An Investigation into Performance Appraisal System as an Effective Tool for Motivation

Isaac Ampong
Isaac Ampong
Chief Supt. Frank Abrokwa
Chief Supt. Frank Abrokwa

Send Message

To: Author

An Investigation into Performance Appraisal System as an Effective Tool for Motivation

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

3OI0E

An Investigation into Performance Appraisal System as an Effective Tool for Motivation Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

References

72 Cites in Article
  1. J Anderson (2002). Measuring human capital: performance appraisal effectiveness.
  2. M Armstrong,A Baron (2005). Beatson, Mark, (born 27 Sept. 1963), Chief Economist, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development, since 2012.
  3. Adiba Ash (1994). Participants' Reactions to Subordinate Appraisal of Managers: Results of a Pilot.
  4. D Balfour (1992). Impact of agency investments in the implementation of performance Appraisal.
  5. Sheila Bellamy,Clive Morley,Kim Watty (2003). Why Business Academics Remain in Australian Universities Despite Deteriorating Working Conditions and Reduced Job Satisfaction: An intellectual puzzle.
  6. H Bernardin,R Beatty (1984). Ways to improve the performance appraisal system 2: Alternative strategies for assessing and evaluating performance.
  7. Matt Bloom,George Milkovich,Atul Mitra (2003). International compensation: learning from how managers respond to variations in local host contexts.
  8. M Bloom,G Milkovich (1998). RELATIONSHIPS AMONG RISK, INCENTIVE PAY, AND ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE..
  9. Neil Boyd,K Kyle (2004). Expanding the View of Performance Appraisal by Introducing Social Justice Concerns.
  10. Michelle Brown,John Benson (2003). Rated to exhaustion? Reactions to performance appraisal processes.
  11. Pawan Budhwar,George Boyne (2004). Human resource management in the Indian public and private sectors: an empirical comparison.
  12. J Capko (2003). Five steps to a performance evaluation system available on.
  13. W Cascio (1987). Applied psychology in personnel management.
  14. Thierry Chevaillier (2001). French academics: Between the professions and the civil service.
  15. B Crawford (2003). Setting performance expectations for technical communicators.
  16. D Cooper,P Schindler (2001). Business research methods.
  17. D Daley (1990). The Civil Service Reform Act and performance appraisal: a research note on federal employee perceptions.
  18. Dennis Daley (1987). Merit Pay Enters With a Whimper: the Initial Federal Civil Service Reform Experience.
  19. D Devries,A Morrison,S Shullman,M Gerlach (1986). Performance appraisal on the line.
  20. Kevin Elliott,Dooyoung Shin (2002). Student Satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept.
  21. Clive Fletcher,Elissa Perry (2004). Performance Appraisal and Feedback: A Consideration of National Culture and a Review of Contemporary Research and Future Trends.
  22. C Fletcher (2001). Performance appraisal and management: The developing research Agenda.
  23. C Fletcher,R Williams (1996). Performance management, job satisfaction and organisational commitment.
  24. Gerald Gabris (1986). Can Merit Pay Systems Avoid Creating Discord Between Supervisors and Subordinates?: Another Uneasy Look At Performance Appraisal.
  25. Terry Gatfield,Michelle Barker,Peter Graham (1999). Measuring Student Quality Variables and the Implications for Management Practices in Higher Education Institutions: an Australian and international student perspective.
  26. B Gerhart,G Milkovich (1990). Organisational differences in managerial compensation and financial performance.
  27. T Gillen (2007). Performance management and appraisal.
  28. P Goodge (2005). How to link 360 degree feedback and appraisal.
  29. Jerald Greenberg (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations..
  30. Dick Grote (2000). Public Sector Organizations.
  31. C Hakim,Unwin Allen,D Hartog,P Boselie,J Paauwe (1982). Performance management: a model and research agenda.
  32. Cheryl Haslam,Alan Bryman,Adrian Webb (1992). The introduction of university staff appraisal.
  33. R Heneman,E (1992). Merit Pay. Reading: Addison-Wesley Higgins.
  34. D Houston,M Rees (1999). Developing a quality management system for a postgraduate education programme: a case study.
  35. S Hutchinson,J Purcell (2003). Bringing practices to life: The vital role of front line managers.
  36. R Ihenacho (2005). Chapter 5: Networks in Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in Nigeria -195.
  37. E Du Porte (1920). The muscular system of gryllus assimilis fabr. (Pennsylvanicus Burm.) a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in McGill University /.
  38. T Krein (1990). Performance reviews that rate an "A.
  39. G Latham,K Wexley,Addison-Wesley,E Lawler,Mohrman (1981). Increasing productivity through performance appraisal.
  40. H Locher,K Teel (1988). Appraisal trends.
  41. Clinton Longenecker,Henry Sims,Dennis Gioia (1987). Behind the Mask: The Politics of Employee Appraisal.
  42. Clinton Longenecker,Patrick Liverpool,Kathlyn Wilson (1988). An assessment of manager/subordinate perceptions of performance appraisal effectiveness.
  43. Clinton O. Longenecker,Laurence S. Fink,Sheri Caldwell (1999). Current U.S. trends in formal performance appraisal: practices and opportunities – Part One.
  44. B Mani (2002). Performance appraisal systems, productivity, and motivation: a case Study.
  45. J Margulies,T Murphy (2004). Figure 3.11. Performance appraisals (2004, 2012-2015).
  46. Janet Marler,George Milkovich (2002). ORGANIZATION-WIDE BROAD-BASED INCENTIVES: RATIONAL THEORY AND EVIDENCE..
  47. Bernard Maroney,M Buckely (1992). Does Research in Performance Appraisal Influence the Practice of Performance Appraisal? Regretfully Not!.
  48. Patrick Mccarthy,Thomas Keefe (1999). A Measure of Staff Perceptions of Quality-Oriented Organizational Performance: Initial Development and Internal Consistency.
  49. J Mchale (2003). Performance appraisal: getting it right.
  50. Ian Mcnay (1997). The Regional Dimension in Strategic Planning of Higher Education.
  51. Eastern Europe ; Mergen,E Grant,D Widrick,S (2000). Quality management applied to higher Education.
  52. H Meyer,E Kay,J French (1965). Split roles in performance appraisal.
  53. A Mohrman,S Resnick-West,E Lawler (1989). Designing performance appraisal system.
  54. Philip Morgan,Nigel Allington (2002). Has the Public Sector Retained its 'Model Employer' Status?.
  55. A Mylonas (2004). Case study on performance appraisal system in the Cyprus Civil Service.
  56. J Newman,G Milkovich (1990). Procedural justice challenges in compensation: eliminating the fairness gap.
  57. Michael Pratt,Dimitri Margaritis,David Coy (1999). Developing a Research Culture in a University Faculty.
  58. H Pratt (1991). Principles of effective performance management.
  59. Gary Roberts (1994). Barriers to Municipal Government Performance Appraisal Systems: Evidence from a Survey of Municipal Personnel Administrators.
  60. M Saunders,P Lewis,A Thornhill (2007). Research methods for business students.
  61. S Scott (1999). The academic as service provider: is the customer always right?.
  62. Mark Sinclair (2003). Three futures for university provision: the social justice market, state capitalism and private for-profit universities.
  63. Singh (2007). Where are performance appraisals headed? The debate from a business perspective.
  64. K Sisson (1994). Personnel management: a comprehensive guide to theory and practice in Britain.
  65. B Smith,J Hornsby,R Shirmeyer (1996). Managerial issues in expert system implementation Richard D. Hauser Jr. and Frederick J. Hebert, SAM Advanced Management Journal (Winter 1992), pp. 10–15.
  66. Frank Stilwell (2003). Higher Education, Commercial Criteria and Economic Incentives.
  67. Frederick Thayer (1978). The President's Management "Reforms:" Theory X Triumphant.
  68. Barbara Townley (1999). Practical Reason and Performance Appraisal.
  69. B Townley (1997). The Institutional logic of performance appraisal.
  70. K Türk,T Roolaht (2000). A comparison of the appraisal systems and appraisal-compensation interlinks used by Estonian public and private universities.
  71. V Vroom,John Wiley,& Sons Willis,T (1964). Total quality management and higher education: the employers' perspective.
  72. D Wright (1985). The split role of performance appraisal.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Isaac Ampong. 2020. \u201cAn Investigation into Performance Appraisal System as an Effective Tool for Motivation\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 20 (GJMBR Volume 20 Issue A16).

Download Citation

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
November 27, 2020

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2229
Total Downloads: 1053
2026 Trends
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

An Investigation into Performance Appraisal System as an Effective Tool for Motivation

Isaac Ampong
Isaac Ampong
Chief Supt. Frank Abrokwa
Chief Supt. Frank Abrokwa

Research Journals