Analysis of Distance Measures in Content based Image Retrieval

Anjali Batra; Dr. Meenakshi Sharma

Analysis of Distance Measures in Content based Image Retrieval

Anjali Batra * §

Contact

Dr. Meenakshi Sharma ‡

Contact

§ HCTM TECHNICAL CAMPUS, KAITHAL, HARYANA, INDIA (136027)

‡ Kurukshetra University

Analysis of Distance Measures in Content based Image Retrieval

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

0358W

Analysis of Distance Measures in Content based Image Retrieval Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

Content predicated image retrieval (CBIR) provides an efficacious way to probe the images from the databases. The feature extraction and homogeneous attribute measures are the two key parameters for retrieval performance. A homogeneous attribute measure plays a paramount role in image retrieval. This paper compares six different distance metrics such as Euclidean, Manhattan, Canberra, Bray-Curtis, Square chord, Square chi-squared distances to find the best kindred attribute measure for image retrieval. Utilizing pyramid structured wavelet decomposition, energy levels are calculated. These energy levels are compared by calculating distance between query image and database images utilizing above mentioned seven different kindred attribute metrics. A sizably voluminous image database from Brodatz album is utilized for retrieval purport. Experimental results shows the preponderating of Canberra, Bray-Curtis, Square chord, and Square Chi-squared distances over the conventional Euclidean and Manhattan distances.

References

17 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. H Flickner,W Sawhney,J Niblack,Q Ashley,B Huang,Dom (1995). Query by Image and Video Content: The QBIC System. IEEE Computer, 28(9)
2. A Natsev,R Rastogi,K Shim (1999). WALRUS: A Similarity Retrieval Algorithm for Image Databases. SIGMOD Record, 28(2), 395-406.
3. Carlton Niblack,Ron Barber,Will Equitz,Myron Flickner,Eduardo Glasman,Dragutin Petkovic,Peter Yanker,Christos Faloutsos,Gabriel Taubin (1908). QBIC project: querying images by content, using color, texture, and shape. SPIE Proceedings, 1908, 173-187.
4. A Smeulders,M Worring,S Santini,A Gupta,R Jain (2000). Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22(12), 1349-1380.
5. A Majumdar,A Sural,S (2003). Performance Comparison of distance metrics in content-based Image Retrieval applications. Proc. of Internat. Conf. on Information Technology, 159-164.
6. A Jain,A Vailaya (1996). Image Retrieval using Color and Shape. Pattern Recognition, 29(8), 1233-1244.
7. C Carson,M Thomas,S Belongie,J Hellerstein,J Malik (1999). Blobworld: A System for Region-Based Image Indexing and Retrieval. Proc. Visual Information Systems, 509-516.
8. Megha Gauri Deshpande,Borse (2011). Image Retrieval with the use of different color spaces and the texture feature. International Conference on Software and Computer Applications, 9, 273-278.
9. John Smith,Shih-Fu Chang (1996). VisualSEEk. Proceedings of the fourth ACM international conference on Multimedia - MULTIMEDIA '96, 87-98.
10. J Hafner,H Sawhney,W Equitz,M Flickner,W Niblack (1995). Efficient color histogram indexing for quadratic form distance functions. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 17(7), 729-736.
11. C Fuh,S Cho,K Essig (2000). Hierarchical Color Image Region Segmentation for Content-Based Image Retrieval System. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 9(1), 156-162.
12. Padmashri Suresh,R Sundaram,Aravindhan Arumugam (2008). Feature Extraction in Compressed Domain for Content Based Image Retrieval. 2008 International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 190-194.
13. S Selvarajah,S R Kodituwakku (2011). Analysis and Comparison of Texture Features for Content Based Image Retrieval. International Journal of Latest Trends in Computing, 2(1), 108-113.
14. Ying Liu,Dengsheng Zhang,Guojun Lu,Wei-Ying Ma (2007). A survey of content-based image retrieval with high-level semantics. Pattern Recognition, 40(1), 262-282.
15. P Hiremath,J Pujari (2007). Based Image Retrieval Using Color, Texture and Shape Features. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Advanced Computing and
16. C Bai (2012). Color Textured Image Retrieval By Combining Texture and Color Features. European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO-2012
17. Hee-Jung Bae,Sung-Hwan Jung (1997). Image retrieval Using texture based on dct. International conference on Information, communications and signal processing ICICS 97, 9-12.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Anjali Batra, Dr. Meenakshi Sharma. 2014. "Analysis of Distance Measures in Content based Image Retrieval". Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - G: Interdisciplinary GJCST-G Volume 14 (GJCST Volume 14 Issue G2).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJCST Volume 14 Issue G2

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

CBIR chebychev distance cityblock distance Confusion matrix distance metrics euclidean distance mahalanobis distance manhattan distance

Classification

I.4.10

Submission ReceivedDecember 7, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 3, 2014
Published September 18, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 18, 2014

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 107

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - G: Interdisciplinary

Authors: Dr. Meenakshi Sharma, Anjali Batra (PhD/Dr. count: 1)

View Count (all-time): 672

Total Views (Real + Logic): 3678

Total Downloads (simulated): 240

Publish Date: 2014 01, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 32 views
Month 2: 52 views
Month 3: 45 views
Month 4: 58 views
Month 5: 51 views
Month 6: 43 views
Month 7: 48 views
Month 8: 40 views
Month 9: 34 views
Month 10: 21 views
Month 11: 22 views
Month 12: 22 views
Month 13: 45 views
Month 14: 37 views
Month 15: 35 views
Month 16: 19 views
Month 17: 43 views
Month 18: 43 views
Month 19: 32 views
Month 20: 27 views
Month 21: 35 views
Month 22: 27 views
Month 23: 31 views
Month 24: 40 views
Month 25: 39 views
Month 26: 32 views
Month 27: 30 views
Month 28: 21 views
Month 29: 25 views
Month 30: 30 views
Month 31: 31 views
Month 32: 34 views
Month 33: 46 views
Month 34: 34 views
Month 35: 30 views
Month 36: 31 views
Month 37: 35 views
Month 38: 46 views
Month 39: 34 views
Month 40: 32 views
Month 41: 27 views
Month 42: 27 views
Month 43: 27 views
Month 44: 23 views
Month 45: 31 views
Month 46: 40 views
Month 47: 41 views
Month 48: 36 views
Month 49: 28 views
Month 50: 34 views
Month 51: 28 views
Month 52: 34 views
Month 53: 39 views
Month 54: 46 views
Month 55: 27 views
Month 56: 29 views
Month 57: 22 views
Month 58: 28 views
Month 59: 33 views
Month 60: 26 views
Month 61: 30 views
Month 62: 34 views
Month 63: 46 views
Month 64: 30 views
Month 65: 39 views
Month 66: 23 views
Month 67: 39 views
Month 68: 33 views
Month 69: 28 views
Month 70: 26 views
Month 71: 42 views
Month 72: 16 views
Month 73: 11 views
Month 74: 21 views
Month 75: 28 views
Month 76: 35 views
Month 77: 27 views
Month 78: 23 views
Month 79: 34 views
Month 80: 19 views
Month 81: 47 views
Month 82: 21 views
Month 83: 41 views
Month 84: 29 views
Month 85: 43 views
Month 86: 15 views
Month 87: 39 views
Month 88: 34 views
Month 89: 26 views
Month 90: 34 views
Month 91: 38 views
Month 92: 33 views
Month 93: 44 views
Month 94: 33 views
Month 95: 33 views
Month 96: 20 views
Month 97: 47 views
Month 98: 50 views
Month 99: 37 views
Month 100: 29 views
Month 101: 35 views
Month 102: 43 views
Month 103: 31 views
Month 104: 46 views
Month 105: 18 views
Month 106: 47 views
Month 107: 36 views
Month 108: 30 views
Month 109: 48 views
Month 110: 28 views
Month 111: 26 views
Month 112: 43 views
Month 113: 34 views
Month 114: 21 views
Month 115: 16 views
Month 116: 43 views
Month 117: 36 views
Month 118: 17 views
Month 119: 47 views
Month 120: 28 views
Month 121: 46 views
Month 122: 29 views
Month 123: 26 views
Month 124: 26 views
Month 125: 24 views
Month 126: 18 views
Month 127: 23 views
Month 128: 44 views
Month 129: 32 views
Month 130: 24 views
Month 131: 21 views
Month 132: 28 views
Month 133: 39 views
Month 134: 44 views
Month 135: 24 views
Month 136: 17 views
Month 137: 54 views
Month 138: 52 views
Month 139: 64 views
Month 140: 34 views
Month 141: 59 views
Month 142: 63 views
Month 143: 17 views
Month 144: 20 views
Month 145: 36 views
Month 146: 19 views
Month 147: 14 views
Month 148: 23 views
Month 149: 16 views
Month 150: 53 views
Month 151: 54 views
Month 152: 50 views
Month 153: 49 views
Month 154: 43 views

Total Views: 3.7K

Total Downloads: 240

All Trends