An Open Letter to the International Mathematics Union on the Errors in the 1982 and 1990 Fields Medal Awards

An Open Letter to the International Mathematics Union on the Errors in the 1982 and 1990 Fields Medal Awards

c._y._lo

Contact

C. Y. Lo

Contact

An Open Letter to the International Mathematics Union on the Errors in the 1982 and 1990 Fields Medal Awards

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

7C43S

An Open Letter to the International Mathematics Union on the Errors in the 1982 and 1990 Fields Medal Awards Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Since Einstein’s theory is proven to be not self-consistent and incomplete, the positive mass theorem of S. T. Yau, which implied Einstein’s theory would be consistent and stable is clearly incorrect. Apparently, Yau did not know that the Einstein equation does not have any bounded dynamic solution because he has never attempted to obtain one. Consequently, Yau was not aware that his assumption has already excluded the dynamic solutions. This error of Yau is due to that he does not understand physics. This error in the Fields Medal Awards is due to that those mathematicians responsible for the awards do not understand physics, and have a blind faith on Einstein. Thus, to remove the erroneous influence of Yau, it is desirable for the International Mathematics Union to correct her mistakes.

References

21 Cites in Article

Reference Format

C Lo (2015). Incompleteness of General Relativity, Einstein's Errors, and Related Experiments-- American Physical Society March meeting, Z23 5, 2015 --.
C Lo Undergraduate Research that shows Einstein incorrect.
C Lo (2015). Incompleteness of General Relativity, Einstein's Errors, and Related Experiments --APS March meeting, Z23 5.
C Lo (1995). Einstein's Radiation Formula and Modifications to the Einstein Equation.
D Christodoulou,S Klainerman (1993). The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Minkowski Space.
C Lo (2000). The Question of Validity of the "Dynamic Solutions" Constructed by Christodoulou and Klainerman.
C Lo (2012). Comments on the 2011 Shaw Prize in Mathematical Sciences, --an analysis of collectively formed errors in physics.
C Misner,K Thorne,J Wheeler (1973). Gravitation.
C Lo (2013). Errors of the Wheeler School, the Distortions to General Relativity and the Damage to Education in MIT Open Courses in Physics.
C Lo (2013). Rectification of General Relativity, Experimental Verifications, and Errors of the Wheeler School.
C Lo (2013). On the Nobel Prize in Physics, Controversies and Influences.
G Hooft (1999). A Confrontation with Infinity.
C Lo (2010). The Principle of Causality and Einstein's requirement for weak Gravity, versus Einstein's Covariance Principle.
C Lo (2011). On physical invalidity of the “cylindrical symmetric waves” of ‘t Hooft.
C Lo (2016). Comments on the 2016 Award of APS Medal for Exceptional Achievement in Research.
A Pais (1996). Subtle is the Lord.
C Lo (2016). The observable temperature dependence of gravitation.
C Lo (2000). On Incompatibility of Gravitational Radiation with the 1915 Einstein Equation.
W Pauli (1971). Theory of Relativity.
J Norton (1989). What was Einstein's Principle of Equivalence?.
(2007). Macdonald, Ian Wilson, (28 May 1907–8 Jan. 1989), CA.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

c._y._lo. 2017. \u201cAn Open Letter to the International Mathematics Union on the Errors in the 1982 and 1990 Fields Medal Awards\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - F: Mathematics & Decision GJSFR-F Volume 16 (GJSFR Volume 16 Issue F6): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJSFR Volume 16 Issue F6
Pg. 1- 4

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJSFR-F Classification: MSC 2010: 00A05

Submission ReceivedDecember 6, 2016
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2017
Published January 17, 2017

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 19, 2017

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 101

Country: Unknown

Subject: Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - F: Mathematics & Decision

Authors: C. Y. Lo (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 143

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3475

Total Downloads (simulated): 1796

Publish Date: 2017 01, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 64 views
Month 2: 62 views
Month 3: 37 views
Month 4: 40 views
Month 5: 48 views
Month 6: 46 views
Month 7: 41 views
Month 8: 32 views
Month 9: 41 views
Month 10: 24 views
Month 11: 17 views
Month 12: 25 views
Month 13: 27 views
Month 14: 13 views
Month 15: 25 views
Month 16: 31 views
Month 17: 41 views
Month 18: 13 views
Month 19: 27 views
Month 20: 38 views
Month 21: 35 views
Month 22: 32 views
Month 23: 11 views
Month 24: 22 views
Month 25: 14 views
Month 26: 38 views
Month 27: 15 views
Month 28: 31 views
Month 29: 22 views
Month 30: 18 views
Month 31: 26 views
Month 32: 36 views
Month 33: 34 views
Month 34: 25 views
Month 35: 24 views
Month 36: 32 views
Month 37: 43 views
Month 38: 27 views
Month 39: 27 views
Month 40: 13 views
Month 41: 34 views
Month 42: 25 views
Month 43: 37 views
Month 44: 34 views
Month 45: 29 views
Month 46: 32 views
Month 47: 13 views
Month 48: 18 views
Month 49: 23 views
Month 50: 31 views
Month 51: 24 views
Month 52: 40 views
Month 53: 41 views
Month 54: 16 views
Month 55: 40 views
Month 56: 37 views
Month 57: 30 views
Month 58: 32 views
Month 59: 23 views
Month 60: 35 views
Month 61: 29 views
Month 62: 27 views
Month 63: 12 views
Month 64: 28 views
Month 65: 35 views
Month 66: 34 views
Month 67: 34 views
Month 68: 26 views
Month 69: 27 views
Month 70: 24 views
Month 71: 30 views
Month 72: 43 views
Month 73: 35 views
Month 74: 39 views
Month 75: 41 views
Month 76: 43 views
Month 77: 15 views
Month 78: 36 views
Month 79: 31 views
Month 80: 37 views
Month 81: 42 views
Month 82: 17 views
Month 83: 38 views
Month 84: 39 views
Month 85: 19 views
Month 86: 11 views
Month 87: 32 views
Month 88: 25 views
Month 89: 44 views
Month 90: 39 views
Month 91: 36 views
Month 92: 32 views
Month 93: 42 views
Month 94: 32 views
Month 95: 35 views
Month 96: 33 views
Month 97: 23 views
Month 98: 27 views
Month 99: 19 views
Month 100: 23 views
Month 101: 21 views
Month 102: 47 views
Month 103: 20 views
Month 104: 22 views
Month 105: 23 views
Month 106: 22 views
Month 107: 27 views
Month 108: 26 views
Month 109: 14 views
Month 110: 52 views
Month 111: 56 views

Total Views: 3475

Total Downloads: 1796

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]