Assessment of Groundwater Pollution using Geophysical Norms and GIS as a Tool, a Case Study of Part of Ikeja, Lagos State, West Africa, Nigeria

Omogunloye Gabriel; Jimoh Atanda

Assessment of Groundwater Pollution using Geophysical Norms and GIS as a Tool, a Case Study of Part of Ikeja, Lagos State, West Africa, Nigeria

Omogunloye Olusola Gabriel * §

Contact

Jimoh Rafiu Atanda ‡

Contact

§ Department of Surveying and Geoinformatics, Universi...

‡ Department of Water science and Engineering, UNESCO-...

Assessment of Groundwater Pollution using Geophysical Norms and GIS as a Tool, a Case Study of Part of Ikeja, Lagos State, West Africa, Nigeria

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

K64HT

Assessment of Groundwater Pollution using Geophysical Norms and GIS as a Tool, a Case Study of Part of Ikeja, Lagos State, West Africa, Nigeria Banner

Key Research Insights

Synthesized scholarly intelligence & interactive research assistant

This converted HTML version may contain rendering inconsistencies. Please refer to the PDF for the authoritative version, or click here to provide feedback.

Abstract

GIS and Electrical resistivity method of geophysical methods has been combined for the assessment of groundwater potential in Ikeja Local Government of Lagos State, Nigeria. Ten (10) vertical electrical sounding was carried out using the High resolution Abem Terrameter Sas 4000 Earth resistivity Meter.Curve matching techniques and Win Resist software were used to process and iterate VES data; Auto CAD 2012 version was used to draw the geoelectric section using the depth of each lithology and was then imported into the Arc GIS to perform several queries. The study area is situated in Ikeja, Lagos state and falls within the south-western Nigeria. The groundwater regime of the selected location has been delineated into Good quality fresh water, Good quality water, Intermediate quality fresh water, and Poor quality fresh water. The resistivity of the vertical electrical sounding carried out in the study area varies from 15.6Ωm to 1440Ωm. Fourteen(14) Geoelectric layers were delineated from the study area includes the Topsoil, Sand, Clayey sand, Coarse sand, Sandy clay, Clay, Clay/sand intercalation, gravelly sand, sand stone, silty clay, fine sand, clay with intercalations of thin sand layer, and coarse sand/sandstone. The pollution plume was noticed in VES 1, 4, 5 and 9 and the effect was more pronounced in VES 9 because of the leachate effect from Olushosun Landfill characterized with sand having resistivity range from 27Ωm to 30Ωm.This signify that the groundwater has been polluted at the surface.

References

8 Cites in Article

Reference Format

1. Keros Cartwright,Murray McComas (1968). Geophysical Surveys in the Vicinity of Sanitary Landfills in Northeastern Illinois a. Groundwater, 6(5), 23-30.
CrossRef DOI
2. K. Cartwright,F. Sherman,Jr (1972). Electrical earth resistivity surveying in Landfill investigations. Reprinted from proceedings of the 10th annual engineering and soils engineering symposium, 77-92.
3. Anthony Elueze,Matthew Nton (2004). Elueze, A.A. and Nton, M.E., 2004. Organic geochemical appraisal of limestones and shales in part of eastern Dahomey basin, south-western Nigeria. Journal of Mining and Geology, 40(1), 29-40.
CrossRef DOI
4. W. Fink,D.B.Aulenbach (1974). Protracted recharge of treated sewage into sand,part 11,tracing the flow of contaminated groundwater with a resistivity survey. Groundwater, 12(4), 219-223.
5. J. Fried,P. Ungemach (1971). Note: a dispersion model for a quantitative study of the groundwater pollution by salt-water. Water Research, 5(7), 491-495.
CrossRef DOI
6. H. Jones,R. Hockey (1964). The geology of part of south western Nigeria. Geol. Survey. Nigeria. Geol. Survey. Nigeria, Bull, 31, 1-101.
7. Nuhu Obaje (2009). Geology and Mineral Resources of Nigeria.
8. F. Ogbe (1992). Stratigraphy of strata exposed in the Ewekoro quarry.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Omogunloye Olusola Gabriel, Jimoh Rafiu Atanda. 2014. "Assessment of Groundwater Pollution using Geophysical Norms and GIS as a Tool, a Case Study of Part of Ikeja, Lagos State, West Africa, Nigeria". Global Journal of Human-Social Science - B: Geography, Environmental Science & Disaster Management GJHSS-B Volume 13 (GJHSS Volume 13 Issue 48 (B8)).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJHSS Volume 13 Issue 48 (B8)

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords

electrical resistivity method geophysical norms GIS groundwater pollution vertical electrical sounding

Classification

GJHSS-B Classification FOR Code: 040499

Submission ReceivedDecember 14, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 4, 2013
Published November 1, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

November 1, 2013

Language

English

Order Article Reprint

Experience in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 103

Country: Nigeria

Subject: Global Journal of Human-Social Science - B: Geography, Environmental Science & Disaster Management

Authors: Omogunloye Olusola, Gabriel, Jimoh Rafiu Atanda (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 509

Total Views (Real + Logic): 1547

Total Downloads (simulated): 92

Publish Date: 2013 10, Fri

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 36 views
Month 2: 53 views
Month 3: 37 views
Month 4: 41 views
Month 5: 16 views
Month 6: 28 views
Month 7: 38 views
Month 8: 57 views
Month 9: 41 views
Month 10: 36 views
Month 11: 37 views
Month 12: 28 views
Month 13: 14 views
Month 14: 16 views
Month 15: 30 views
Month 16: 19 views
Month 17: 30 views
Month 18: 24 views
Month 19: 30 views
Month 20: 20 views
Month 21: 18 views
Month 22: 36 views
Month 23: 35 views
Month 24: 37 views
Month 25: 43 views
Month 26: 24 views
Month 27: 24 views
Month 28: 22 views
Month 29: 42 views
Month 30: 22 views
Month 31: 36 views
Month 32: 36 views
Month 33: 27 views
Month 34: 35 views
Month 35: 40 views
Month 36: 24 views
Month 37: 12 views
Month 38: 34 views
Month 39: 29 views
Month 40: 32 views
Month 41: 37 views
Month 42: 38 views
Month 43: 45 views
Month 44: 15 views
Month 45: 18 views
Month 46: 29 views
Month 47: 35 views
Month 48: 33 views
Month 49: 19 views
Month 50: 22 views
Month 51: 32 views
Month 52: 30 views
Month 53: 29 views
Month 54: 16 views
Month 55: 46 views
Month 56: 44 views
Month 57: 24 views
Month 58: 29 views
Month 59: 30 views
Month 60: 40 views
Month 61: 41 views
Month 62: 35 views
Month 63: 35 views
Month 64: 40 views
Month 65: 29 views
Month 66: 15 views
Month 67: 15 views
Month 68: 25 views
Month 69: 22 views
Month 70: 34 views
Month 71: 43 views
Month 72: 26 views
Month 73: 44 views
Month 74: 27 views
Month 75: 34 views
Month 76: 40 views
Month 77: 37 views
Month 78: 14 views
Month 79: 33 views
Month 80: 15 views
Month 81: 19 views
Month 82: 26 views
Month 83: 14 views
Month 84: 38 views
Month 85: 43 views
Month 86: 32 views
Month 87: 12 views
Month 88: 12 views
Month 89: 24 views
Month 90: 30 views
Month 91: 45 views
Month 92: 29 views
Month 93: 34 views
Month 94: 32 views
Month 95: 29 views
Month 96: 27 views
Month 97: 32 views
Month 98: 48 views
Month 99: 26 views
Month 100: 16 views
Month 101: 42 views
Month 102: 32 views
Month 103: 47 views
Month 104: 23 views
Month 105: 18 views
Month 106: 30 views
Month 107: 42 views
Month 108: 33 views
Month 109: 16 views
Month 110: 27 views
Month 111: 34 views
Month 112: 42 views
Month 113: 27 views
Month 114: 22 views
Month 115: 18 views
Month 116: 36 views
Month 117: 23 views
Month 118: 25 views
Month 119: 26 views
Month 120: 31 views
Month 121: 36 views
Month 122: 34 views
Month 123: 30 views
Month 124: 21 views
Month 125: 33 views
Month 126: 20 views
Month 127: 20 views
Month 128: 25 views
Month 129: 14 views
Month 130: 25 views
Month 131: 28 views
Month 132: 32 views
Month 133: 42 views
Month 134: 42 views
Month 135: 21 views
Month 136: 28 views
Month 137: 23 views
Month 138: 42 views
Month 139: 29 views
Month 140: 14 views
Month 141: 46 views
Month 142: 26 views
Month 143: 39 views
Month 144: 30 views
Month 145: 28 views
Month 146: 36 views
Month 147: 70 views
Month 148: 61 views
Month 149: 54 views
Month 150: 43 views
Month 151: 38 views
Month 152: 49 views
Month 153: 24 views
Month 154: 42 views
Month 155: 20 views
Month 156: 24 views
Month 157: 58 views

Total Views: 1.5K

Total Downloads: 92

All Trends