Assessing Weight of the Coupling between Objects towards defect forecasting in Object Oriented Programming

Assessing Weight of the Coupling between Objects towards defect forecasting in Object Oriented Programming

SAIDULU A

Contact

Assessing Weight of the Coupling between Objects towards defect forecasting in Object Oriented Programming

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

CSTSDE35IDN

Assessing Weight of the Coupling between Objects towards defect forecasting in Object Oriented Programming Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

References

22 Cites in Article

Reference Format

J Kleinberg (1999). Authoritative Sources in a Hyperlinked Environment.
J Bansiya,C Davis (2002). A hierarchical model for object-oriented design quality assessment.
L Briand,J Wüst,J Daly,V Porter (2000). Exploring the relationship between design measures and software quality in object-oriented systems.
L Briand,J Wust,H Lounis (1999). Using coupling measurement for impact analysis in object-oriented systems.
D Poshyvanyk,A Marcus,R Ferenc,T Gyimóthy (2009). Using Information Retrieval based Coupling Measures for Impact Analysis.
F Wilkie,B Kitchenham (2000). Coupling measures and change ripples in C++ application software.
D Lawrie,H Feild,D Binkley (2006). Leveraged Quality Assessment Using Information Retrieval Techniques.
K El-Emam,K Melo (1999). The Prediction of Faulty Classes Using Object-Oriented Design Metrics.
T Gyimothy,R Ferenc,I Siket (2005). Empirical validation of object-oriented metrics on open source software for fault prediction.
T.-S Quah,M Thwin Application of neural networks for software quality prediction using OO metrics.
G Antoniol,R Fiutem,L Cristoforetti (1998). Using metrics to identify design patterns in object-oriented software.
E Arisholm,L Briand,A Foyen (2004). Dynamic coupling measurement for object-oriented software.
V Basili,L Briand,W Melo (1996). A Validation of OO Design Metrics as Quality Indicators.
L Briand,W Melo,J Wust (2002). Assessing the applicability of fault-proneness models across object-oriented software projects.
Hector Olague,Letha Etzkorn,Sampson Gholston,Stephen Quattlebaum (2007). Empirical Validation of Three Software Metrics Suites to Predict Fault-Proneness of Object-Oriented Classes Developed Using Highly Iterative or Agile Software Development Processes.
R Subramanyam,M Krishnan (2003). Empirical analysis of CK metrics for object-oriented design complexity: implications for software defects.
R Shyam,Chris Chidamber,Kemerer (1993). A Metrics suite for Object Oriented design.
Lionel Briand,John Daly,Jürgen Wüst (1996). A Unified Framework for Cohesion Measurement in Object-Oriented Systems.
Lionel Victor Basili,Walcelio Briand,Melo (1996). A Validation of Object-Oriented Design Metrics as Quality Indicators.
Roger Whitney (1997). Advanced OO. Docs 6 & 8, Metrics.
A Houari,Robert Sahraoui,Thierry God In,Miceli Can Metrics Help Bridging the Gap Between the Improvement of OO Design Quality and Its Automation.
K Aggarwal,Yogesh Singh,Arvinder Kaur,Ruchika Malhotra (2007). Investigating effect of Design Metrics on Fault Proneness in Object-Oriented Systems..

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

SAIDULU A. 2014. \u201cAssessing Weight of the Coupling between Objects towards defect forecasting in Object Oriented Programming\u201d. Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering GJCST-C Volume 14 (GJCST Volume 14 Issue C8): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJCST Volume 14 Issue C8
Pg. 35- 39

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/gjcst

Print ISSN 0975-4350

e-ISSN 0975-4172

Keywords

Cohesion coupling between objects defect forecasting design metrics software engineering

Submission ReceivedDecember 6, 2013
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2014
Published January 15, 2014

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 27, 2014

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 101

Country: India

Subject: Global Journal of Computer Science and Technology - C: Software & Data Engineering

Authors: SAIDULU A (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 263

Total Views (Real + Logic): 8608

Total Downloads (simulated): 2327

Publish Date: 2014 11, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 40 views
Month 2: 32 views
Month 3: 43 views
Month 4: 32 views
Month 5: 51 views
Month 6: 43 views
Month 7: 15 views
Month 8: 46 views
Month 9: 27 views
Month 10: 53 views
Month 11: 58 views
Month 12: 18 views
Month 13: 21 views
Month 14: 32 views
Month 15: 45 views
Month 16: 28 views
Month 17: 25 views
Month 18: 21 views
Month 19: 24 views
Month 20: 22 views
Month 21: 44 views
Month 22: 36 views
Month 23: 32 views
Month 24: 37 views
Month 25: 30 views
Month 26: 31 views
Month 27: 24 views
Month 28: 29 views
Month 29: 25 views
Month 30: 32 views
Month 31: 21 views
Month 32: 33 views
Month 33: 48 views
Month 34: 42 views
Month 35: 40 views
Month 36: 18 views
Month 37: 42 views
Month 38: 43 views
Month 39: 28 views
Month 40: 29 views
Month 41: 30 views
Month 42: 31 views
Month 43: 31 views
Month 44: 30 views
Month 45: 33 views
Month 46: 38 views
Month 47: 25 views
Month 48: 33 views
Month 49: 34 views
Month 50: 35 views
Month 51: 23 views
Month 52: 40 views
Month 53: 36 views
Month 54: 20 views
Month 55: 18 views
Month 56: 27 views
Month 57: 31 views
Month 58: 30 views
Month 59: 31 views
Month 60: 40 views
Month 61: 23 views
Month 62: 20 views
Month 63: 37 views
Month 64: 22 views
Month 65: 34 views
Month 66: 21 views
Month 67: 17 views
Month 68: 26 views
Month 69: 28 views
Month 70: 19 views
Month 71: 19 views
Month 72: 39 views
Month 73: 26 views
Month 74: 35 views
Month 75: 36 views
Month 76: 23 views
Month 77: 21 views
Month 78: 16 views
Month 79: 28 views
Month 80: 38 views
Month 81: 42 views
Month 82: 36 views
Month 83: 20 views
Month 84: 46 views
Month 85: 35 views
Month 86: 25 views
Month 87: 26 views
Month 88: 27 views
Month 89: 30 views
Month 90: 24 views
Month 91: 16 views
Month 92: 41 views
Month 93: 29 views
Month 94: 23 views
Month 95: 29 views
Month 96: 16 views
Month 97: 28 views
Month 98: 21 views
Month 99: 18 views
Month 100: 34 views
Month 101: 36 views
Month 102: 34 views
Month 103: 34 views
Month 104: 36 views
Month 105: 26 views
Month 106: 38 views
Month 107: 32 views
Month 108: 49 views
Month 109: 18 views
Month 110: 24 views
Month 111: 16 views
Month 112: 40 views
Month 113: 43 views
Month 114: 23 views
Month 115: 22 views
Month 116: 35 views
Month 117: 25 views
Month 118: 37 views
Month 119: 19 views
Month 120: 40 views
Month 121: 22 views
Month 122: 24 views
Month 123: 29 views
Month 124: 27 views
Month 125: 20 views
Month 126: 22 views
Month 127: 31 views
Month 128: 31 views
Month 129: 26 views
Month 130: 31 views
Month 131: 46 views
Month 132: 31 views
Month 133: 31 views
Month 134: 26 views
Month 135: 41 views
Month 136: 58 views
Month 137: 33 views
Month 138: 42 views

Total Views: 8608

Total Downloads: 2327

2026 Trends

Published Article

Abstract not found

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]