Balanced Scorecard Perspectives and Institutional Performance of Private Tertiary Institutions

Francis Osei-Kuffour
Francis Osei-Kuffour
Valley View University

Send Message

To: Author

Balanced Scorecard Perspectives and Institutional Performance of Private Tertiary Institutions

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

07R8C

Balanced Scorecard Perspectives and Institutional Performance of Private Tertiary Institutions Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu
Font Type
Font Size
Font Size
Bedground

Abstract

Business managers around the globe have tested the effectiveness of the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) model since its inception in the early 90s in their bid to enhance business performance to achieve financial sustainability and transform developments in their economies. Other sectors of world economies have tried to emulate the BSC concept to achieve institutional goals for financial freedom. Research on the investigation of the replicability of the BSC model and its effectiveness in addressing the continued financial sustainability challenges of educational institutions, especially the private ones, is scarce. This study aimed to increase awareness of the influence of BSC application in addressing financial performance challenges besetting the private educational sector.

References

45 Cites in Article
  1. S Aboajela,S Amar (2017). The balanced scorecards acceptance, importance and use in Libyan higher education.
  2. C Addo (2018). Central running on life support-Registrar.
  3. B Afful (2019). Private tertiary education near collapse-NAB report confirms.
  4. Rhys Andrews,Malcolm Beynon,Aoife Mcdermott (2015). Organizational Capability in the Public Sector: A Configurational Approach.
  5. Batchimeg Bayaraa (2017). Financial Performance Determinants of Organizations: The Case of Mongolian Companies.
  6. K Beg (2016). Determinants of financial selfsufficiency of Andhra Pradesh microfinance institutions.
  7. Josep Bisbe,Joan Barrubés (2016). The Balanced Scorecard as a Management Tool for Assessing and Monitoring Strategy Implementation in Health Care Organizations.
  8. C Bissessar (2017). Proposal for the Implementation of the balanced scorecard in managing higher education institutions.
  9. M Camilleri (2021). Using the balanced scorecard as a performance management tool in higher education.
  10. Zanna Cernostana (2017). Measuring financial sustainability of private higher education institutions.
  11. J Cohen (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences.
  12. C Dragusin,L Pascual,M Mihai,Z Dudic,M Gregus (2016). Indicators of the economic and financial performance for the public universities in Romania 16.
  13. C Esampally,M Joshi (2016). Operational self-sufficiency of select NBFC-MFIS of Andhra Pradesh.
  14. Sorour Farokhi,Emad Roghanian,Yaser Samimi (2018). Quantitative target setting in balanced scorecard method using simultaneous equations system and goal programming.
  15. E Ferdinand (2020). Lack of funds forces 21 schools out of 2020.
  16. S Gündüzalp,I Arabacı (2017). Applicability of balanced scorecard system in primary schools according to opinions of education inspectors, managers and teachers. 21.
  17. A Gupta,S Sharma (2017). Balanced Scorecard: A Conceptual Framework.
  18. Otuo Agyemang,Monia Castellini (2015). Corporate governance in an emergent economy: a case of Ghana.
  19. R Kaplan,P S & Norton (2010). Conceptual foundations of the balanced scorecard.
  20. Sami Al Kharusi,Sree Rama Murthy Y. (2018). Financial sustainability of private higher education institutions: the case of publicly traded educational institutions.
  21. D Lattz (2017). Understanding coverage ratio, a measure of the ability to repay loans.
  22. P León (2001). Four pillars of financial sustainability.
  23. B Mair (2016). Success Factor Four: Treat Balanced Scorecard as a Project.
  24. Dr Malgwi,H Dahiru (2014). Balanced Scorecard financial measurement of organizational performance: A review.
  25. Natalia Manea,Mihaela Purcaru (2017). THE EVOLUTION OF EDUCATIONAL MARKETING.
  26. Ali Matar,Bilal Eneizan (2018). Determinants of Financial Performance in the Industrial Firms: Evidence from Jordan.
  27. C Molele,N Tefu (2020). 60% of private schools risk closing down due to financial challenges, non-payment of school fees by parents.
  28. Bhagyshree Bhoir,Dr. Suri (2017). Impact of Emotional Intelligence on Performance of Employees at Manufacturing Organizations.
  29. M Mugambi (2016). Risk Management Planning and The Sustainability of Donor-Funded Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Projects in Nairobi City County, Kenya.
  30. A Mugo,S Ngahu (2015). Assessment of financial challenges affecting operations of private tertiary colleges in Nakuru town, Kenya.
  31. Bedman Narteh (2018). Brand equity and financial performance.
  32. F Naz,F Ijaz,F Naqvi (2016). Financial performance of firms: Evidence from Pakistan Cement Industries.
  33. Moses Oketch,Maurice Mutisya,Moses Ngware,Alex Ezeh,Charles Epari (2010). Free primary education policy and pupil school mobility in urban Kenya.
  34. M Olasunkanmi,T Asaolu (2019). Balanced Scorecard and Private Universities’ Performance in South-Western, Nigeria.
  35. Rizky Febryawan,Indrawan,Muksin Nurohman3 (2013). The Effect of Implementing Oracle Enterprise Resource Planning on Increasing Inventory Accuracy at PT EPM.
  36. V Patidar (2013). Balanced Scorecard -A Conceptual Framework.
  37. Oleg Pavlov,Evangelos Katsamakas (2019). Financial Sustainability of Colleges as Complex Service Systems.
  38. A Sarkin (2016). Learning and Growth Perspective of the Balanced Scorecard.
  39. Haliah Haliah,Amalia Febriani,Andi Kusumawati (2012). The Influence of Implementing Accountability on the Management of Village Fund Allocation.
  40. W Vagias (2006). Ph.D. Approved at Clemson (U.S.A.).
  41. H Vazifehdoost,A Negahdari (2018). Relationships of brand awareness, brand association and perceived quality with brand loyalty and repurchase intention.
  42. C Vu (2018). Balanced scorecard application in universities and higher educational institutions: Implementation guide in an Iranian Context.
  43. Capt. Asuzah,Prof. Diang’a,Dr. Mugwima (2018). The Impact of Maintenance Factors on Sustainability of Green Buildings in Nairobi County, Kenya.
  44. W Wijewaradana,P Munasinghe (2015). Cash Flows and Firm Performance: Some Evidence from the Sri Lankan Firms Cash Flow.
  45. K Yanka (2017). Leadership for a changing publicprivate higher education landscape.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Francis Osei-Kuffour. 2021. \u201cBalanced Scorecard Perspectives and Institutional Performance of Private Tertiary Institutions\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 21 (GJMBR Volume 21 Issue A9).

Download Citation

High-quality ALT: Balanced scorecard research on private tertiary institutions' performance and management.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords
Classification
GJMBR-A Classification JEL Code: J62
M00
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date
August 24, 2021

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 1979
Total Downloads: 907
2026 Trends
Related Research
Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Balanced Scorecard Perspectives and Institutional Performance of Private Tertiary Institutions

Francis Osei-Kuffour
Francis Osei-Kuffour <p>Valley View University</p>

Research Journals