Benefits of Persistence in Aspects of Patenting Strategy

Benefits of Persistence in Aspects of Patenting Strategy

Kathryn Rudie Harrigan

Contact

Yunzhe Fang

Contact

Benefits of Persistence in Aspects of Patenting Strategy

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

67DW1

Benefits of Persistence in Aspects of Patenting Strategy Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

Although some firms followed persistent patterns of patenting activity over time, results from the technology-intensive electronics industry indicated that patenting may have only a fungible competitive effect, i.e., frequent patenting has become an activity that raises the ticket of admission to compete therein without necessarily improving firms’ relative financial returns. Results also suggested that persistence in filing many patents was helpful to improving performance within electronics, as was having radical patent antecedents. Having aboveaverage numbers of uncited patents was associated with an external indicator of firms’ efforts to amass patent thickets and associated with increasing firm profitability. Resource recommendations from results are mixed since patenting persistence has an effect on performance, but some types of patenting activity appear to have diminishing returns.

References

45 Cites in Article

Reference Format

Ashish Arora,Sharon Belenzon,Andrea Patacconi (2018). The decline of science in corporate R&D.
Gautam Ahuja,Riitta Katila (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: a longitudinal study.
N Brinn,J Fleming,F Hannaka,C Thomas,P Beling (2003). Investigation of forward citation count as a patent analysis method.
Matthieu Eecke,Daan Coppens,Christoph Kenis,Pascale Paepe,Tom Vauterin,Frederick Dochy (2016). Excision of a PIK3CA Mutated Laryngeal Venous Malformation by TransOral Robotic Surgery (TORS).
Michael Cooper,Anne Knott,Wenhao Yang (2019). Measuring Innovation.
K Dahlin,D Behrens (2005). When is an invention really radical? Defining and measuring technological radicalness.
G De Rassenfosse,A Jaffe (2018). Are patent fees effective at weeding out low-quality patents.
M Entezarkheir (2017). Patent thickets, defensive patenting, and induced R&D: an empirical analysis of the costs and potential benefits of fragmentation in patent ownership.
Alfonso Gambardella,Dietmar Harhoff,Bart Verspagen (2017). The economic value of patent portfolios.
Martin Ganco,Rosemarie Ziedonis,Rajshree Agarwal (2015). More stars stay, but the brightest ones still leave: Job hopping in the shadow of patent enforcement.
P Ghemawat (1986). Sustainable advantage.
B Hall,A Jaffe,M Trajtenberg (2001). The NBER patent citations data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools.
Kathryn Harrigan,Maria Diguardo (2017). Sustainability of patent-based competitive advantage in the U.S. communications services industry.
Kathryn Harrigan,Maria Di Guardo,Bo Cowgill (2017). Multiplicative-innovation synergies: tests in technological acquisitions.
Kathryn Harrigan,Maria Di Guardo,Elona Marku,Brian Velez (2016). Using a distance measure to operationalise patent originality.
K Harrigan,Y Fang (2019). The financial benefits of persistently high forward citations.
Deepak Hegde,David Mowery,Stuart Graham (2009). Pioneering Inventors or Thicket Builders: Which U.S. Firms Use Continuations in Patenting?.
U Kaiser,H Kongsted,K Laursen,A Ejsing (2018). Experience matters: The role of academic scientist mobility for industrial innovation.
Michael Cooper,Anne Knott,Wenhao Yang (2019). RQ Innovative Efficiency and Firm Value.
Ziqiu Zang,Chiara Di Guardo,Elona Marku,Jesse Kaplan,S,K Vekili (2015). The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation.
Ji Kim,H Steensma (2017). Employee mobility, spin‐outs, and knowledge spill‐in: How incumbent firms can learn from new ventures.
T Madsen,M Leiblein (2015). What factors affect the persistence of an innovation advantage.
Anita Mcgahan,Michael Porter (1997). HOW MUCH DOES INDUSTRY MATTER, REALLY?.
A Mcgahan,M Porter (1999). The persistence of shocks to profitability.
Michael Noel,Mark Schankerman (2013). Strategic Patenting and Software Innovation.
Margaret Peteraf (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view.
M Porter (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors.
Phanish Puranam,Kannan Srikanth (2007). What they know vs. what they do: how acquirers leverage technology acquisitions.
Peter Roberts (1999). Product innovation, product-market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry.
P Roberts,G Dowling (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance.
Timothy Ruefli,Robert Wiggins (2003). Industry, corporate, and segment effects and business performance: a non‐parametric approach.
Timothy Ruefli,Robert Wiggins (2005). Response to McGahan and Porter's commentary on ‘Industry, corporate and business‐segment effects and business performance: a non‐parametric approach’.
Rachelle Sampson (2005). Experience effects and collaborative returns in R&D alliances.
Susan Sanderson,Kenneth Simons (2014). Light emitting diodes and the lighting revolution: The emergence of a solid-state lighting industry.
Wilfred Schoenmakers,Geert Duysters (2010). The technological origins of radical inventions.
Joshua Sears,Glenn Hoetker (2014). Technological overlap, technological capabilities, and resource recombination in technological acquisitions.
Carl Shapiro (2001). Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard-Setting.
(2006). Innovation Policy and the Economy.
Christian Sternitzke (2013). An exploratory analysis of patent fencing in pharmaceuticals: The case of PDE5 inhibitors.
Toby Stuart (2000). Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: a study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry.
David Teece,Gary Pisano,Amy Shuen (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management.
Aleksey Mihaylov (2017). Portfolio management at Thomson Reuters.
S Torrisi,A Gambardella,P Giuri,D Harhoff,K Hoisl,M Mariani (2016). Used, blocking and sleeping patents: Empirical evidence from a largescale inventor survey.
D Verhoeven,J Bakker,R Veugelers (2016). Measuring technological novelty with patent-based indicators.
Birger Wernerfelt (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Kathryn Rudie Harrigan. 2020. \u201cBenefits of Persistence in Aspects of Patenting Strategy\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - A: Administration & Management GJMBR-A Volume 20 (GJMBR Volume 20 Issue A15).

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

GJMBR Volume 20 Issue A15

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

Not Found

Classification

GJMBR-A Classification JEL Code: M12

Submission ReceivedDecember 13, 2019
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted January 1, 2020
Published January 15, 2020

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

October 9, 2020

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Views: 2375

Total Downloads: 1136

2026 Trends

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]