Assessment of Village Chicken Production Systems In Kambata Tambaro and Wolaita Zones, SNNPR, Ethiopia

1
Aman Getiso
Aman Getiso
2
Fitsum Tessema
Fitsum Tessema
3
Mesfin Mekonnen
Mesfin Mekonnen
4
Addisu Jimma
Addisu Jimma
5
Bereket Zeleke
Bereket Zeleke
1 to 2 Southern Agricultural Research Institute

Send Message

To: Author

GJSFR Volume 15 Issue D9

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

17R6J

Assessment of Village Chicken Production Systems In Kambata Tambaro and Wolaita Zones, SNNPR, Ethiopia Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

The study was conducted in four woredas (Damot Gale,Of a, Angacha and Hadero Tunto) the first two of them found in Wolaita zone and two of them in Kambata Tambaro Zone of SNNPR, Ethiopia respectively. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the study areas to assess village chicken production systems, productive and reproductive performance of village chicken and identifying constraints to village chicken production. Stratified random sampling technique was used to select 240 farming households and administer a pre-tested and structured questionnaire. The results showed that the mean age of interviewed farmers was 37.8±9.3 years; average family size & chicken owned per household were 6.8±2.4 persons and 8.6±1.7 heads, respectively. There was no significant differences (p ≥0.05) found among the four woredas in all the above traits. The average number of clutch and eggs per hen per year of local chicken in the study areas were 4±0.87 and 12.9±3.47 respectively.

24 Cites in Articles

References

  1. M Aberra (2000). Comparative studies on performance and physiological responses of Ethiopian indigenous ('Angete-melata') chicken and their F1 crosses to long term heat stress.
  2. Aberra Melesse,Tegene Negesse (2011). Phenotypic and morphological characterization of indigenous chicken populations in southern region of Ethiopia.
  3. R Alders (2004). Unknown Title.
  4. J Bell,I Abodu (1995). DYNAMICS OF VILLAGE POULTRY PRODUCTION IN THE KEITA REGION OF NIGER.
  5. B Besbes (2009). Genotype evaluation and breeding of poultry for performance under suboptimal village conditions.
  6. C Conroy,N Sparks,D Chandrasekaran,A Sharma,D Shindey,L Singh,A Natarajan,K Anitha (2005). The significance of predation as a constraint in scavenging poultry systems: some findings from India.
  7. Deneke Negassa (2013). Production system and morphological characterization of indigenous chicken in tiyo, hetossa and dodota woredas of arsi zone, Oromia, Ethiopia.
  8. Fisseha Moges (2008). Studies on production and marketing systems of local chicken ecotypes in Burie district of North West Amhara.
  9. Fisseha Moges,Aberra Melesse,Tadelle Dessie (2010). Assessment of village chicken production system and evaluation of the productive and reproductive performance of local chicken ecotype in Bure district, North West Ethiopia.
  10. F Halima Hassen,E Neser,A Van Marle-Koster,Kock (2007). a. Village-based indigenous chicken production system in north-west Ethiopia.
  11. Cheru Sifir,Ewnet Alemayehu (2010). Consistency Of Condom Use and Associated Factors Among Adolescent in Yeka Sub-City, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2024.
  12. S Kondombo (2005). Improvement of village chicken production in a mixed (chicken-ram) farming system in Burkina Faso.
  13. Elias Gonta,Meseret Girma,Mengistu Urge (2007). Assessment of Smallholder Chicken Production Practices, Marketing and Constraints in Two Districts of South-Omo Zone, Ethiopia.
  14. Melese Nigatu,Melkamu Bezabih (2014). Assessment of Chicken Production under Farmers Management Condition in East Gojam Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia.
  15. Melese Nigatu,Melkamu Bezabih (2014). Assessment of Chicken Production under Farmers Management Condition in East Gojam Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia.
  16. F Moges,T Azage,Dessie (2010). Indigenous chicken production and marketing systems in Ethiopia: Characteristics and opportunities for market-oriented development.
  17. Mulugeta Ayalew,Tebkew Adane (2013). Evaluation of indigenous chicken productivity by using a questioner survey, in selected Chagni town, Awi -administrative zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia.
  18. D Nigussie,Y Alemu,D Tadelle,W Samuel (2003). Onstation and on-farm evaluation of the 'hay-Box chick brooder' using different insulation materials at Debre Zeit Agricultural Research Center and Denbi village, Adaa woreda.
  19. D Nigussie,L Van Der Waaij,Dessie Van Arendonk,Jam (2010). Production objectives and Trait preferences of village poultry producers of Ethiopia: implications for designing breeding schemes utilizing indigenous chicken genetic resources.
  20. C Pedersen (2002). Production of semi-scavenging chickens in Zimbabwe.
  21. D Solomon (2003). Growth performance and survival of local and White Leghorn chickens under scavenging and intensive systems of management in Ethiopia.
  22. Solomon Demeke (2008). CHARACTERIZATION OF POULTRY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS IN THE RURAL SECTOR OF FAYOUM.
  23. Gadisa Alemu,Negash Geleta,Alemu Dabi,Ruth Duga,Cherinet Kasahun,Abebe Delasa,Tamirat Negash,Tafesse Solomon,Habtemariam Zegaye,Abebe Getamesay,Dawit Asnake,Bayisa Asefa,Zerihun Tadesse,Berhanu Sime,Bekele Abeyo,Ayele Badebo,Endashaw Girma,Tilahun Bayisa (2013). The Agronomic and Quality Descriptions of Ethiopian Bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Variety “Boru”.
  24. Zemene Worku (2011). Assessment of Village Chicken Production System and the Performance of Local Chicken Populations in West Amhara Region of Ethiopia.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Aman Getiso. 2016. \u201cAssessment of Village Chicken Production Systems In Kambata Tambaro and Wolaita Zones, SNNPR, Ethiopia\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary GJSFR-D Volume 15 (GJSFR Volume 15 Issue D9): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 15 Issue D9
Pg. 21- 29
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Keywords
Classification
GJSFR-D Classification: FOR Code: 079999
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 9, 2016

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 3853
Total Downloads: 1970
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

The study was conducted in four woredas (Damot Gale,Of a, Angacha and Hadero Tunto) the first two of them found in Wolaita zone and two of them in Kambata Tambaro Zone of SNNPR, Ethiopia respectively. A cross-sectional survey was conducted in the study areas to assess village chicken production systems, productive and reproductive performance of village chicken and identifying constraints to village chicken production. Stratified random sampling technique was used to select 240 farming households and administer a pre-tested and structured questionnaire. The results showed that the mean age of interviewed farmers was 37.8±9.3 years; average family size & chicken owned per household were 6.8±2.4 persons and 8.6±1.7 heads, respectively. There was no significant differences (p ≥0.05) found among the four woredas in all the above traits. The average number of clutch and eggs per hen per year of local chicken in the study areas were 4±0.87 and 12.9±3.47 respectively.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Assessment of Village Chicken Production Systems In Kambata Tambaro and Wolaita Zones, SNNPR, Ethiopia

Aman Getiso
Aman Getiso Southern Agricultural Research Institute
Fitsum Tessema
Fitsum Tessema Southern Agricultural Research Institute
Mesfin Mekonnen
Mesfin Mekonnen
Addisu Jimma
Addisu Jimma
Bereket Zeleke
Bereket Zeleke

Research Journals