CEOas Commitment Bias and its Firm R&D Level Bayesian Network Method: Evidence Form Tunisia

CEOas Commitment Bias and its Firm R&D Level Bayesian Network Method: Evidence Form Tunisia

Azouzi Mohamed Ali

Contact

Hamza Fadhila

Contact

Jarboui Anis

Contact

α University of Sfax

CEOas Commitment Bias and its Firm R&D Level Bayesian Network Method: Evidence Form Tunisia

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

C: FINANCE91F17

CEOas Commitment Bias and its Firm R&D Level Bayesian Network Method: Evidence Form Tunisia Banner

AI TAKEAWAY

Connecting with the Eternal Ground

Abstract

In this paper we approach as to whether CEO’s incentives may lead to a positive manager’s innovation behavior. We search in this work to study this relationship conforming to the prediction of the theory of commitment. Accordingly, we hypothesize that CEO’s incentives can persuade a favorable attitude toward innovation but it can lead to an authentic behavior only with the presence of commitment bias. The proposed model of this paper uses Bayesian Network Method to examine this relationship. CEO’s attitude has been measured by means of a questionnaire comprising several items.

References

30 Cites in Article

Reference Format

F Abdullah,G Weiyu,M Vivek (2002). The relation of managerial holdings with Tobin's Q and R&D expenditures: Evidence from Japanese firms.
Anup Agrawal,Gershon Mandelker (1987). Managerial Incentives and Corporate Investment and Financing Decisions.
T Amabile (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity.
P Audia,E Locke,K Smith (2000). THE PARADOX OF SUCCESS: AN ARCHIVAL AND A LABORATORY STUDY OF STRATEGIC PERSISTENCE FOLLOWING RADICAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE..
Itzhak Ben-David,John Graham,Campbell Harvey (2007). Managerial Overconfidence and Corporate Policies.
J Bizjak,M Lemmon,L Naveen (2008). Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation?☆.
J Brusa,W Lee,C Shook (2007). Golden parachutes as managerial incentives.
J Chappé,J-F Verlhiac,T Meyer (2007). Optimisme et pessimisme comparatifs consécutifs à l'exposition à plusieurs messages menaçants.
G Charreaux (2008). À la recherche du lien perdu entre caractéristiques des dirigeants et performance de la firme : gouvernance et latitude managériale.
Chen Zheng,H Wu,S (2011). Senior manager overconfidence, managerial discretion and dividend policy: A study of Chinese listed companies.
Jianxin Chi,Shane Johnson (2008). The Value of Vesting Restrictions on Managerial Stock and Option Holdings.
Myeong-Hyeon Cho (1998). Ownership structure, investment, and the corporate value: An empirical analysis.
J Coles,N Daniel,L Naveen (2006). Managerial incentives and risk-taking.
John Core,Wayne Guay (2002). Estimating the Value of Employee Stock Option Portfolios and Their Sensitivities to Price and Volatility.
E Deci (1975). Intrinsic motivation.
Stacey Kole (1997). The complexity of compensation contracts.
Josh Lerner,Julie Wulf (2007). Innovation and Incentives: Evidence from Corporate R&D.
Jiatao Li,Yi Tang (2010). CEO Hubris and Firm Risk Taking in China: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion.
G Manso (2007). Motivating innovation.
J March (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.
J Mccullers (1978). Issues in learning and motivation.
K Mcgraw (1978). Issues in learning and motivation.
John Meyer,David Stanley,Lynne Herscovitch,Laryssa Topolnytsky (2002). Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: A Meta-analysis of Antecedents, Correlates, and Consequences.
J Meyer,N Allen (1991). A Treecomponent conceptualitazation of organizational commitment.
J Mitchell,Timothy Hart,Sorin Valcea,David Townsend (2009). Becoming the Boss: Discretion and Postsuccession Success in Family Firms.
Paul Oyer (2004). Why Do Firms Use Incentives That Have No Incentive Effects?.
Shivaram Rajgopal,Terry Shevlin (2002). Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking.
B Reed (2007). Stock-option packages spur risky CEO behavior; CEOs have less incentive to carefully analyze risk.
A Rothman,P Salovey (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing.
Kimberly Sawers,Arnold Wright,Valentina Zamora (2006). Loss Aversion, Instant Endowment and Risk-Bearing: The Relation between Stock-Based Compensation and Managerial Risk-Seeking Behavior.

Download References

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

How to Cite This Article

Azouzi Mohamed Ali. 2013. \u201cCEOas Commitment Bias and its Firm R&D Level Bayesian Network Method: Evidence Form Tunisia\u201d. Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance GJMBR-C Volume 13 (GJMBR Volume 13 Issue C11): .

More Citation Formats

Select Citation Style:

Download Citation

Download Article

GJMBR Volume 13 Issue C11
Pg. 31- 44

Explore Journals Explore Volume Read This Issue

Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJMBR

Print ISSN 0975-5853

e-ISSN 2249-4588

Keywords

bayesian net ceo’s incentives commitment bias executive power innovation loss aversion managerial discretion myopia optimism overconfidence

Submission ReceivedDecember 11, 2012
Peer Review Double Blind
Handling Editor
Accepted December 31, 2012
Published January 15, 2013

Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

December 19, 2013

Language

Experiance in AR

Explore published articles in an immersive Augmented Reality environment. Our platform converts research papers into interactive 3D books, allowing readers to view and interact with content using AR and VR compatible devices.

View in VR

Read in 3D

Your published article is automatically converted into a realistic 3D book. Flip through pages and read research papers in a more engaging and interactive format.

View in 3D

Article Matrices

Total Score: 103

Country: Tunisia

Subject: Global Journal of Management and Business Research - C: Finance

Authors: Hamza Fadhila, Azouzi Mohamed Ali, Jarboui Anis (PhD/Dr. count: 0)

View Count (all-time): 149

Total Views (Real + Logic): 4698

Total Downloads (simulated): 2344

Publish Date: 2013 12, Thu

Monthly Totals (Real + Logic):

Month 1: 66 views
Month 2: 18 views
Month 3: 36 views
Month 4: 58 views
Month 5: 50 views
Month 6: 37 views
Month 7: 40 views
Month 8: 28 views
Month 9: 38 views
Month 10: 30 views
Month 11: 45 views
Month 12: 32 views
Month 13: 39 views
Month 14: 40 views
Month 15: 39 views
Month 16: 10 views
Month 17: 27 views
Month 18: 43 views
Month 19: 16 views
Month 20: 47 views
Month 21: 27 views
Month 22: 39 views
Month 23: 24 views
Month 24: 43 views
Month 25: 25 views
Month 26: 18 views
Month 27: 30 views
Month 28: 32 views
Month 29: 28 views
Month 30: 46 views
Month 31: 25 views
Month 32: 31 views
Month 33: 27 views
Month 34: 39 views
Month 35: 35 views
Month 36: 22 views
Month 37: 20 views
Month 38: 30 views
Month 39: 21 views
Month 40: 27 views
Month 41: 36 views
Month 42: 44 views
Month 43: 23 views
Month 44: 18 views
Month 45: 31 views
Month 46: 33 views
Month 47: 40 views
Month 48: 27 views
Month 49: 41 views
Month 50: 16 views
Month 51: 21 views
Month 52: 27 views
Month 53: 29 views
Month 54: 29 views
Month 55: 44 views
Month 56: 44 views
Month 57: 23 views
Month 58: 29 views
Month 59: 29 views
Month 60: 25 views
Month 61: 21 views
Month 62: 37 views
Month 63: 14 views
Month 64: 43 views
Month 65: 18 views
Month 66: 15 views
Month 67: 30 views
Month 68: 23 views
Month 69: 19 views
Month 70: 30 views
Month 71: 27 views
Month 72: 24 views
Month 73: 28 views
Month 74: 27 views
Month 75: 40 views
Month 76: 25 views
Month 77: 39 views
Month 78: 15 views
Month 79: 42 views
Month 80: 20 views
Month 81: 41 views
Month 82: 36 views
Month 83: 32 views
Month 84: 17 views
Month 85: 30 views
Month 86: 29 views
Month 87: 37 views
Month 88: 33 views
Month 89: 42 views
Month 90: 19 views
Month 91: 19 views
Month 92: 43 views
Month 93: 36 views
Month 94: 34 views
Month 95: 30 views
Month 96: 26 views
Month 97: 35 views
Month 98: 42 views
Month 99: 42 views
Month 100: 23 views
Month 101: 27 views
Month 102: 18 views
Month 103: 31 views
Month 104: 31 views
Month 105: 30 views
Month 106: 36 views
Month 107: 37 views
Month 108: 16 views
Month 109: 27 views
Month 110: 33 views
Month 111: 40 views
Month 112: 43 views
Month 113: 22 views
Month 114: 28 views
Month 115: 40 views
Month 116: 44 views
Month 117: 43 views
Month 118: 21 views
Month 119: 18 views
Month 120: 29 views
Month 121: 17 views
Month 122: 33 views
Month 123: 39 views
Month 124: 23 views
Month 125: 38 views
Month 126: 29 views
Month 127: 19 views
Month 128: 28 views
Month 129: 23 views
Month 130: 14 views
Month 131: 31 views
Month 132: 34 views
Month 133: 30 views
Month 134: 30 views
Month 135: 17 views
Month 136: 35 views
Month 137: 25 views
Month 138: 38 views
Month 139: 23 views
Month 140: 26 views
Month 141: 15 views
Month 142: 28 views
Month 143: 26 views
Month 144: 30 views
Month 145: 40 views
Month 146: 26 views
Month 147: 53 views
Month 148: 56 views
Month 149: 42 views

Total Views: 4698

Total Downloads: 2344

2026 Trends

Published Article

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]