engineering Practices: An Empirical Study.
Hsiao-Hui Lee,Edieal Pinker,Robert Shumsky (2012). Outsourcing a Two-Level Service Process.
Woo Lee,Sang-Young Moh,Hong-Jung Choi (2012). Plant Asset Management Today and Tomorrow.
Yihua Li,Xiubin Wang,Teresa Adams (2009). Ride service outsourcing for profit maximization.
Shu-Hsien Liao (2005). Technology management methodologies and applications: A literature review from 1995 to 2003.
Songhua Lin,Alyson Ma (2012). Outsourcing and productivity: Evidence from Korean data.
Elicia Maine,David Probert,Mike Ashby (2005). Investing in new materials: a tool for technology managers.
J Mendling,H Reijers,W Van Der Aalst (2010). Seven process modeling guidelines (7PMG).
Jürgen Mihm,Christoph Loch,Dennis Wilkinson,Bernardo Huberman (2010). Hierarchical Structure and Search in Complex Organizations.
John Mo (2009). System Support Engineering: The Foundation Knowledge for Performance Based Contracting.
O Mont (2002). Clarifying the concept of product–service system.
William Mullins,Antoinette Schoar (2013). Unknown Title.
Andy Neely (2002). Business Performance Measurement.
Irene Ng,Parry,Glenn,Duncan Mcfarlane,Paul Tasker (2010). Complex Engineering Service Systems.
Marekr Ogiela,Ogiela,Urszula (2014). Methodological Aspects of Information Sharing and Management in Organizations Secure Information Management Using Linguistic Threshold Approach.
Sauming Pang (2009). Successful Service Design for Telecommunications : A Comprehensive Guide to Design and Implementation Retrieved from.
Michael Pecht (2012). A Prognostics and Health Management for Information and Electronics-Rich Systems.
R Phaal,C Paterson,D Probert (1998). Technology management in manufacturing business: process and practical assessment.
Robert Phaal,Clare Farrukh,Probert,R David (2006). Technology management tools: concept, development and application.
João Pombinho,José Tribolet (2012). Service System Design and Engineering -A Value-Oriented Approach Based on DEMO.
Per Runeson,Martin Höst (2009). Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering.
Tomohiko Sakao,Gunilla Ölundh Sandström,Detlef Matzen (2009). Framing research for service orientation of manufacturers through PSS approaches.
Scott Sampson (2010). A unified Service Theory.
Andrew Spencer,Dimitrios Buhalis,Miguel Moital (2012). A hierarchical model of technology adoption for small owner-managed travel firms: An organizational decision-making and leadership perspective.
Neville Stanton,Paul Salmon,Guy Walker,Chris Baber,Daniel Jenkins (2012). Human Factors Methods.
Sultana,Masuda,Rahman,Sanaul Anisur,Chowdhury (2013). A Review of Performance Based Maintenance of Road Infrastructure by Contracting.
Stefano Tonchia,Luca Quagini (2010). Performance Measurement and Indicators.
Stefano Tonchia,Quagini,Luca (2010). Performance Measurement Systems Performance Measurement.
Ming Tseng,Lin Lang,Lin Ru-Jen,Chen Yuan-Hsu,Rong- Hui,Kimhua Tan (2014). Close-loop or open hierarchical structures in green supply chain management under uncertainty.
Steven Walczak (2005). Organizational knowledge management structure.
Yong Wang,Xiaolei Ma,Yunteng Lao,Yinhai Wang (2014). A fuzzy-based customer clustering approach with hierarchical structure for logistics network optimization.
Peter Wild (2010). A systemic framework for supporting cross-disciplinary efforts in services research.
Arch Woodside (2010). Bridging the chasm between survey and case study research: Research methods for achieving generalization, accuracy, and complexity.
Bradley Wright,S Pandey (2010). Transformational Leadership in the Public Sector: Does Structure Matter?.
Robert Yin (2011). Applications of case study research.
Robert Yin (2012). APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological..
Liu Yuan,K Hipel (2012). A Hierarchical Decision Model to Select Quality Control Strategies for a Complex Product.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mohammed Saif AL Saidi. 2014. \u201cAn Approach to Manage and Evaluate Engineering Asset Performance\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - G: Industrial Engineering GJRE-G Volume 14 (GJRE Volume 14 Issue G1).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJRE Volume 14 Issue G1

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

engineering asset management Evaluation Performance

Submission ReceivedDecember 16, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 5, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

March 27, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 132

Country: Australia

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - G: Industrial Engineering

Authors: Mohammed Saif AL Saidi, John P. T Mo (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 258

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4674

Total Downloads (simulated): 2396

Publish Date: 2014 03, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 41 views
Month 2: 50 views
Month 3: 36 views
Month 4: 59 views
Month 5: 65 views
Month 6: 41 views
Month 7: 39 views
Month 8: 51 views
Month 9: 41 views
Month 10: 17 views
Month 11: 26 views
Month 12: 19 views
Month 13: 32 views
Month 14: 13 views
Month 15: 31 views
Month 16: 17 views
Month 17: 45 views
Month 18: 41 views
Month 19: 18 views
Month 20: 39 views
Month 21: 18 views
Month 22: 30 views
Month 23: 24 views
Month 24: 32 views
Month 25: 41 views
Month 26: 42 views
Month 27: 11 views
Month 28: 16 views
Month 29: 44 views
Month 30: 30 views
Month 31: 11 views
Month 32: 26 views
Month 33: 30 views
Month 34: 29 views
Month 35: 22 views
Month 36: 45 views
Month 37: 39 views
Month 38: 31 views
Month 39: 36 views
Month 40: 32 views
Month 41: 34 views
Month 42: 29 views
Month 43: 23 views
Month 44: 33 views
Month 45: 39 views
Month 46: 14 views
Month 47: 30 views
Month 48: 31 views
Month 49: 41 views
Month 50: 24 views
Month 51: 30 views
Month 52: 33 views
Month 53: 16 views
Month 54: 26 views
Month 55: 33 views
Month 56: 25 views
Month 57: 25 views
Month 58: 32 views
Month 59: 31 views
Month 60: 32 views
Month 61: 28 views
Month 62: 31 views
Month 63: 26 views
Month 64: 17 views
Month 65: 33 views
Month 66: 24 views
Month 67: 34 views
Month 68: 43 views
Month 69: 50 views
Month 70: 30 views
Month 71: 30 views
Month 72: 37 views
Month 73: 30 views
Month 74: 25 views
Month 75: 28 views
Month 76: 11 views
Month 77: 23 views
Month 78: 40 views
Month 79: 22 views
Month 80: 28 views
Month 81: 24 views
Month 82: 30 views
Month 83: 20 views
Month 84: 36 views
Month 85: 38 views
Month 86: 39 views
Month 87: 23 views
Month 88: 18 views
Month 89: 26 views
Month 90: 44 views
Month 91: 31 views
Month 92: 29 views
Month 93: 42 views
Month 94: 19 views
Month 95: 19 views
Month 96: 25 views
Month 97: 14 views
Month 98: 11 views
Month 99: 30 views
Month 100: 23 views
Month 101: 45 views
Month 102: 36 views
Month 103: 21 views
Month 104: 21 views
Month 105: 22 views
Month 106: 46 views
Month 107: 15 views
Month 108: 22 views
Month 109: 32 views
Month 110: 43 views
Month 111: 30 views
Month 112: 42 views
Month 113: 15 views
Month 114: 14 views
Month 115: 22 views
Month 116: 27 views
Month 117: 33 views
Month 118: 26 views
Month 119: 26 views
Month 120: 42 views
Month 121: 21 views
Month 122: 23 views
Month 123: 46 views
Month 124: 20 views
Month 125: 31 views
Month 126: 20 views
Month 127: 27 views
Month 128: 36 views
Month 129: 24 views
Month 130: 35 views
Month 131: 23 views
Month 132: 38 views
Month 133: 36 views
Month 134: 38 views
Month 135: 28 views
Month 136: 40 views
Month 137: 41 views
Month 138: 43 views
Month 139: 63 views
Month 140: 22 views
Month 141: 13 views
Month 142: 43 views
Month 143: 35 views
Month 144: 48 views
Month 145: 49 views
Month 146: 45 views

Total Views: 4674

Total Downloads: 2396

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]