Analysis Status Quo and Strategies of Medical Ethics Evaluation System of Public Hospitals in China

1
Wang Yu
Wang Yu
2
Yu Wang
Yu Wang Research associate
3
Qing Tu
Qing Tu
4
Li Huang
Li Huang
1 Chongqing Medical University

Send Message

To: Author

GJMBR Volume 15 Issue A8

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

97H39

Analysis Status Quo and Strategies of Medical Ethics Evaluation System of Public Hospitals in China Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Ethics, an essential dimension of human research, is considered both as discipline and practice. For clinical research, ethically justified criteria for the design, conduct, and review of clinical investigation can be identified by obligations to both the researcher and human subject. Medical practitioners are expected to not only have the skills and knowledge relevant to their field but also with the ethical and legal expectations that arise out of the standard practices. A highest level of knowledge, awareness and understanding of ethics are expected in medical practice as it is the foundation of sound healthcare delivery system. Though literatures review, status quos of medical evaluation system are found in China. Although Chinese government attach extreme important to ethics evaluation, medical ethics education and building can be value by China. Negative List System is used in health management field firstly. Some suggestions are given to government to improve development of medical ethics evaluation system.

18 Cites in Articles

References

  1. J Wisely (2008). Research ethics committees.
  2. M Martín-Arribas,I Rodríguez-Lozano,J Arias-Díaz (2012). Ethical review of research protocols: experience of a research ethics committee.
  3. M Mcdonald,A Townsend,S Cox,N Paterson,D Lafrenière (2008). Trust in health research relationships: accounts of human subjects.
  4. Jaya Kaushik,Manish Narang,Nupur Agarwal (2010). Informed consent in pediatric practice.
  5. Kamela Scott,David Chesire,J Burns,Michael Nussbaum (2012). Proficiency of Surgical Faculty and Residents with Ethical Dilemmas: Is Modeling Enough?.
  6. J Cohen,I Marcoux,J Bilsen,P Deboosere,G Van Der Wal,L Deliens (2006). European public acceptance of euthanasia: sociodemographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries.
  7. G Ravindran (2008). Medical ethics education in India.
  8. Laura Londra,Edward Wallach,Yulian Zhao (2014). Assisted reproduction: Ethical and legal issues.
  9. Simon Tamayo-Velázquez,M Barrio-Cantalejo,I (2008). Advance directives in Spain. Perspectives from a medical bioethicist approach.
  10. Luke Brewster,Dan Hall,Raymond Joehl (2011). Assessing Residents in Surgical Ethics: We Do It a Lot; We Only Know a Little.
  11. M Baily (2011). Futility, autonomy, and cost in end-of-life care.
  12. C Geppert,W Shelton (2012). A comparison of general medical and clinical ethics consultations: what can we learn from each other?.
  13. Volnei Garrafa,Jan Solbakk,Susana Vidal,Claudio Lorenzo (2010). Between the needy and the greedy: the quest for a just and fair ethics of clinical research.
  14. Elliot Tapper,Christian Vercler,Deborah Cruze,William Sexson (2010). Ethics Consultation at a Large Urban Public Teaching Hospital.
  15. E Tapper (2013). Consults for conflict: the history of ethics consultation.
  16. Mohamed Ghanem,M Kassem,A (2012). Knowledge, perceptions and practices towards medical ethics among physician residents of University of Alexandria Hospitals, Egypt.
  17. J Luce (2013). Chronic disorders of consciousness following coma.
  18. Y Zhou (2014). The negative list in foreign investment access.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Wang Yu. 2015. \u201cAnalysis Status Quo and Strategies of Medical Ethics Evaluation System of Public Hospitals in China\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 15 (GJMBR Volume 15 Issue A8): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJMBR Volume 15 Issue A8
Pg. 57- 60
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-A Classification: JEL Code: M19
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

September 2, 2015

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4090
Total Downloads: 1915
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

Ethics, an essential dimension of human research, is considered both as discipline and practice. For clinical research, ethically justified criteria for the design, conduct, and review of clinical investigation can be identified by obligations to both the researcher and human subject. Medical practitioners are expected to not only have the skills and knowledge relevant to their field but also with the ethical and legal expectations that arise out of the standard practices. A highest level of knowledge, awareness and understanding of ethics are expected in medical practice as it is the foundation of sound healthcare delivery system. Though literatures review, status quos of medical evaluation system are found in China. Although Chinese government attach extreme important to ethics evaluation, medical ethics education and building can be value by China. Negative List System is used in health management field firstly. Some suggestions are given to government to improve development of medical ethics evaluation system.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Analysis Status Quo and Strategies of Medical Ethics Evaluation System of Public Hospitals in China

Yu Wang
Yu Wang
Qing Tu
Qing Tu
Li Huang
Li Huang

Research Journals