Bioethical Quandaries during the Period of a Pandemic

α
Fereniki Panagopoulou-Koutnatzi
Fereniki Panagopoulou-Koutnatzi
α Panteion University Panteion University

Send Message

To: Author

Bioethical Quandaries during the Period of a Pandemic

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

SKB7T

Bioethical Quandaries during the Period of a Pandemic Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

Abstract

The period of the pandemic gave rise to multiple and intractable bioethical quandaries arising. In the context of the present study, we will limit ourselves to the examination of the critical issues of mandatory vaccination to manage the pandemic; compulsory medical testing, including temperature screening of the population; the use of experimental drugs; making the wearing of face masks mandatory; and the individual responsibility of each of us for the prevention of the pandemic. Participation stresses the importance of education in bioethics. Accordingly, it supports the notion that, once we win the fight for life and health, constitutional lawyers ought to take the reins and determine that the character of restrictive measures and healthcare policies adopted in periods of crisis, when a prime opportunity for their formulation presented itself because of the pandemic, is one of extraordinariness.

References

20 Cites in Article
  1. James Marsh (2013). The Canadian Encyclopedia, The 1885 Montreal Smallpox Epidemic.
  2. Stewart Lyman (2019). Anti-vaccine Activism in 2018 and 2019.
  3. Douglas Diekema (2015). Responding to Parental Refusals of Immunization of Children.
  4. Vassiliki Mollaki (2018). Child vaccination: Selfdetermination or protection of public health? Bioethical issues and proposals of the Hellenic Bioethics Committee.
  5. (null). Health Care Ethics Committee Determinations.
  6. Haralabos Anthopoulos (2020). Vaccine: The Limits of Non-Compulsory.
  7. (1999). Guidelines for the processing of personal data in the context of COVID-19 management, 18.03.
  8. Fereniki Panagopoulou-Koutnatzi (2021). Bioethical Quandaries during the Period of a Pandemic.
  9. Fereniki Panagopoulou-Koutnatzi (2020). The protection of personal data in the coronavirus era.
  10. Athanassios Raikos (2011). Constitutional Law, Fundamental Rights.
  11. Immanuel Kant (1970). The Metaphysics of Morals.
  12. Stavros Tsakyrakis (2012). Civil Disobedience.
  13. Fereniki Panagopoulou-Koutnatzi (2021). On the deniers of the face mask.
  14. Evandro Agazzi (2017). The individual and collective dimension in bioethics.
  15. Dimitra Papadopoulou-Klamari (2014). Clinical testing.
  16. Nikos Alivizatos (2020). Revision of the Code of Good Practice on Referendums.
  17. Haralabos Anthopoulos (2017). Interpretation of Article 25 of the Constitution.
  18. Haralabos Anthopoulos (2005). State of prevention and right to security.
  19. Haralabos Anthopoulos (2020). Covid-19 and the era of rights.
  20. Spyros Vlachopoulos (2020). No" to constitutional mithridatism.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Fereniki Panagopoulou-Koutnatzi. 2021. \u201cBioethical Quandaries during the Period of a Pandemic\u201d. Global Journal of Human-Social Science - H: Interdisciplinary GJHSS-H Volume 21 (GJHSS Volume 21 Issue H6): .

Download Citation

Bioquaternions during pandemic times.
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJHSS

Print ISSN 0975-587X

e-ISSN 2249-460X

Keywords
Classification
GJHSS-H Classification: FOR Code: 180199p
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

August 25, 2021

Language
en
Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 2013
Total Downloads: 939
2026 Trends
Related Research

Published Article

The period of the pandemic gave rise to multiple and intractable bioethical quandaries arising. In the context of the present study, we will limit ourselves to the examination of the critical issues of mandatory vaccination to manage the pandemic; compulsory medical testing, including temperature screening of the population; the use of experimental drugs; making the wearing of face masks mandatory; and the individual responsibility of each of us for the prevention of the pandemic. Participation stresses the importance of education in bioethics. Accordingly, it supports the notion that, once we win the fight for life and health, constitutional lawyers ought to take the reins and determine that the character of restrictive measures and healthcare policies adopted in periods of crisis, when a prime opportunity for their formulation presented itself because of the pandemic, is one of extraordinariness.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Bioethical Quandaries during the Period of a Pandemic

Fereniki Panagopoulou-Koutnatzi
Fereniki Panagopoulou-Koutnatzi Panteion University

Research Journals