Application of a Physically based Model for Terrain Stability Mapping in in North of Iran

Application of a Physically based Model for Terrain Stability Mapping in in North of Iran

Mehrdad Safaei

Contact

Husaini Omar

Contact

Zenoddin B M Yousof

Contact

Alireza Motevalli

Contact

α Universiti Putra Malaysia

Application of a Physically based Model for Terrain Stability Mapping in in North of Iran

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

6F0RU

Application of a Physically based Model for Terrain Stability Mapping in in North of Iran Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

In This paper, we studied of the landslide occurred in the northern of Iran in the southern Sari in the road of Kiasar using a physically based model has been named SHALSTAB and landslide instability mapping of study area is determined. The Aim of This paper is to determine the Effectiveness of road construction in the landslide occurred. The model runs to base on geotechnical data extracted from laboratory testing on the 15 landslide points. A landslide inventory map along the road Kiasar, including 63 landslide points was prepared for study area. The results of field investigations, analyzing geological data, laboratory tests and running model indicated that 88% of landslides are in the unstable region which represents a successful prediction of running model in this area and also according to this model, 25/9 percent of the areas were located as stable. The results established that the SHALSTAB model is also a valuable model for prediction of landslide prone zone for the occurrence of shallow landslides in study area.

References

22 Cites in Article

Reference Format

M Borga,G Dalla Fontana,D Da Ros,L Marchi (1998). Shallow landslide hazard assessment using a physically based model and digital elevation data.
M Casadei,W Dietrich,N Miller (2003). Testing a model for predicting the timing and location of shallow landslide initiation in soil‐mantled landscapes.
F Cervi (2010). Comparing predictive capability of statistical and deterministic methods for landslide susceptibility mapping: a case study in the northern Apennines (Reggio Emilia Province,Italy. landslies.
L Claessens (2005). DEM resolutions effects on shallowlandslide hazard and soil redistributionmodeling.
L Claessens,J Schoorl,A Veldkamp (2007). Modelling the location of shallow landslides and their effects on.
William Dietrich,Dino Bellugi,Raphael Real De Asua (2001). Validation of the Shallow Landslide Model, SHALSTAB, for forest management.
William Dietrich,Robert Reiss,Mei‐ling Hsu,David Montgomery (1995). A process‐based model for colluvial soil depth and shallow landsliding using digital elevation data.
William Dietrich,Cathy Wilson,David Montgomery,James Mckean (1993). Analysis of Erosion Thresholds, Channel Networks, and Landscape Morphology Using a Digital Terrain Model.
William Dietrich,Cathy Wilson,David Montgomery,James Mckean,Romy Bauer (1992). Erosion thresholds and land surface morphology.
David Montgomery,William Dietrich (1988). Where do channels begin?.
D Montgomery,W Dietrich (1989). Source Areas, Drainage Density and Channel Initiation.
D Montgomery,W Dietrich (1994). A physically based model for the topographic control of shallow land sliding.
D Montgomery,K Schmidt,H Greenberg,W Dietrich (2000). Forest clearing and regional land sliding.
R Pack (1995). Statistically-based terrain stability mapping methodology for the Kamloops Forest Region, British Columbia.
R Pack,D Tarboton,C Goodwin (2001). A stability index approach to terrain stability hazard mapping SINMAP User's Manual.
Silvia Rafaelli,David Montgomery,Harvey Greenberg (2001). A comparison of thematic mapping of erosional intensity to GIS-driven process models in an Andean drainage basin.
M Rezaeian (2008). Coupled tectonics, erosion and climate in the Alborz Mountains, Iran.
M Safaei,H Omar,Z Yousof,G Vahed (2010). Review for "Geospatial Assessment and Mapping Landslide Susceptibility for the Garo Hills Division, Meghalaya, India".
Monia Santini,Salvatore Grimaldi,Fernando Nardi,Andrea Petroselli,Maria Rulli (2009). Pre-processing algorithms and landslide modelling on remotely sensed DEMs.
Roy Sidle (1992). A theoretical model of the effects of timber harvesting on slope stability.
R Sidle,A Pearce,C O'loughlin (1985). Hillslope Stability and Land Use.
Weimin Wu,Roy Sidle (1995). A Distributed Slope Stability Model for Steep Forested Basins.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Mehrdad Safaei. 2013. \u201cApplication of a Physically based Model for Terrain Stability Mapping in in North of Iran\u201d. Global Journal of Research in Engineering - J: General Engineering GJRE-J Volume 13 (GJRE Volume 13 Issue J2): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJRE Volume 13 Issue J2
Pg. 53- 12

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjre

Print ISSN 0975-5861

e-ISSN 2249-4596

Keywords

landslide road SHALSTAB stability mapping

Submission ReceivedDecember 13, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2013
Published January 15, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

July 31, 2013

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 104

Country: Malaysia

Subject: Global Journal of Research in Engineering - J: General Engineering

Authors: Mehrdad Safaei, Husaini Omar, Zenoddin B M Yousof, Alireza Motevalli (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 176

Total Views (Real + Logic): 5035

Total Downloads (simulated): 2547

Publish Date: 2013 07, Wed

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 60 views
Month 2: 33 views
Month 3: 39 views
Month 4: 34 views
Month 5: 48 views
Month 6: 27 views
Month 7: 48 views
Month 8: 44 views
Month 9: 31 views
Month 10: 37 views
Month 11: 23 views
Month 12: 14 views
Month 13: 29 views
Month 14: 35 views
Month 15: 29 views
Month 16: 30 views
Month 17: 43 views
Month 18: 30 views
Month 19: 29 views
Month 20: 12 views
Month 21: 13 views
Month 22: 37 views
Month 23: 46 views
Month 24: 43 views
Month 25: 31 views
Month 26: 30 views
Month 27: 41 views
Month 28: 34 views
Month 29: 41 views
Month 30: 15 views
Month 31: 35 views
Month 32: 38 views
Month 33: 27 views
Month 34: 46 views
Month 35: 43 views
Month 36: 31 views
Month 37: 34 views
Month 38: 46 views
Month 39: 27 views
Month 40: 37 views
Month 41: 34 views
Month 42: 37 views
Month 43: 23 views
Month 44: 31 views
Month 45: 30 views
Month 46: 29 views
Month 47: 15 views
Month 48: 12 views
Month 49: 34 views
Month 50: 32 views
Month 51: 19 views
Month 52: 42 views
Month 53: 36 views
Month 54: 30 views
Month 55: 42 views
Month 56: 20 views
Month 57: 40 views
Month 58: 37 views
Month 59: 24 views
Month 60: 37 views
Month 61: 22 views
Month 62: 30 views
Month 63: 24 views
Month 64: 27 views
Month 65: 32 views
Month 66: 35 views
Month 67: 47 views
Month 68: 31 views
Month 69: 34 views
Month 70: 39 views
Month 71: 30 views
Month 72: 31 views
Month 73: 15 views
Month 74: 35 views
Month 75: 35 views
Month 76: 39 views
Month 77: 25 views
Month 78: 38 views
Month 79: 35 views
Month 80: 46 views
Month 81: 34 views
Month 82: 20 views
Month 83: 34 views
Month 84: 29 views
Month 85: 17 views
Month 86: 38 views
Month 87: 31 views
Month 88: 29 views
Month 89: 30 views
Month 90: 20 views
Month 91: 30 views
Month 92: 34 views
Month 93: 24 views
Month 94: 39 views
Month 95: 21 views
Month 96: 27 views
Month 97: 23 views
Month 98: 40 views
Month 99: 34 views
Month 100: 44 views
Month 101: 40 views
Month 102: 27 views
Month 103: 28 views
Month 104: 26 views
Month 105: 20 views
Month 106: 45 views
Month 107: 24 views
Month 108: 30 views
Month 109: 37 views
Month 110: 27 views
Month 111: 28 views
Month 112: 35 views
Month 113: 33 views
Month 114: 36 views
Month 115: 33 views
Month 116: 23 views
Month 117: 20 views
Month 118: 27 views
Month 119: 23 views
Month 120: 40 views
Month 121: 24 views
Month 122: 33 views
Month 123: 20 views
Month 124: 33 views
Month 125: 25 views
Month 126: 42 views
Month 127: 37 views
Month 128: 35 views
Month 129: 27 views
Month 130: 40 views
Month 131: 38 views
Month 132: 22 views
Month 133: 38 views
Month 134: 33 views
Month 135: 45 views
Month 136: 34 views
Month 137: 24 views
Month 138: 16 views
Month 139: 24 views
Month 140: 29 views
Month 141: 30 views
Month 142: 35 views
Month 143: 33 views
Month 144: 20 views
Month 145: 25 views
Month 146: 24 views
Month 147: 33 views
Month 148: 35 views
Month 149: 25 views
Month 150: 36 views
Month 151: 27 views
Month 152: 53 views
Month 153: 47 views
Month 154: 30 views

Total Views: 5035

Total Downloads: 2547

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]