Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Prioritize of Concrete Pavement

Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Prioritize of Concrete Pavement

Alireza Arab Ameri

Contact

S.A Nourozi

Contact

A.R Shariati.

Contact

University of Isfahan

Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Prioritize of Concrete Pavement

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

7C446

Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Prioritize of Concrete Pavement Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) is a structured technique for dealing with complex decisions that was developed by Thomas L. Saaty in the 1980 year. It provides a comprehensive and rational framework for structuring a decision problem, for representing and quantifying its elements, for relating those elements to overall goals, and for evaluating alternative solutions. The base of this model is comparing variables by pair wise by Matrix relationship. In this way, pair wise of the effective variables on the concrete Pavement were considered and based on relative weights the output was extent.

References

39 Cites in Article

Reference Format

J Barzilai,W Cook,B Golany (1987). Consistent weights for judgment matrices of the relative importance of alternatives.
J Barzilai,F Lootsma (1997). Power Relations and Group Aggregation in the Multiplicative AHP and SMART.
T Belton,Gear (1983). on a shortcoming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies.
V Belton,T Gear (1985). The legitimacy of rank reversal -a comment.
L Meade,A Presley (2002). R&D Project selection using the analytic network process.
James Dyer (1990). A Clarification of “Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process”.
Ernest Forman (1990). AHP Is Intended for More Than Expected Value Calculations.
P Harker,L Vargas (1987). The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process.
H Fazlollahtabar,I Mahdavi (2009). User/tutor optimal learning path in e-learning using comprehensive neuro-fuzzy approach.
L Leung,D Cao (2001). on the efficacy of modeling multiattribute decision problems using AHP and Sinarchy.
C Hwang,K Yoon (1981). Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications.
H Mianabadi,A Afshar (2008). Multi attribute Decision Making to rank urban water supply Scheme.
G Limon,Y Martinez (2006). Multi0criteria modeling of irrigation water Marked at basin level : aspsnish Case Study.
F Lootsma (1993). Scale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMART.
I Millet,T Saaty (2000). On the relativity of relative measures -accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP.
P Dey,E Ramcharan (2000). Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados.
Reay-Chen Wang,Tien-Fu Liang (2004). Application of fuzzy multi-objective linear programming to aggregate production planning.
R Ramanathan (2006). Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process.
T Saaty (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process, Planning, Priority, Resource Allocation.
Thomas Saaty (1986). Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
T Saaty (1987). Decision making, new information, ranking and structure.
T Saaty (1994). Highlights and critical points in the theory and applicationof the Analytic Hierarchy Process.
Thomas Saaty (1987). RANK GENERATION, PRESERVATION, AND REVERSAL IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY DECISION PROCESS.
Thomas Saaty,Masahiro Takizawa (1986). Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks.
T Saaty,L Vargas (1984). The legitimacy of rank reversal.
T Saaty,L Vargas,R Wendell (1983). Assessing attribute weights by ratios.
Thomas Saaty,Luis Vargas (1993). Experiments on rank preservation and reversal in relative measurement.
Bertram Schoner,William Wedley (1989). Ambiguous Criteria Weights in AHP: Consequences and Solutions*.
B Schoner,W Wedley,E Choo (1992). A rejoinder to Forman on AHP, with emphasis on the requirements of composite ratio scales.
B Schoner,W Wedley,E Choo (1993). A unified approach to AHP with linking pins.
Bertram Schoner,Eng Choo,William Wedley (1997). A Comment on ‘Rank Disagreement: A Comparison of Multi-Criteria Methodologies’.
T Stewart (1992). A critical survey on the status of multiple criteria decision making theory and practice.
E Triantaphyllou (2001). Two new cases of rank reversal s when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHP.
M Troutt (1988). Rank reversal and the dependence of priorities on the underlying MAV function.
L Vargas (1994). Reply to Schenkerman's avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision support models.
H Mianabadi,A Afshar (2007). Fuzzy group Decision Making and its Application in water Resource Planning and Management.
S Mousavi,M; F; Chitsazan,Y Mirzaei,M; B ; Shaan,H Mohammadi (2010). EVALUATION OF GROUND WATER POTENTIAL OF NALLATANGAAL ODAI USING REMOTE SENSING AND GIS TECHNIQUES.
S Watson,A Freeling (1982). Assessing attribute weights.
S Watson,A Freeling (1983). Assesing Attribute Weights.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Alireza Arab Ameri. 2014. \u201cApplication of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for Prioritize of Concrete Pavement\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary GJHSS-H Volume 13 (GJHSS Volume 13 Issue H3).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJHSS Volume 13 Issue H3

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

CRCP JPCP JRCP pavement: AHP PCP prioritize

Submission ReceivedDecember 8, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 2, 2013
Published January 15, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 30, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 82

Country: Iran

Subject: Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary

Authors: S.A Nourozi, A.R Shariati. (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 168

Total Views (Real + Logic): 5011

Total Downloads (simulated): 2455

Publish Date: 2014 01, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 51 views
Month 2: 29 views
Month 3: 25 views
Month 4: 57 views
Month 5: 41 views
Month 6: 45 views
Month 7: 22 views
Month 8: 33 views
Month 9: 40 views
Month 10: 59 views
Month 11: 31 views
Month 12: 21 views
Month 13: 43 views
Month 14: 45 views
Month 15: 25 views
Month 16: 19 views
Month 17: 39 views
Month 18: 42 views
Month 19: 39 views
Month 20: 37 views
Month 21: 30 views
Month 22: 42 views
Month 23: 19 views
Month 24: 16 views
Month 25: 31 views
Month 26: 40 views
Month 27: 47 views
Month 28: 17 views
Month 29: 34 views
Month 30: 16 views
Month 31: 42 views
Month 32: 19 views
Month 33: 27 views
Month 34: 23 views
Month 35: 12 views
Month 36: 26 views
Month 37: 20 views
Month 38: 19 views
Month 39: 15 views
Month 40: 36 views
Month 41: 22 views
Month 42: 22 views
Month 43: 42 views
Month 44: 24 views
Month 45: 31 views
Month 46: 21 views
Month 47: 36 views
Month 48: 28 views
Month 49: 20 views
Month 50: 28 views
Month 51: 24 views
Month 52: 48 views
Month 53: 38 views
Month 54: 40 views
Month 55: 35 views
Month 56: 43 views
Month 57: 45 views
Month 58: 42 views
Month 59: 47 views
Month 60: 18 views
Month 61: 22 views
Month 62: 20 views
Month 63: 29 views
Month 64: 50 views
Month 65: 30 views
Month 66: 29 views
Month 67: 41 views
Month 68: 48 views
Month 69: 36 views
Month 70: 43 views
Month 71: 37 views
Month 72: 30 views
Month 73: 24 views
Month 74: 33 views
Month 75: 29 views
Month 76: 37 views
Month 77: 45 views
Month 78: 46 views
Month 79: 20 views
Month 80: 23 views
Month 81: 42 views
Month 82: 48 views
Month 83: 38 views
Month 84: 26 views
Month 85: 29 views
Month 86: 29 views
Month 87: 40 views
Month 88: 40 views
Month 89: 28 views
Month 90: 25 views
Month 91: 29 views
Month 92: 33 views
Month 93: 41 views
Month 94: 35 views
Month 95: 18 views
Month 96: 40 views
Month 97: 38 views
Month 98: 32 views
Month 99: 42 views
Month 100: 21 views
Month 101: 34 views
Month 102: 23 views
Month 103: 38 views
Month 104: 41 views
Month 105: 33 views
Month 106: 38 views
Month 107: 13 views
Month 108: 33 views
Month 109: 39 views
Month 110: 27 views
Month 111: 29 views
Month 112: 36 views
Month 113: 41 views
Month 114: 40 views
Month 115: 35 views
Month 116: 16 views
Month 117: 33 views
Month 118: 33 views
Month 119: 36 views
Month 120: 37 views
Month 121: 20 views
Month 122: 31 views
Month 123: 26 views
Month 124: 45 views
Month 125: 38 views
Month 126: 22 views
Month 127: 41 views
Month 128: 18 views
Month 129: 30 views
Month 130: 21 views
Month 131: 48 views
Month 132: 46 views
Month 133: 44 views
Month 134: 26 views
Month 135: 14 views
Month 136: 21 views
Month 137: 42 views
Month 138: 34 views
Month 139: 37 views
Month 140: 27 views
Month 141: 38 views
Month 142: 47 views
Month 143: 32 views
Month 144: 32 views
Month 145: 52 views
Month 146: 30 views
Month 147: 55 views
Month 148: 55 views

Total Views: 5011

Total Downloads: 2455

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]