Changes in Carbon Stocks and Sequestration Potential under Native Forest and Adjacent Land use Systems at Gera, South-Western Ethiopia

1
Mohammed A
Mohammed A
2
Bekele L
Bekele L
1 Mizan-Tepi University

Send Message

To: Author

GJSFR Volume 14 Issue D10

Article Fingerprint

ReserarchID

036D5

Changes in Carbon Stocks and Sequestration Potential under Native Forest and Adjacent Land use Systems at Gera, South-Western Ethiopia Banner
  • English
  • Afrikaans
  • Albanian
  • Amharic
  • Arabic
  • Armenian
  • Azerbaijani
  • Basque
  • Belarusian
  • Bengali
  • Bosnian
  • Bulgarian
  • Catalan
  • Cebuano
  • Chichewa
  • Chinese (Simplified)
  • Chinese (Traditional)
  • Corsican
  • Croatian
  • Czech
  • Danish
  • Dutch
  • Esperanto
  • Estonian
  • Filipino
  • Finnish
  • French
  • Frisian
  • Galician
  • Georgian
  • German
  • Greek
  • Gujarati
  • Haitian Creole
  • Hausa
  • Hawaiian
  • Hebrew
  • Hindi
  • Hmong
  • Hungarian
  • Icelandic
  • Igbo
  • Indonesian
  • Irish
  • Italian
  • Japanese
  • Javanese
  • Kannada
  • Kazakh
  • Khmer
  • Korean
  • Kurdish (Kurmanji)
  • Kyrgyz
  • Lao
  • Latin
  • Latvian
  • Lithuanian
  • Luxembourgish
  • Macedonian
  • Malagasy
  • Malay
  • Malayalam
  • Maltese
  • Maori
  • Marathi
  • Mongolian
  • Myanmar (Burmese)
  • Nepali
  • Norwegian
  • Pashto
  • Persian
  • Polish
  • Portuguese
  • Punjabi
  • Romanian
  • Russian
  • Samoan
  • Scots Gaelic
  • Serbian
  • Sesotho
  • Shona
  • Sindhi
  • Sinhala
  • Slovak
  • Slovenian
  • Somali
  • Spanish
  • Sundanese
  • Swahili
  • Swedish
  • Tajik
  • Tamil
  • Telugu
  • Thai
  • Turkish
  • Ukrainian
  • Urdu
  • Uzbek
  • Vietnamese
  • Welsh
  • Xhosa
  • Yiddish
  • Yoruba
  • Zulu

The current study evaluated the differences in soil and biomass carbon (BC) stocks of native forest, annual crop field and coffee based agroforestry at Gera, South-west Ethiopia. A total of 24 sample plots were collected by Stratified random sampling method. After measuring the required parameters; BC (above and below ground), and SOC, texture, bulk density and pH were analyzed. The results showed that, BC significantly varied with land use types. On the other hand, the SOC under native forest and coffee based agroforestry has no significant difference, while it shows significant difference under the annual crop field. The present study indicated that, the total carbon stock in the native forest is greater than coffee based agroforestry which shows much greater difference than annual crop field. This may indicate that, conversion of annual crop field to coffee based agroforestry can increases carbon stock and sequestration potential in the study area.

54 Cites in Articles

References

  1. Rien Aerts (1997). Climate, Leaf Litter Chemistry and Leaf Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Triangular Relationship.
  2. Diógenes Alves,João Soares,Silvana Amaral,Eliana Mello,Sérgio Almeida,Osman Da Silva,Andrea Silveira (1997). Biomass of primary and secondary vegetation in Rondônia, Western Brazilian Amazon.
  3. J Balesdent,M Balbane (1996). Major contribution of roots to soil carbon storage inferred from maize cultivated soils.
  4. J Balesdent,A Mariotti,D Biosgontier (1990). Effect of tillage on soil organic carbon mineralization estimated from 13C abundance in maize fields.
  5. S Bangroo,N Kirmani,A Tahir,A Mushtaq,M Bhat,M Bhat (2011). Adapting Agriculture for Enhancing Eco-efficiency through Soil Carbon.
  6. N Batjes,W Sombroek (1997). Possibilities for carbon sequestration in tropical and subtropical soils.
  7. L Bekele (2006). Impact of exotic tree plantations on carbon and nutrient dynamics in abandoned farmland soils of southwestern Ethiopia.
  8. B Berg,Mc Claugherty,C (2003). Plant litter: decomposition, humus formation, carbon sequestration.
  9. G Blomme,G Sebuwufu,T Addis,L Turyagyenda (2008). Relative performance of root and shoot development in Enset and east African highland Banana.
  10. Marieke Sandker,Till Neeff (1997). Advances in monitoring and reporting forest emissions and removals in the context of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC).
  11. S Brown,A Gillespie,A Lugo (1989). Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data.
  12. S Brown,J Sathaye,M Cannell,P Kauppi (1995). R.T. Watson, M.C. Zinyowera, R.H. Moss, D.J. Dokken, editors. Climate change 1995. <i>Impacts, adaptations and mitigation of climate change: scientific-technical analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</i>. x, 879p. Cambridge University Press, 1996. Price £65.00, (£24-95 Paperback)..
  13. M Cairns,S Brown,E Helme,G Baumgardner (1997). Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests.
  14. M Cannell,R Milne (1995). Carbon pools and sequestration in forest ecosystems in Britain.
  15. Clark Db,Clark Da (2000). Variation in forest structure across a tropical rain forest landscape and its relation to edaphic factors.
  16. A Davis,M Stolt,J Compton (2004). Spatial distribution of soil Carbon in Southern New England hardwood forest landscapes.
  17. M Delaney,M Powell (1998). Noel Kempff Mercado Climate Action Project: Project Case Carbon Inventory and Offset Benefits.
  18. Morrilton Dr,A Morrilton (1981). Health hazard evaluation report: HHE-79-158-819, Morrilton Plastics Corporation, Morrilton, Arkansas..
  19. C Dominy,R Haynes,R Van Antwerpen (2002). Loss of soil organic matter and related soil properties under long-term sugarcane production on two contrasting soils.
  20. E Dossa,E Fernandes,W Reid,K Ezui (2008). Above- and belowground biomass, nutrient and carbon stocks contrasting an open-grown and a shaded coffee plantation.
  21. P Fahnestock,R Lal,G Hall (1996). Land Use and Erosional Effects on Two Ohio Alfisols:.
  22. Y Fantaw,Stig Abdu,A (2008). Concentrations of exchangeable bases and cation exchange capacity in soils of cropland, grazing and forest in the Bale Mountains, Ethiopia.
  23. R Fisher,D Binkley (2000). Ecology and management of forest soils, 3rd ed.
  24. M Fröberg (2004). Processes controlling production and transport of dissolved organic carbon in forest soils.
  25. H Tata,A Muchugi,R Kariba,M Van Noordwijk (2001). Genetic diversity of Dyera polyphylla (Miq.) Steenis populations used in tropical peatland restoration in Indonesia.
  26. P Högberg,A Nordgren,G Ågren (2002). Carbon allocation between tree root growth and root respiration in boreal pine forest.
  27. (1920). Intergovernmental Panel in Climate Change (IPCC).
  28. Michael Keller,Michael Palace,George Hurtt (2000). Biomass estimation in the Tapajos National Forest, Brazil.
  29. R Lal (1999). Soil management and restoration for C sequestration to mitigate the accelerated greenhouse effect.
  30. R Lal (2005). Forest soils and carbon sequestration.
  31. R Lasco1,Mac Dicken,K Pulhin,F Guillermo,I Sales,R Cruz,R (2006). Carbon Stocks Assessment of a selectively logged dipterocarp forest and Wood Processing Mill in the Philippines.
  32. P Lefebvre,R Houghton,J Unruh (1993). Current land covers in the Tropics and its potential for sequestering carbon.
  33. A Lehtonen,R Mäkipää,J Heikkinen,R Sievänen,J Liski (2004). Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests.
  34. Mulugeta Lemenih,Erik Karltun,Mats Olsson (2005). Soil organic matter dynamics after deforestation along a farm field chronosequence in southern highlands of Ethiopia.
  35. Jari Liski,Daniel Perruchoud,Timo Karjalainen (2002). Increasing carbon stocks in the forest soils of western Europe.
  36. J Mc Donagh,T Thomsen,J Magid (2001). Soil organic matter decline and compositional change associated with cereal cropping in southern Tanzania.
  37. Jerry Melillo,A Mcguire,David Kicklighter,Berrien Moore,Charles Vorosmarty,Annette Schloss (1993). Global climate change and terrestrial net primary production.
  38. R Milne,T Brown (1997). Carbon in the Vegetation and Soils of Great Britain.
  39. G Nabuurs,R Paivinen,R Sikkema,G Mohren (1997). The role of European forests in the global carbon cycle -a review.
  40. C Palm,P Woomer,J Alegre,L Arevalo,C Castilla,D Cordeiro,B Feig,K Hairiah,J Kotto-Same,A Mendes,A Moukam,D Murdiyarso,R Njomgang,W Parton,A Ricse,V Rodrigues,S Sitompul,M Van Noordwijk (2000). Carbon Sequestration and trace gas emissions in slash-and-burn and alternative land-uses in the humid tropics. ASB climate change working group final report.
  41. K Patrick,G Mutuo (2005). Potentials of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics.
  42. I Prentice,Jon Lloyd (1998). C-quest in the Amazon Basin.
  43. C Price,R Willis (1993). Commonwealth Forestry Review.
  44. James Roshetko,Rodel Lasco,Marian Angeles (2008). Smallholder Agroforestry Systems For Carbon Storage.
  45. J Roshetko,M Delaney,K Hairiah,P Purnomosidhi (2002). Carbon stocks in Indonesian homegarden systems: can smallholder systems be targeted for increased carbon storage.
  46. R Sampson,R Scholes,B Watson,I Noble (2000). Additional human-induced activities.
  47. M Sugara,M Kanninen,D Suarez (2006). Allometric models for estimating aboveground biomass of shade trees and coffee bushes grown together.
  48. (2004). SAS/STAT, User's Guide, Version 9.
  49. M Takahashi,S Ishizuka,S Ugawa,Y Sakai,H Sakai,K Ono,S Hashimoto,Y Matsuura,K Morisada (2010). Carbon stock in litter, deadwood and soil in Japan's forest sector and its comparison with carbon stock in agricultural soils.
  50. Hanqin Tian,Jerry Melillo,David Kicklighter,A Mcguire,John Helfrich,Berrien Moore,Charles Vörösmarty (1998). Effect of interannual climate variability on carbon storage in Amazonian ecosystems.
  51. Meine Van Noordwijk,Rachmat Mulia (2002). Functional branch analysis as tool for fractal scaling above- and belowground trees for their additive and non-additive properties.
  52. Peter Vitousek,Julie Denslow (1986). Nitrogen and Phosphorus Availability in Treefall Gaps of a Lowland Tropical Rainforest.
  53. A Walkley,I Black (1934). An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chronic acid titration method.
  54. L Wilding,L Drees,L Nordt (2001). Spatial Variability Enhancing the Mean Estimate of Organic and Inorganic Carbon in a Sampling Unit.

Funding

No external funding was declared for this work.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

No ethics committee approval was required for this article type.

Data Availability

Not applicable for this article.

Mohammed A. 2015. \u201cChanges in Carbon Stocks and Sequestration Potential under Native Forest and Adjacent Land use Systems at Gera, South-Western Ethiopia\u201d. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research - D: Agriculture & Veterinary GJSFR-D Volume 14 (GJSFR Volume 14 Issue D10): .

Download Citation

Issue Cover
GJSFR Volume 14 Issue D10
Pg. 11- 19
Journal Specifications

Crossref Journal DOI 10.17406/GJSFR

Print ISSN 0975-5896

e-ISSN 2249-4626

Classification
Not Found
Version of record

v1.2

Issue date

January 14, 2015

Language

English

Experiance in AR

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Read in 3D

The methods for personal identification and authentication are no exception.

Article Matrices
Total Views: 4130
Total Downloads: 2215
2026 Trends
Research Identity (RIN)
Related Research

Published Article

The current study evaluated the differences in soil and biomass carbon (BC) stocks of native forest, annual crop field and coffee based agroforestry at Gera, South-west Ethiopia. A total of 24 sample plots were collected by Stratified random sampling method. After measuring the required parameters; BC (above and below ground), and SOC, texture, bulk density and pH were analyzed. The results showed that, BC significantly varied with land use types. On the other hand, the SOC under native forest and coffee based agroforestry has no significant difference, while it shows significant difference under the annual crop field. The present study indicated that, the total carbon stock in the native forest is greater than coffee based agroforestry which shows much greater difference than annual crop field. This may indicate that, conversion of annual crop field to coffee based agroforestry can increases carbon stock and sequestration potential in the study area.

Our website is actively being updated, and changes may occur frequently. Please clear your browser cache if needed. For feedback or error reporting, please email [email protected]
×

This Page is Under Development

We are currently updating this article page for a better experience.

Request Access

Please fill out the form below to request access to this research paper. Your request will be reviewed by the editorial or author team.
X

Quote and Order Details

Contact Person

Invoice Address

Notes or Comments

This is the heading

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

High-quality academic research articles on global topics and journals.

Changes in Carbon Stocks and Sequestration Potential under Native Forest and Adjacent Land use Systems at Gera, South-Western Ethiopia

Mohammed A
Mohammed A Mizan-Tepi University
Bekele L
Bekele L

Research Journals