An Exponential Time Differencing Method for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Equation

1
Gentian Zavalani
Gentian Zavalani
1 Polytechnic University of Tirana/ Albania

Send Message

To: Author

GJRE Volume 14 Issue I1

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

9ZQOL

An Exponential Time Differencing Method for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Equation Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

The spectral methods offer very high spatial resolution for a wide range of nonlinear wave equations, so, for the best computational efficiency, it should be desirable to use also high order methods in time but without very strict restrictions on the step size by reason of numerical stability. In this paper we study the exponential time differencing fourth-order Runge-Kutta (ETDRK4) method; this scheme was derived by Cox and Matthews in [S.M. Cox, P.C. Matthews, Exponential time differencing for stiff systems, J. Comp. Phys. 176 (2002) 430-455] and was modified by Kassam and Trefethen in [A. Kassam, L.N. Trefethen, Fourth-order time stepping for stiff PDEs, SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 26 (2005Comp. 26 ( ) 1214Comp. 26 ( -1233]]. We compute its amplification factor and plot its stability region, which gives us an explanation of its good behavior for dissipative and dispersive problems. We apply this method to the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Equation obtaining excellent results.

24 Cites in Articles

References

  1. G Beylkin,J Keiser,L Vozovoi (1998). A New Class of Time Discretization Schemes for the Solution of Nonlinear PDEs.
  2. J Certaine The Solution of Ordinary Dierential Equations with Large Time Constants.
  3. A Friedli (1978). Verallgemeinerte Runge-Kutta Verfahren zur Loesung steifer Differentialgleichungssysteme.
  4. Syvert Norsett (1969). An A-stable modification of the Adams-Bashforth methods.
  5. C Klein (2008). Fourth Order Time-Stepping for Low Dispersion Korteweg-de Vries and Nonlinear Schro dinger Equations.
  6. A Kassam,L Trefethen (2005). Fourth-Order Time Stepping for Stiff.
  7. Dieter Armbruster,John Guckenheimer,Philip Holmes (1989). Kuramoto–Sivashinsky Dynamics on the Center–Unstable Manifold.
  8. Daniel Michelson (1986). Steady solutions of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation.
  9. B Nicolaenko,B Scheurer,R Temam (1985). Some global dynamical properties of the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equations: Nonlinear stability and attractors.
  10. R Burden,J Faires (2001). Numerical Analysis.
  11. M Hochbruck,A Ostermann (2005). Explicit Exponential Runge-Kutta Methods for Semi-linear Parabolic Problems.
  12. S Cox,P Matthews (2002). Exponential Time Differencing for Stiff Systems.
  13. A Kassam (2004). High Order Time stepping for Stiff Semi-Linear Partial Differential Equations.
  14. John Miles (1981). An Envelope Soliton Problem.
  15. John Boyd (2001). Chebyshev & Fourier Spectral Methods.
  16. C Canuto,M Hussain,A Quarteroni,T Zang (1988). Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics.
  17. B Fornberg (1998). A Practical Guide to Pseudospectral Methods.
  18. D Gottlieb,S Orszag (1977). Numerical Analysis of Spectral Methods: Theory and Applications.
  19. Lloyd Trefethen (2000). Spectral Methods in MATLAB.
  20. Allan Taflove,Korada Umashankar (1995). Users Code for the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method.
  21. Gregory Beylkin,James Keiser,Lev Vozovoi (1998). A New Class of Time Discretization Schemes for the Solution of Nonlinear PDEs.
  22. David Mott,Elaine Oran,Bram Van Leer (2000). A Quasi-Steady-State Solver for the Stiff Ordinary Differential Equations of Reaction Kinetics.
  23. Q Du,W Zhu (2005). Analysis and applications of the exponential time differencing schemes and their contour integration modifications.
  24. B Fornberg,T Driscoll (1999). A fast spectral algorithm for nonlinear wave equations with linear dispersion.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Gentian Zavalani. 2014. \u201cAn Exponential Time Differencing Method for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Equation\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - I: Numerical Methods GJRE-I Volume 14 (GJRE Volume 14 Issue I1): .

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

June 30, 2014

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4665
Total Downloads: 2278
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

The spectral methods offer very high spatial resolution for a wide range of nonlinear wave equations, so, for the best computational efficiency, it should be desirable to use also high order methods in time but without very strict restrictions on the step size by reason of numerical stability. In this paper we study the exponential time differencing fourth-order Runge-Kutta (ETDRK4) method; this scheme was derived by Cox and Matthews in [S.M. Cox, P.C. Matthews, Exponential time differencing for stiff systems, J. Comp. Phys. 176 (2002) 430-455] and was modified by Kassam and Trefethen in [A. Kassam, L.N. Trefethen, Fourth-order time stepping for stiff PDEs, SIAM J. Sci. Comp. 26 (2005Comp. 26 ( ) 1214Comp. 26 ( -1233]]. We compute its amplification factor and plot its stability region, which gives us an explanation of its good behavior for dissipative and dispersive problems. We apply this method to the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Equation obtaining excellent results.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

An Exponential Time Differencing Method for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky Equation

Gentian Zavalani
Gentian Zavalani Polytechnic University of Tirana/ Albania

Research Journals